t-BuCl has acted as a “perfect” additional source for HCl.
It led to nearly thrice as much PCDD/ F compared with
PhCl per se under like conditions, notwithstanding a ∼25%
lower PhCl input level. Apparently, the population on the
catalyst surface alters in a way that there is more Cl (lowering
the overall rate of conversion of PhCl) that accelerates
chlorination but also leads to more PCDD/ F (see below).
Micropollutant Mixture. Refraining from a discussion of
the fate of individual constituents, we may note that the
cocktail contained little aliphatics which could have “helped”
in keeping the catalyst clean and highly active. Given that,
let us focus at the PCDD/ Fs observed. With an input level
of the major constituent benzene ∼5 times lower than that
of PhCl, the dioxin output nevertheless increased ∼25-fold.
This is notwithstanding the much lower chlorine level: in a
standard PhCl experiment the total input in a 18 h run was
TABLE 3. Toxicity Levels
TEQ [ng Nm-3
]
PhCl
PhCl + t-BuCl
PIC m ixture
93a
31
571
a
For PhCl, the m ain com ponents that contribute to the total TEQ are
CDD (1)*71.5 ) 71.5 ng
(
with I-TEF factors in parentheses): 2,3,7,8-T
Nm ; 1,2,3,7,8-P
0.1)*52 ) 5.2 ng Nm ; other com ponents give a neglible contribution.
4
-
3
-3
5
CDD (0.5)*31.6 ) 15.8 ng Nm ; 1,2,3,4,7,8-H CDF
6
-3
(
meant for levels in food, etc., it is worthwhile to express the
outputs of PCDD/ Fsat the conditions mentioned in Table
3
1
sas ng I-TEQ/ Nm (Table 3). These can be compared with
values, common for “raw” MSW incinerator combustion off-
-
3
gases, viz., ∼0.1-0.75 µg m (36), for “full” toxic 17 PCDD/
∼
4.5 mequiv of Cl and in the runs with the cocktail only
Fs; when expressed in TEQ, these numbers will be about a
about 0.24 mequiv. Not surprising, the chlorination pattern
is somewhat biased to the lower chlorinated congeners, but
the average degree of chlorination of the PCDFs is still close
to 5.0.
-
3
factor 50 less or 2-15 ng Nm , which is still much higher
than an aimed or regulated emission level of <0.1 ng TEQ
-
3
Nm . Our result with the PIC mixturesalbeit, fed at much
higher concentrations than present in real combustion off-
gasessalso shows that a malfunctioning catalytic bed may
lead to much higher levels of dioxins than originally present.
Next to the option of co-feeding “soft” hydrocarbons (could
for example be naphtha), proper process control is required
to guarantee operation according to specification.
Pathways to PCDD/F. Without neglecting some sub-
stantial differences in the congener/ isomer compositions,
the outputs from PhCl and the PIC cocktail are quite
comparable, also with the PCDD/ F profiles common for MSW
facilities, where catalysis by fly ash is important. In the latter
case, catalysis cannot be due to Ptsor any other noble metals
but is based on copper (and maybe iron also) (29). Never-
theless, the similarities suggest common underlying mech-
anisms. In contrast with fly ash, our catalyst does not contain
nor forms any carbon, not so strange under the very “lean”
conditions employed. Therefore, de novo formation (30)s
common term for making dioxins from macromolecular
structures such as carbon and sootsdoes not have to be
taken into account. Instead, “precursor” pathways must be
involved. Consider the result with the PIC cocktail (Table 1,
entry 4). The output of 3.5 nmol means nearly 0.02 mol %
based on the total input of dibenzofuran, of ∼20 µmol in 18
h. Repeated chlorination of dibenzofuran may have con-
tributed to at least the PCDF production. More likely
candidates are the “trace” amounts of phenols in the cocktail
Acknowledgments
Financial support from the European Union within the
framework of the ‘MINIDIP’ project (Contract ENV4-CT97-
0
587). Our thanks are due to Dr. Kees Olie of the University
of Amsterdam as well as to Dr. Per Liljelind and Dr. Stellan
Marklund, Chemistry Department, Environmental Chem-
istry, Umeå University for performing the dioxin analyses.
Literature Cited
(
(
(
1) Van den Brink, R. W.; Mulder, P.; Louw, R. Catal. Today 1999,
4, 101-106.
