P. Dhanamjayulu, et al.
Toxicon 170 (2019) 60–67
these compounds can be added prior to processing or during storage as
antifungal or anti-aflatoxigenic agents.
Many fermentation processes are carried out by species of Aspergillus
and Penicillium having the potential to synthesize mycotoxins. Not only
the organisms involved but contamination carried with raw material
also has the chance to grow due to suitable physiological and nutri-
tional conditions and produce mycotoxins including aflatoxins during
the fermentation process. Aspergillus oryzae, the main organism for koji
fermentation is an atoxigenic strain of A. flavus developed by domes-
tication having 99.5% genomic similarity including the genes involved
biosynthesis (Gibbons et al., 2012; Yin et al., 2018). Though
, longer incubation may result in
mycotoxin synthesis (Ciegler and Vesonder, 1987). Long ago, Kinosita
et al. (1968) reported the toxigenic strains of A. flavus and other As-
pergillus genus from koji.
Table 4
Effect of test compounds on HeLa cells after 48 h of culture in DMEM medium
and 10% FBS.
Compound
μg/well
% Cytotoxicity
Control
–
0.8
1
0
b
94.24 ± 1.00a
−8.17 ± 0.78
−4.29 ± 0.80
AFB
1
6-NFBD
6-CAFBD
6-AFBD
10
1
10
1
10
1
10
a
1.83 ± 0.58
3.28 ± 0.34
7.46 ± 0.46
9.38 ± 0.72
a
a
in AFB
1
a
this strain does not produce AFB
1
FBD
−32.61 ± 1.07
0.57 ± 0.63a
Values are mean (n = 3) ± SD.
SD, standard deviation.
Cheese is another common fermented product, which has the risk of
mycotoxin contamination. Hymery et al. (2014) in their comprehensive
a
Means with the same superscript in the same column for each variable
showing no significant difference at (P ≤ 0.05).
review on mycotoxins in cheese stated that even though the risk of AFB
contamination is low in cheese, it should be controlled. Cheese is
contaminated with various toxigenic fungi including AFB -producing
strains of Aspergillus but it is a poor substrate for AFB production.
Apart from AFM , other aflatoxins had not been reported from cheese,
but there were other reports of sterigmatocystin contamination (Scott,
989; Nasser, 2001), which is a precursor and structurally similar to
1
b
1
Standard AFB Used as a positive control.
1
fungicidal effect and more commonly studied against pathogenic strains
like Candida albicans, and Aspergillus fumigatus (Del Poeta et al., 1998).
Generally antifungal agents work by impairing or disrupting the er-
gosterol, chitin synthesis, targeting nucleic acids, protein synthesis and
microtubule synthesis (Kathiravan et al., 2012), and however the me-
chanism of fungicidal activity of benzimidazoles is not yet clear (Can
et al., 2017; Thamban Chandrika et al., 2018). Apart from pathogenic
fungi, these compounds are also found to be effective against sapro-
phytic strains like Aspergillus flavus (Chandrika et al., 2016). Moon et al.
1
1
1
aflatoxins. However, it is less toxic than aflatoxins (Sweeney and
Dobson, 1998).
The mycotoxin risks in the fermented food can be prevented with
the use of benzimidazole derivatives 6-NFBD, 6-AFBD and 6-CAFBD as
established through this study. These compounds impaired the AFB
1
(
2016) have reported that 1,3-benzodioxole and compounds containing
synthesis without affecting the mold growth. Since mold growth is
necessary for the fermentation process, these compounds may be better
candidates as AFB inhibitors when compared to other known fungi-
1
cides. Safety is an important aspect for the compounds to be used in
food processing. Many benzimidazole derivatives are already in use as
therapeutics, and our preliminary assay with animal cell line also
showed of their non-toxic nature, at the concentrations used, making
1
them promising candidates to be used for the control of AFB during
food processing. However, more animal experiments are necessary to
confirm the safety of these compounds.
methylenedioxy are fungicidal at 1000 μg/mL concentration. However,
the activity decreased drastically at lower concentrations. In the present
study, we found complete inhibition of fungal growth by FBD at 50 μg/
mL and at 9 μg/mL 50% inhibition was noted. More polar derivatives of
FBD (6-NFBD, 6-AFBD, 6-CAFBD, and 6-CFBD) did not impair the
fungal growth but effectively inhibited the AFB biosynthesis.
1
While studying the gene expression of A. flavus in control and in the
presence of 6-NFBD, a significant down-regulation of regulatory aflR
1
and structural aflB gene was observed. 6-NFBD, a strong AFB inhibitor
did not show any effect on the expression of the housekeeping gene
gpdA. The same level of gpdA expression was noted in the presence or
absence of 6-NFBD. This shows that 6-NFBD does not alter the primary
metabolism of A. flavus. aflR gene is a positive regulator for many genes
involved in the secondary metabolism, especially genes coding for the
In conclusion, present study reports that test compounds; 6-NFBD,
6
-AFBD and 6-CAFBD derivatives of a known fungicide, FBD, do not
impair the growth of A. flavus, but specifically inhibit the biosynthesis
of AFB . Test compounds are active even after autoclaving with YES
medium or rice showing their thermal stability. In-vitro testing on HeLa
cell line showed no toxic effect of the compounds at the concentrations
1
1
enzymes involved in AFB synthesis cascade. Absence of aflR gene
product resulted in the inhibition of aflatoxins (Al-Saad et al., 2016; Liu
and Chu, 1998; Yu et al., 2004), and we observed the down-regulation
of aflR in presence of 6-NFBD that can be correlated with the down-
regulation of aflB. The structural gene for the beta subunit of fatty acid
synthase enzyme part of the gene cluster that mediates AFB
synthesis. These observations can explain the inhibition of AFB
1
0 times higher than used in present study. Due to their non-toxic
nature, thermal stability and specific inhibition of AFB synthesis, these
1
compounds can be added during fermentation, food processing or sto-
rage as anti-aflatoxigenic agents.
1
bio-
in
1
presence of 6-NFBD without having any adverse effect on the fungal
growth.
Conflicts of interest
It was reported that the membrane permeability pattern of a dif-
ferent set of benzimidazoles correlates with the polarity and hydro-
philicity factors (Alvarez-Figueroa et al., 2011). Therefore, our results
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in the
publication.
predict that such polar derivatives of FBD are controlling the AFB
synthesis.
1
Acknowledgments
It is noted from many studies that compounds found to be effective
in laboratory conditions, like culture medium, have failed in the field
when tested with food grains. However, these benzimidazole deriva-
tives used in the study have also shown good anti-aflatoxigenic activity
in rice. Though the IC50 concentrations were comparatively higher than
that in YES medium (Fig. 5). The test compounds utilized in this study
were found to be quite stable in nature even during autoclaving along
with culture medium (YES) or rice that is done to ensure sterility. Hence
The authors wish to thank the management of the VIT University for
providing the VIT SEED GRANT and facilities for carrying out the work.
The financial support to one of the authors (Dhanamjayulu P) from the
VIT is also gratefully acknowledged. The thanks are due to Dr
Vijayalakshmi S, Associate professor and Dr Ajanta Sircar, Professor,
School of Social Science and Languages, VIT, Vellore, India, for their
help in the editing of the manuscript.
66