Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
Table 1: Selectivity in the reduction of enone 10.
tated by the failure of a planned Lewis acid mediated
tetrahydrofuran ring opening that had worked on simpler
model systems. This oxidation needed to be heavily opti-
mized[15] before we arrived at the conditions shown (Fieserꢀs
reagent in MeNO2), which provided 13 in 38% yield over the
two steps.[20] An overall efficient five-step sequence was
carried out to open the lactone to differentiated diol 14, the
primary alcohol of which was oxidized to permit aldol
condensation to close the final ring in 15. The cross-
conjugated dienolate derived from enone 15 was methylated
at C15 with a moderate axial preference; after enone
hydrogenation/benzyl ether hydrogenolysis and oxidation of
the C7 alcohol, base-mediated equilibration afforded the
Corey dione (5). Access to this target, which completes
a formal synthesis of DICA, was achieved in a total of 18 steps
from 7,[21] but with only eight chromatographic purifications
and with excellent relative stereochemical control at all eight
centers of the perhydropyrene scaffold.
Having successfully procured the Corey dione in racemic
form, we aimed to render the synthesis asymmetric. The
choice of cyclohexenone 7 as a starting material was inten-
tional to take advantage of our groupꢀs experience with the
organocatalytic asymmetric Robinson annulation, which had
served well in our kalihinol B synthesis.[2,13] Unfortunately, we
could not uncover conditions for efficient ring-closing aldol
condensations without significant erosion of enantiopurity,
and an alternative entry to the asymmetric manifold was
sought (Scheme 3).
Entry
Reduction Conditions
Yield [%][a]
11/12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Li, NH3, THF (À408C)
Na, NH3, THF (À788C)
K, NH3, THF (À788C)
64
85
82
80
92
86
94
93
93
1:2
1:1
1:1
1:3
1:5
<1:20
6:1
8:1
15:1
K, t-BuOH, NH3, THF (À788C)
Karstedt, Et3SiH (708C)[b]
t-BuCu, DIBAl, HMPA, THF (À508C)
H2, Pd/C, EtOAc
H2, Rh/alumina, EtOAc[c]
H2, Rh/C, EtOAc[c]
[a] Yields of isolated product after column chromatography. [b] Followed
by TBAF, THF. [c] i. 400–500 psi H2 ii. PCC, Celite, CH2Cl2 (to reoxidize
any undesired alcohol formed). Karstedt=platinum(0)-1,3-divinyl-
1,1,3,3-tetramethyldisiloxane complex, DIBAl=diisobutylaluminum hy-
dride, TBAF=tetrabutylammonium fluoride, PCC=pyridinium chloro-
chromate.
to the discovery that reductions with Rh/C were highly trans-
selective (d.r. 15:1).
The crude trans-fused hydrogenation product, which
contained some over-reduced C20 alcohol, was oxidized to
the lactone/ketone 13 (Scheme 2).[19] The moderate yield of
the oxidation accounts for virtually all of the losses in the two-
stage process. This ether-to-lactone oxidation was necessi-
Scheme 2. Synthesis of the Corey dione (5). Reagents and conditions:
g) 500 psi H2, cat. Rh/C, EtOAc; h) CrO3, aq. AcOH, MeNO2, 38%
over 2 steps; i) cat. TsOH, ethylene glycol, Dean–Stark, benzene
(reflux); j) LiAlH4, THF (08C!RT); k) TrCl, NEt3, cat. DMAP, DCE
(708C); l) KH, BnCl, cat. TBAI, THF (508C); m) cat. TsOH, cat. PPTS,
aq. acetone (708C), 75% over 5 steps; n) DMP, NaHCO3, CH2Cl2;
o) cat. TsOH, Hickman still, benzene (reflux), 72% over 2 steps;
p) LDA, MeI, HMPA, THF (À788C!RT), 85%; q) 900 psi H2, cat. Pd/
C, EtOAc; r) PCC, Celite, CH2Cl2; NaOH, MeOH (508C), 65% yield
over 2 steps. Tr =triphenylmethyl, DMAP=4-dimethylaminopyridine,
DCE=1,2-dichloroethane, Bn=benzyl, TBAI=tetrabutylammonium
iodide, PPTS=pyridinium para-toluenesulfonate, DMP=Dess–Martin
periodinane, LDA=lithium diisopropylamide.
Scheme 3. Chiral-pool synthesis of dihydronaphthalene (À)-9.
Reagents and conditions: a) TBSOTf, NEt3, CH2Cl2 (08C); b) m-CPBA,
aq. NaHCO3, Et2O; c) NaIO4, aq. HF, MeCN, 62% over 3 steps;
d) ArMgBr, cat. CuI·2LiCl, THF (À788C!RT) then HMPA,
BrCH2CO2Et; e) LiAlH4, Et2O (08C!RT), 37% yield over 2 steps;
f) TsCl, pyridine (408C), 83%; g) mCPBA, NaHCO3, CH2Cl2; h) cat.
TsOH, Hickman still, benzene (reflux), 60% yield over 2 steps.
TBSOTf=tert-butyldimethylsilyl triflate, mCPBA=meta-chloroperoxy-
benzoic acid.
7182
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 7180 –7183