SYNTHESIS OF DECABORANE BY THE REACTION OF SODIUM UNDECABORATE
1805
and 12 mol of boric acid are formed from 2 mol of
sodium undecaborate:
and foaming were controllable. To the resulting acidic
solution of sodium undecaborate, 1.36 mol of acetone
was added dropwise over a period of 105 min. Then,
after the phase separation, the lower aqueous layer was
discarded, and the upper organic layer was washed with
distilled water (7 × 300 mL). The resulting toluene
solution of decaborane was evaporated to the required
–
2
B H + 36H O → B H
11
14
2
10 14
+
+
12B(OН) + 18H + 14H + 16e–.
(3)
3
2
Thus, in the reaction with various inorganic oxidants
morethanahalfofboronfromthepreviouslysynthesized
undecaborate ion is irretrievably lost. Furthermore,
the process involves formation of a large amount of
harmful waste (manganese, chromium, fluorine, boron
compounds). Introduction of strong inorganic oxidants
into the reaction mixture in the step of oxidation of
undecaborate ion significantly restricts the choice of
the extractant for decaborane, thus complicating its
isolation. As for the solvent replacement step, each of
the suggested procedures (azeotropic distillation of
diglyme with water [13] or treatment with hexane [9])
implies an additional step of diglyme regeneration,
which strongly complicates the process and makes it
much more expensive.
11
concentration and analyzed by В NMR spectroscopy.
To separate the impurity, a 20% solution of
decaborane in toluene (321 g) was charged into a
nitrogen-flushed four-necked flask equipped with a
turbine stirrer, a thermometer, a dropping funnel, and
a reflux condenser. After the temperature of 70°С was
reached, dimethylaniline (140 g) was slowly added
dropwise, with the subsequent gradual heating to 100°С.
The reaction mixture was continuously stirred at this
temperature until the gas evolution ceased. The cooled
reaction mixture was transferred onto a glass frit and
washed with three portions of pure toluene. In so doing,
the impurity passed into the toluene solution. This
solution was evaporated in a water-jet-pump vacuum.
The dry residue was dissolved in n-hexane and analyzed
To eliminate these drawbacks and increase the
yield of the target product by finding an appropriate
oxidant, we performed a thorough detailed chemical
and technological analysis of the decaborane synthesis
by oxidation of alkali metal undecaborates.
11
by В NMR spectroscopy.
The 11B NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker
АМ-360 spectrometer operating at 115.526 MHz. The
chemical shifts are given relative to boron trifluoride
etherate. Alkyl halides (n-bromobutane, -pentane,
-hexane, 98+% purity) and diglyme (99% purity, water
EXPERIMENTAL
content <0.5%) were purchased from Alfa Aesar.
Also, we used chemically pure grade toluene [TU
All the steps of the decaborane synthesis were
performed in one vessel: a 2-L flask with a jacket,
equipped with a stirrer, a thermometer, and a descending
condenser. The reactants were fed with a Masterflex
L/S peristaltic pump (7524-55). The temperature
was controlled with a Huber Unistat 125 thermostat.
Synthesis of sodium undecaborate in diglyme solution
was performed for 8 h at 100–105°С. The diborane
vapor was trapped in a Drechsel bottle filled with
triethylamine and in a U-shaped alcoholic trap. The
synthesis was based on reaction (2); 3.8 mol of alkyl
halide (30% excess) was taken per 3.2 mol of sodium
borohydride. The diglyme volume was 800 mL. After
the 8-h reaction, the mixture was cooled to room
temperature with continuous stirring in an inert gas
stream. Vacuum distillation of diglyme and unchanged
Lewis acid was performed at 85°C/5–7 mm Hg. After
cooling the residue to 20–25°С, 320 mL of toluene
was added, and then 40% sulfuric acid (1600 g) was
carefully added at a rate at which the gas evolution
(
Technical Specification) 2631-020-44493179–98 with
revisions 1, 2, 3], chemically pure grade sulfuric acid
TU 2631-020-44493179–98 with revisions 1, 2, 3),
(
pure grade acetone [GOST (State Standard) 2603–79],
analytically pure grade dimethylaniline (GOST 5855–
78), and analytically pure grade hexane (TU 2631-003-
05807999–98).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Comparative analysis of the above procedures for
preparing sodium undecaborate shows that the reaction
of sodium borohydride with alkyl bromide (С H2n+1Br,
n
where n = 4–6) in diglyme is preferable from the process
viewpoint. We reached the best results with n-butyl
bromide. In addition, this bromide is many times cheaper
than other bromoalkanes. We decided to perform solvent
replacement by vacuum distillation, which allowed us to
recycle the distilled-off diglyme without any additional
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED CHEMISTRY Vol. 90 No. 11 2017