M. Wang et al.
Journal of Solid State Chemistry 298 (2021) 122122
be dissolved in the hyperbranched polymer light-emitting layer to form
an uneven interface with defects in the spin-coating process when the
single light-emitting layer WPLEDs were prepared. As the current density
was continuously increased, the defect area was easily broken-down and
a lot of heat was generated at the same time, which greatly limited the
efficiency and luminance and reduced the stability and lifetime of the
device. It is considered molecular modification would be a promising
strategy to improve thermostability, antioxidative stability, solubility
and hydrophobicity of hyperbranched white light copolymer by intro-
ducing functional groups with hydrophobic properties into the side
chains of hyperbranched polymers.
ꢀC/min under nitrogen atmosphere. Differential scanning calorimetry
(DSC) measurements were performed at both heating and cooling rates of
5
The UV–visible absorption spectra were determined on a Hitachi U-3900
spectrophotometer and the PL spectra were obtained using a Horiba
FluoroMax-4 spectrophotometer at room temperature. Fluorescence
lifetime and fluorescence quantum yield of copolymers were measured
on an Edinburgh Instrument FLS980 spectrometer. Cyclic Voltammetry
of copolymers were measured on an electrochemical workstation of
Shanghai Chenhua Instrument Co. Ltd.
ꢀC/min under nitrogen atmosphere, using DSC QIOO V9.4 apparatus.
Polyhedral oligomericsilsesquioxanes (POSSs) have got considerable
interests in the organic light-emitting diode (OLED) field due to their
excellent thermal stability, oxidation resistance, mechanical toughness,
light transmittance, conductivity, solubility and low surface energy
[16–21]. They are considered as multifunctional groups with excellent
performance because they can combine the advantages of inorganic
materials with those of organic polymers [22,23]. Meanwhile, it is
possible to introduce some special groups into POSSs to modify target
materials [24–27]. Therefore, the POSSs groups were selected as the best
polymer modificators in this work.
In this work, the hyperbranched white-emitting polymers with 2,7-
fluorene branches, spiro[3.3] heptane-2,6-dispirofluorene (SDF) core
(10 mol%), and POSSs modified 2,7-fluorene and DBT as light-dimming
units were constructed. POSSs were introduced into the polymers as
dopant side-chains. The influences of POSSs on their thermal, hydro-
phobicity, photoluminescent (PL) and EL properties were investigated in
detail. It was demonstrated the three-dimensional-structured SDF
exhibited excellent morphological stability and intense fluorescence
[28], and the POSSs group showed significant improvements in
film-forming ability and hydrophobicity. As a consequence, the fabri-
cated devices with synthesized hyperbranched polymers as emission
layers (EMLs) realized good white emission with Commission Inter-
nationale de l’Eclairage (CIE) at (0.32, 0.33) and maximum color
rendering index (CRI) of 96.
2.2. Syntheses
Spiro[3.3]
heptane-2,6-di-(20,2”,70,700-tetrabromospirofluorene)
(TBrSDF) [29–31] and 4,7-bis(2-bromo-5-thienyl)-2,1,3-benzothiadia-
zole (DBrDBT) [32–34] were synthesized according to the published
literature. The synthesis of the precursor with POSSs 6 is shown in
Scheme 1, and the detailed descriptions about 1H NMR and 13C NMR of
the precursors (2–6) are displayed in Figure S1–S7 in supplementary
information.
General Procedure for the Synthesis of copolymers PFSDF10-POSS1,
PFSDF10-POSS5, PFSDF10-POSS10, PFSDF10-POSS20.
To a solution of predetermined amount of monomers (M1, M2, POSSs
and TBrSDF) intoluene (30 mL) was added an aqueous solution (15 mL)
of K2CO3 (2 M), a catalytic amount of Pd(PPh3)4 (0.10 g,0.10 mmol)
under nitrogen. Aliquat 336 (2 mL) in toluene (5 mL) was added as the
phase transfer catalyst. The mixture was vigorously stirred at 100 ꢀC for
72 h. Then DBrDBT (3.20 mL, 2 ꢁ 10ꢂ3 mol/L) was added and the
mixture was continuously stirred at 100 ꢀC for 48 h. Phenylboronic acid
(0.14 g,1.00 mmol) in toluene (10 mL) was then added to the reaction
mixture, followed by stirring at 100 ꢀC for an additional 12 h. Finally,
bromobenzene (2 mL) was added by heating for 12 h again. When
cooling to room temperature, the reaction mixture was washed with 2 M
HCl and water. The organic layer was separated, and the solution was
added dropwise to excess methanol. The precipitated polymers were
collected by filtration and dried under vacuum. The solid was Soxhlet
extracted with acetone for 48 h and then passed through a short chro-
matographic column using toluene as the eluent to afford the polymers.
The detailed descriptions about 1H NMR of the copolymers are displayed
in Figure S8 in supplementary information.