2) Burch, R.; Crittle, D. J.; Hayes, M. J. Catal. Today 1999, 47, 229-
34.
5
2
3) Au-Yeung, J.; Chen, K.; Bell, A. T.; Iglesia, I. J. Catal. 1999, 188,
(
31-33) expressed on the intake of phenol itself the PCDD/ F
132-139.
outputsunder the used conditionssis 0.07%. In the reactions
with PhCl per se, chlorinated phenoxy entitiessnot neces-
sarily free chlorinated phenolssare likely intermediates. That
PCDD/ F patterns (from precursors) are a function of catalyst
and conditions, and pertinent mechanistic aspects will be
discussed separately (34). Which compounds in a realistic
cocktail are really involved in dioxin formation is worth further
study (35)snot only for oxidation on well-defined catalysts
but also in fly ash mediated processes in combustors.
Noteworthy is that the PIC cocktail, in reaction over MSW
incinerator fly ash, also leads to a “common” PCDD/ F product
with a DF:DD ratio of ∼4 (33, 35, 36).
(4) Burch, R.; Loader, P. K. Appl. Catal. B 1994, 5, 149-164.
(
(
5) Spivey, J. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1987, 26, 2165-2180.
6) Lago, R. M.; Green, M. L. H.; Tsang, S. C.; Odlyha, M. Appl.
Catal. B 1996, 8, 107-121.
(
(
7) Imamura, S. Catal. Today 1992, 11, 547-567.
8) Stenger, H. G.; Buzan, G. E.; Berty, J. M. Appl. Catal. B 1993, 2,
117-130.
(9) Krishnamoorthy, S.; Baker, J. P.; Amiridis, M. D. Catal. Today
998, 40, 39-46.
1
(
(
10) Van den Brink, R. W.; Mulder, P.; Louw, R.; Sinquin, G.; Petit,
C.; Hindermann, J.-P. J. Catal. 1998, 180, 153-160.
11) Jang, B. H.; Lee, S. S.; Yeon, T. H.; Yie, J. E. Kor. J. Chem. Eng.
1998, 15, 516-526.
(12) NIST Standard Thermodynamic Database; available at http:/ /
webbook.NIST.gov.
Perform ance and Safety. As mentioned in the Introduc-
tion, in practice, a successful catalytic combustion should
be complete and durable, the more so if chlorine is involved.
When processing “recalcitrant” chlorinated aromatics, co-
feeding of a proper alkane (such as heptane with PhCl) is
highly beneficial, as it increases rates for chlorobenzene(s)
and suppresses (oxy)chlorinationsand almost certainly also
dioxin formationsas side reactions. A safe margin in working
temperature is of course also advisable. For a safe application
of (in this case, supported Pt) in the destruction ofseven,
dioxin-containingswaste gases, this approach should be
further tested, also including the effect of increased HCl levels,
and checked for compliance with regulation.
(
(
13) Agarwal, S. K.; Spivey, J. J.; Butt, J. B. Appl. Catal. A 1992, 82,
59-275.
14) Padilla, A. M.; Corella, J.; Toledo, J. M. Appl. Catal. B 1999, 22,
2
1
07-121.
(15) Corella, J.; Toledo, J. M. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41, 1171-
1181.
(
(
16) Van den Brink, R. W.; Louw, R.; Mulder, P. Appl. Catal. B 1998,
6, 219-226.
1
17) Van den Brink, R. W. Ph.D. Thesis, Leiden University, Leiden,
The Netherlands, 1999 (in English).
(18) Green, M. L. H.; Lago, R. M.; Tsang, S. C. J. Chem. Soc. Chem.
Commun. 1995, 365-366.
(
19) Schneider, R.; Kiessling, D.; Herzschuh, R.; Wendt, G. React.
Kinet. Catal. Lett. 1997, 61, 245-251.
20) De Jong, V.; Cieplik, M. K.; Reints, W. A.; Fernandez-Reino, F.;
Louw, R. J. Catal. 2002, 211, 355-365.
(
Reactions conducted at incomplete conversion also serve
as a model for malfunctioning by deactivation of the catalyst
or by temperatures lower than required. Although primarily
(21) Van den Brink, R. W.; Krzan, M.; Feijen-Jeurissen, M. M. R.;
Louw, R.; Mulder, P. Appl. Catal. B 1999, 24, 255-264.
5
2 2 2
9
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY / VOL. 38, NO. 19, 2004