Paper
Green Chemistry
cation of microwave irradiation showed a positive effect on 1 : 1) from 90 : 5 to 60 : 40. Elution of the products was moni-
yields, reaction time and byproduct formation without de- tored by UV detection and by TLC. Fractions corresponding
naturing the enzyme when pNP pyranoside was used as a sub- to individual products were collected, evaporated and
strate. Interestingly our methodology enabled the enzymatic lyophilized.
transglycosylation reaction of a glucosyl unit onto a range of
alkyl furanoside acceptors to selectively obtain alkyl α-Glcp-
(
1,3)-Araf or Galf. Such scaffolds need yet to be evaluated for
Acknowledgements
potential surfactant properties or as bacteriostatics.
We are grateful to Novozymes A/S (Bagvaerd, Denmark) for the
gift or Toruzyme® 3.0 L, to Rennes Metropole for a mobility
fellowship to A. P. and to “Région Bretagne” and CNRS for
financial support.
Experimental section
Materials
All reagents were purchased from commercial sources and
were used without further purification unless noted. Thermo-
anaerobacter sp. CGTase (Toruzyme® 3.0 L) was a gift from
Novozymes A/S (Bagvaerd, Denmark).
References
1
A. Ranoux, L. Lemiegre, M. Benoit, J.-P. Guegan and
T. Benvegnu, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2010, 1314–1323.
Kinetics of the enzymatic reaction with pNP glycosides
The synthesis ability of the CGTases from Thermoanaerobacter
sp. was previously investigated and the reaction with the
enzyme was optimized to efficiently produce the primary coup-
ling product. Typically, CGTase (10 µL, 2.34 mg mL− ) was
added into 1.5 mL microtubes containing β-cyclodextrin
2
I. Chlubnova, D. Filipp, V. Spiwok, H. Dvorakova,
R. Daniellou, C. Nugier-Chauvin, B. Kralova and
V. Ferrieres, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2010, 8, 2092–2102.
L. Legentil, J.-L. Audic, R. Daniellou, C. Nugier-Chauvin
and V. Ferrières, Carbohydr. Res., 2011, 346, 1541–1545.
B. K. Singh, A. K. Yadav, B. Kumar, A. Gaikwad, S. K. Sinha,
V. Chaturvedi and R. P. Tripathi, Carbohydr. Res., 2008, 343,
1
3
4
(
5
100 mg, 0.1 mM) and various carbohydrates (0.2 mM) in
0 mM phosphate buffer, pH 6.0 (1 mL) at 50 °C. The reaction
mixtures were incubated in a thermomixer (Eppendorf) for
2 h. 50 µL samples were withdrawn at different intervals and
1153–1162.
7
5
6
B. L. Wilkinson, H. Long, E. Sim and A. J. Fairbanks,
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2008, 18, 6265–6267.
M. Suleman, J.-P. Gangneux, L. Legentil, S. Belaz,
Y. Cabezas, C. Manuel, R. Dureau, O. Sergent, A. Burel,
F. Daligault, V. Ferrières and F. Robert-Gangneux, Antimi-
crob. Agents Chemother., 2014, 58, 2156–2166.
diluted with 950 µL of acetonitrile–water (50 : 50) followed by a
filtration before chromatographic analysis.
HPLC analysis
Chromatographic analysis was carried out on an Agilent 1200
HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Mexico), equipped with
the ChemStation software, a micro-vacuum degasser G1322A, a
quaternary pump G1311A, an autosampler G1329A, a thermo-
static column compartment G1316A, and a diode array detec-
tor G1315B. An analytical Alltech® Prevail™ carbohydrate ES
column (Analytical, 4.6 × 250 mm, 5 µm, Grace) was used for
chromatographic separation at 35 °C. Using acetonitrile
7 R. Daniellou, C. Nugier-Chauvin, V. Ferrieres, A. Pennec
and I. Chlubnova, PCT Int. Appl Pat., WO2013160205A1,
2013.
8 T. Lipiński, C. Jones, X. Lemercinier, A. Korzeniowska-
Kowal, M. Strus, J. Rybka, A. Gamian and P. B. Heczko, Car-
bohydr. Res., 2003, 338, 605–609.
9 V. M. Marshall, H. Dunn, M. Elvin, N. McLay, Y. Gu and
A. P. Laws, Carbohydr. Res., 2001, 331, 413–422.
(
mobile phase A) and purified and distilled water (mobile
−
1
phase B) at a flow rate of 1 mL min , HPLC analysis started 10 M. Olszewska and M. Wolbis, Pol. J. Chem., 2002, 76, 967–
with 20% B followed by a gradient to 50% B over 40 min, then
974.
by a gradient step for 1 min back to 20% B, before isocratic 11 B. Henrissat and G. Davies, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 1997,
elution with starting conditions within 30 min. The injection
7, 637–644.
volume of each sample was 10 μL. Simultaneous monitoring 12 Q. Qi and W. Zimmermann, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.,
was performed at 300, 368 and 400 nm.
2005, 66, 475–485.
1
3 S. Kitahata, in Enzyme chemistry and molecular biology of
amylases and related enzymes, The Amylase Res. Soc., Japan,
Transglycosylation reactions with a glycosidic acceptor on a
preparative scale
1995, pp. 6–17.
Reaction conditions were implemented as previously described 14 W. Wongsangwattana, J. Kaulpiboon, K. Ito and
in a 1 mL final volume using a molar ratio glycoside/β-cyclo- P. Pongsawasdi, Process Biochem., 2010, 45, 947–953.
dextrin 3/1 and CGTase (10 µL, 2.34 mg mL ). The resulting 15 A. Nakamura, K. Haga and K. Yamane, FEBS Lett., 1994,
mixture was incubated at 50 °C for 72 h. The reaction mixture 337, 66–70.
was lyophilized and the residue was purified by silica gel flash 16 D. Svensson, S. Ulvenlund and P. Adlercreutz, Green Chem.,
chromatography using an eluent gradient AcOEt–(AcOH–H O, 2009, 11, 1222–1226.
−
1
2
3808 | Green Chem., 2014, 16, 3803–3809
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014