M.C. Bourkaib et al.
Process Biochemistry 99 (2020) 307–315
2.4. Purification of the final product
intial rates of the reaction by using a third order polynomial model
applied to the derivate of the first experimental data points exhibited in
the figures. The maximum velocity (Vmax) and the Michaelis-Menten
constant (Km) for each substrate were determined using a standard
In order to get, for the first time, a pure enzymatically produced N-
10-undecenoyl-pheylalanine, a purification process was developed. The
300 mL final reaction medium containing 1.53 g of the produced C11’F,
residual 10-undecenoic acid (4.64 g) and L-phenylalanine (4.16 g) and
the enzymes was used for the development of the purification protocol.
The first stage was an ultrafiltration with a 10 kDa membrane (Amicon
ultra-15; Merck) made of regenerated cellulose in order to eliminate
small molecules coming from the aminoacylases crude extract. Two
diafiltration steps and a 10-fold concentration step of the initial mixture
were performed by centrifugation during 30 min and 5000 rpm, using a
fixed angle rotor (Centrifuge 5804 R, Eppendorf). The second stage of
the protocol consisted in removing the proteins by precipitation with
methanol. To do this the 30 mL concentrated solution was diluted 10
times with a 80%/20% methanol/water solution. After 3 hours magnetic
agitation the precipitated proteins were removed by centrifugation
(20 min at 8400 rpm and 15 ◦C). The methanol present in the superna-
tant part was evaporated using a rotating evaporator (Laborota 4002
control, Heidolph, Germany). The third stage consisted in removing
residual impurities and salts by size exclusion chromatography (Bio-
Michaelis-Menten model based on the equation of the graphic repre-
( )
1
1
1
Km
1
senting
= f
=
∗
+
Vmax where V is the initial rate and S is
V
S
S
Vmax
the substrate concentration.
2.5.2. Mass spectrometry analysis
We performed the qualitative and semi-quantitative analysis of N-10-
undecenoyl-phenylalanine by using an HPLC-MS-MS system (Thermo-
Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) consisting in a binary pump con-
nected to a photodiode array detector (PDA) and a Linear Trap
Quadrupole mass spectrometer (LTQ). An atmospheric pressure ioniza-
tion interface operating in positive electrospray mode (ESI+) was used.
The chromatographic separation and mass spectrometric conditions that
were used as described in details in [23]. Raw data were processed using
SepTM SEC-S2000 300 × 21.2 mm, 5
μm particle diameter, Phenomesex,
2.6. Biological activity evaluation
USA). The elution of the 5 mL injected volume was performed using an
isocratic system (45% acetonitrile) with a 5 mL/min flow rate, during
37 min. The mixture C11’/C11’F was collected after a 23 min elution
time. The recovered mixture was then concentrated by evaporation for
the next stage of purification by liquid chromatographic method.
Different high pressure reverse phase liquid chromatography methods
were tested using a “classical” C18 column (Grace/Alltech, Darmstadt,
The evaluation of the melanin production by melanocytes was per-
formed using B16 murine melanoma cells (B16F1 cells) following the
method described by Chung et al., 2019 with some adaptations [24].
B16F1 cells were maintained in a CO2 incubator in Dulbecco’s modified
Eagle medium (DMEM), without phenol red, supplemented with 10%
fetal bovine serum, penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 μg/ml).
Germany, 150 mm × 2.1 mm, 5
μ
m particle size) or less classical C30
m particle size,
Cells were incubated in CO2 for 24 h after being seeded in 96-well plate
(6000 cells/well). Then cells were treated with SepiwhiteTM MSH
(SEPPIC) or enzymatic N-10-undecylenoyl-phenylalanine initially dis-
solved in ethanol or the culture medium. Two different concentrations of
phases (LC Acclaim™ C30, 250 mm × 2.1 mm, 5
μ
ThermoFisher scientific, USA) and also a more specific phase containing
phenyl functional groups on its surface (Force Biphenyl
5
5
μ
m,
m,
150 × 2.1 mm for analytic column and Ultra Biphenyl
μ
each was tested (10 and 50
μ
g/mL) and kojic acid at 50
μ
g/mL in the
250 × 21.2 mm for preparative column, Restek, USA). However, the
very close physicochemical properties of the product and the residual
fatty acid, like hydrophobicity (logP C11’ = 3.99, logP C11’F = 5.05),
did not allow their proper separation. Also, although the biphenyl
analytical scale column showed its capability to separate the two mol-
ecules with about 2 min difference in retention times, the same phase
used in a preparative scale column did not allow any separation
anymore even after several different trials. Actually, normal phase
chromatography using Kieselgel G 60 powder under atmospheric pres-
sure appeared to be the most suitable method leading to the pure
product. The mixture 50% cyclohexane/50% ethyl acetate was selected
to elute the residual fatty acid, selectively. The product was then eluted
by adding around 1% (v/v) acetic acid to the previous eluting system.
The elimination of the residual fatty acid and the recovery of the product
were followed using Kieselgel G 60 Plates and iodine chamber. The
collected fractions containing the product were concentrated using a
rotary evaporator and dissolved again in water for the lyophilisation
step, leading to a white powder. The product purity was assessed by
HPLC-ELSD, LC-MS and proton NMR analyses.
culture medium was used as a positive reference. 200
μL of the cell
culture medium was transferred to a 96-well plate after 72 h incubation.
The absorbance of the samples and standard curve of synthetic melanin
(0 to 500
μ
g/mL) was measured at 450 nm. The inhibition activity (%)
concentration of melanin with the tested molecule
was expressed as
× 100. In order to
concentration of melanin without tested molecule
evaluate the cells viability, the latters were isolated and lysed in PBS
buffer prior concentration determination using a protein assay kit (BCA
Protein Quantitation Kit). The cells viability was expressed as
concentration of proteins with the tested molecule
× 100. The measured melanin con-
concentration of proteins without tested molecule
tents were then normalised by the protein amount and expressed as
μ
g/mg of cell’s proteins. The evaluation was done at least 5 times and
the statistical analysis was done using Student test to compare the results
with the control (XLSTAT software, Addinsoft Inc., Paris, France).
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Influence of substrate concentration on enzymatic activity
In a recent study [23], the ability of the aminoacylases from
S. ambofaciens to catalyse the N-acylation of the amino acids on alpha
amino group position was demonstrated. 10-undecenoic acid is a
mono-unsaturated fatty acid described as having antifungal, antiviral
and insect-repelling activity which makes it useful to treat superficial
infections [25,26]. It was also described as having neuroprotective and
radical-scavenging activity [27]. The N-undecyl-10-enoyl-L-phenylala-
nine (C11’F) generated by the condensation of the phenylalanine with
the 10-undecenoic acid was described as having very interesting prop-
erties for cosmetic applications. However, the enzymatic synthesis of
C11’F has never been reported. In order to study the operational con-
ditions influencing the activity of the aminoacylases from S. ambofaciens
the synthesis of C11’F was used as reference reaction. In this study all
2.5. Analytical methods
2.5.1. Quantitative analyses by HPLC
We monitored the reaction conversion by using the same analytical
method as the one previously described in [23], based on the use of an
HPLC (LC 10 AD-VP, Shimadzu, France) equipped with a UV detector at
214 nm followed by a light-scattering low temperature evaporative de-
tector (Shimadzu, France). Calibrations were performed using a chem-
ically synthetized N-10-unecenoyl-phenylalanine named SepiwhiteTM
MSH kindly provided by SEPPIC, France. The substrate conversion yield
was determined using the following equation: conversion (%) =
(([C11’F] mol/L produced / [C11’] mol/L initial) × 100. We calculated the
309