In 1959, Jung reported a reaction of cyclohexanone with
enone acids in the presence of KOH, leading to a racemic
bicyclic [3.3.1] compound after 8 days.5 Since this pioneering
work, there have been several other studies on this reaction
and its chemical transformation (eq 1).6 To the best of our
Table 1. Effects of Catalysts on the Reaction of
Cyclohexanone 2a and Enone 3aa
entry
catalyst
time (day)
convb (%)13
eec (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7e
8
1ad
1bd
1c
1d
1e
1f
2
2
80
99
88
85
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3
2
2
2
2
<5
<5
<5
20
61f
53
knowledge, however, none of these investigations has
explored the possibility of the asymmetric reactions. We have
previously developed a pyrrolidine-thiourea 1a7a,c as an
organocatalyst for asymmetric Michael addition. We envi-
sioned that this chiral thiourea7 is a potential catalyst for the
aforementioned reaction. After many attempts, we were
pleased to find that the reaction of cyclohexanone with enone
3a proceeded well to give 2-hydroxy-9-oxo-bicyclo[3.3.1]-
nonane 4a in good conversion with 88% enantiomeric excess
as shown in Scheme 1. The relative configurations have been
1f
23
66
85
90
90
90
90
1g
1h
1i
1i
1i
9
50
99
89
45
10
11g
12h
13d
2
2
1i
99 (80f)
a Unless otherwise noted, all reactions were carried out at room
temperature, cat. 1 (20 mol %), n-butyric acid (20 mol %), 2a (980 mg, 10
mmol), 3a (0.20 mmol). b Determined by 1H NMR. c Determined by chiral
HPLC analysis. d In the presence of 4-methoxybenzonic acid (20 mol %).
e DMSO as a solvent. f Isolated yield. g Without n-butyric acid. h 0 °C.
Scheme 1. Pyrrolidine-thiourea 1a Catalyzed Formal [3+3]
Annulation Reaction
and 2, Table 1). The reaction was very sluggish when proline
derivatives 1c-e8,9 were used (entries 3-5, Table 1).
L-Proline 1f10 worked well but with only 23% ee (entry 7,
Table 1). When 1g11 and 1h12 were employed as the catalysts
(entries 8 and 9, Table 1), moderate conversion and enan-
tioselectivity were observed. To our delight, the product was
obtained in 99% conversion with 90% ee when N-(pyrrolidin-
2-ylmethyl)trifluoromethanesulfonamide 1i12 was used in the
presence of 20 mol % of n-butyric acid (entry 10, Table 1).
determined by X-ray diffration analysis on compound 4a (see
the Supporting Information). To further improve the conver-
sion and enantioselectivity, several L-proline derivatives 1a-i
(Figure 1) have been screened and the results were sum-
(7) (a) Vicario, J. L.; Bad´ıa, D.; Carrillo, L. Synthesis 2007, 2065. (b)
Cao, C.-L.; Sun, X.-L.; Zhou, J.-L.; Tang, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 4073.
(c) Cao, Y.-J.; Lai, Y.-Y.; Wang, X.; Li, Y.-J.; Xiao, W.-J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2007, 48, 21. (d) Cao, C.-L.; Ye, M.-C.; Sun, X.-L.; Tang, Y. Org.
Lett. 2006, 8, 2901. (e) Tsogoeva, S. B.; Wei, S. Chem. Commun. 2006,
1451.
(8) (a) Samanta, S.; Zhao, C.-G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7442. (b)
Samanta, S.; Zhao, C.-G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 45, 3383.
(9) (a) Dine´r, P.; Nielsen, M.; Marigo, M.; Jørgensen, K. A. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1983. (b) Vesely, J.; Ibrahem, I.; Zhao, G.-L.;
Rios, R.; Co´rdova, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 778. (c) Chi, Y.;
Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6804. (d) Ibrahem, I.; Co´rdova,
A. Chem. Commun. 2006, 1760. (e) Marigo, M.; Wabnitz, T. C.; Fielenbach,
D.; Jørgensen, K. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 794. (f) Hayashi,
Y.; Gotoh, H.; Hayashi, T.; Shoji, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44,
4212. (g) Marigo, M.; Fielenbach, D.; Braunton, A.; Kjaersgaard, A.;
Jørgensen, K. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3703.
Figure 1. Organocatalysts screened.
(10) (a) Utsumi, N.; Zhang, H.-L.; Tanaka, F.; Barbas, C. F., III Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1878. (b) Samanta, S.; Zhao, C.-G. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 7442. (c) Mauksch, M.; Tsogoeva, S. B.; Martynova, I.
M.; Wei, S.-W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 393. (d) Ward, D. E.;
Jheengut, V.; Akinnusi, O. L. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1181. (e) Ward, D. E.;
Jheengut, V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 8347. (f) Enders, D.; Seki, A.
Synlett 2002, 1, 26. (g) List, B.; Pojarliev, P.; Martin, H. J. Org. Lett. 2001,
3, 2423. (h) list, B.; Lerner, R. A.; Barbas, C. F., III J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 2395. (i) List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9336.
(11) (a) Reyes, E.; Vicario, J. L.; Badia, D.; Carrillo, L. Org. Lett. 2006,
8, 6135. (b) Aggarwal, V. K.; Lopin, C.; Sandrinelli, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 7596. (c) Bailey, D. J.; O’Hagan, D.; Tavasli, M. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1997, 8, 149.
marized in Table 1. It was found that both pyrrolidine-
thiourea 1a and pyrrolidine-urea 1b could promote this
reaction in good conversion with high ee values (entries 1
(5) Jung, L. Hebd Seances Acad. Sci. 1959, 249, 711.
(6) (a) Hong, B.-C.; Wu, M.-F.; Tseng, H.-C.; Liao, J.-H. Org. Lett. 2006,
8, 2217. (b) Peters, J. A. Synthesis 1979, 321. (c) Nenajdenko, V. G.;
Druzhinin, S. V.; Balenkova, E. S. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2004, 53, 435. (d)
Jung, L. Bull. Soc. Chim. 1967, 4696. (e) Jung, L. Hebd Seances Acad.
Sci. Ser C 1967, 265, 34.
4152
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 21, 2007