2. Experimental section
2.1. Materials and characterization
PFSDF10-POSS1:M1 (0.37 g, 0.68 mmol), M2 (0.71 g, 1.10 mmol),
TBrSDF (0.14 g, 0.20 mmol), POSSs (0.06 g, 0.02 mmol) and DBrDBT
(3.20 mL, 2 ꢁ 10ꢂ3 mol/L). Gray powder, yield: 48.5%. 1H NMR (600
MHz, CDCl3) δ(ppm):8.08–7.40 (-ArH-), 7.01–6.75 (-ArH-), 3.44–2.92
(–CH2–), 2.66–2.53 (–CH2–), 2.20–1.78 (-C–CH2–), 1.24–1.09 (–CH2–),
1.09–0.94 (–CH3–), 0.94–0.58 (–CH2–).
PFSDF10-POSS5:M1 (0.33 g, 0.60 mmol), M2 (0.71 g, 1.10 mmol),
TBrSDF (0.14 g, 0.2 mmol), POSSs (0.27 g, 0.10 mmol) and DBrDBT
(3.20 mL, 2 ꢁ 10ꢂ3 mol/L). Deep gray powder, yield: 52.6%. 1H NMR
(600 MHz, CDCl3) δ(ppm):7.86–7.29 (-ArH-), 6.93–6.70 (-ArH-),
3.43–2.91 (–CH2–), 2.58–2.31 (–CH2–), 2.16–1.78 (-C–CH2–), 1.24–1.18
(–CH2–),1.18–0.92 (–CH3–), 0.92–0.58 (–CH2–).
Dihydropyran, 2-bromoethanol, p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate,
2,7-dibromofluorene, tetrabutylammonium chloride hydrate, allyl bro-
mide, 5-bromo-1-pentene, 7-bromo-1-heptene, 3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)tri-
methoxysilane,
(3-bromopropyl)trichlorosilane,
2,7-dibromo-9,9-
dioctylfluorene (M1, 99.8%), 9,9-dioctylfluorene-2,7-bis (boronic acid
pinacol ester) (M2, 99.5%), Aliquant336, tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)
palladium, phenylboronic acid, and bromobenzene were purchased from
Energy Chemical company and Synwitech company. Tetrahydrofuran
(THF) and toluene were distilled using standard procedures. Other sol-
vents were used without further purification unless otherwise specified.
All reactions were carried out using Schlenk techniques under a dry ni-
trogen atmosphere.
1HNMR spectra were measured on a Bruker DRX 600 spectrometer,
and chemical shifts were reported in ppm using tetramethyl silane as an
internal standard and using deuterated chloroform (CDCl3), deuterated
acetone (acetone-d6) or deuterated dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO‑d6) as
solvents. Molecular weights and polydispersities of the copolymers were
determined using gel permeation chromatography (GPC) on an HP1100
HPLC system equipped with a 410 differential refractometer, and a
refractive index (RI) detector, with polystyrenes as the standard and THF
as the eluent at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min at 30 ꢀC. Infrared spectra (IR)
were measured on a Bruker Tensor 27 infrared spectrometer with KBr
crystal as the carrier. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements
were performed on a SPA-300HV from Digital Instruments Inc. Ther-
mogravimetric analysis (TGA) of the copolymers was conducted on a
Netzsch TG 209 F3 thermogravimetric analyzer at a heating rate of 10
PFSDF10-POSS10:M1 (0.27 g, 0.50 mmol), M2 (0.71 g, 1.10
mmol), TBrSDF (0.14 g, 0.20 mmol), POSSs (0.54 g, 0.20 mmol) and
DBrDBT (3.20 mL, 2 ꢁ 10ꢂ3 mol/L). Deep gray powder, yield: 46.2%. 1H
NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ(ppm):8.03–7.31 (-ArH-), 6.93–6.80 (-ArH-),
3.45–2.72 (–CH2–), 2.61–2.31 (–CH2–), 2.18–1.77 (-C–CH2–), 1.24–1.18
(–CH2–), 1.18–0.92 (–CH3–), 0.92–0.50 (–CH2–).
PFSDF10-POSS20:M1 (0.16 g, 0.30 mmol), M2 (0.71 g, 1.10
mmol), TBrSDF (0.14 g, 0.20 mmol), POSSs (1.07 g, 0.40 mmol) and
DBrDBT (3.20 mL, 2 ꢁ 10ꢂ3 mol/L). Deep gray powder, yield: 45.3%. 1H
NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ(ppm):8.01–7.42 (-ArH-), 6.94–6.75 (-ArH-),
3.39–2.99 (–CH2–), 2.60–2.35 (–CH2–), 2.18–1.78 (-C–CH2–), 1.23–1.17
(–CH2–), 1.17–0.94 (–CH3–), 0.85–0.62 (–CH2–).
2