Iridium(I)-Catalyzed α-C(sp3)-H Alkylation of Saturated Azacycles

Article abstract of DOI:10.1021/jacs.9b12320

Saturated azacycles are commonly encountered in bioactive compounds and approved therapeutic agents. The development of methods for functionalization of the α-methylene C-H bonds of these highly privileged building blocks is of great importance, especially in drug discovery. While much effort has been dedicated toward this goal by using a directed C-H activation approach, the development of directing groups that are both general as well as practical remains a significant challenge. Herein, the design and development of novel amidoxime directing groups is described for Ir(I)-catalyzed α-C(sp³)-H alkylation of saturated azacycles using readily available olefins as coupling partners. This protocol extends the scope of saturated azacycles to piperidines, azepane, and tetrahydroisoquinoline that are incompatible with our previously reported directing group. A variety of olefin coupling partners, including previously unreactive disubstituted terminal olefins and internal olefins, are compatible with this transformation. The selectivity for a branched α-C(sp³)-alkylation product is also observed for the first time when acrylate is used as the reaction partner. The development of practical, one-step installation and removal protocols further adds to the utility of amidoxime directing groups.

Full text of DOI:10.1021/jacs.9b12320

Subscriber access provided by La Trobe University Library
Article
3
Iridium(I)-catalyzed #-C(sp)–H Alkylation of Saturated Azacycles
Pritha Verma, Jeremy M. Richter, Nikita Chekshin, Jennifer X Qiao, and Jin-Quan Yu
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b12320 • Publication Date (Web): 25 Feb 2020
Downloaded from pubs.acs.org on February 26, 2020
Just Accepted
“Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted
online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical
Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination
of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in
full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully
peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the
Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore,
the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After
a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web
site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes
to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and
ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or
consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W.,
Washington, DC 20036
Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society.
However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works
produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course
of their duties.

Page 1 of 26
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
Iridium(I)-catalyzed α-C(sp3)–H Alkylation of Saturated Azacycles
5
6
7
Pritha Verma,† Jeremy M. Richter,‡ Nikita Chekshin,† Jennifer X. Qiao,δ and Jin-Quan Yu†,*
8
9
†Department of Chemistry, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Road, La
Jolla, California 92037, United States
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
‡Research & Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Hopewell, New Jersey 08534, United States
δDiscovery Chemistry, Bristol-Myers Squibb, PO Box 4000, Princeton, New Jersey 08543,
United States
ABSTRACT
Saturated azacycles are commonly encountered in bioactive compounds and approved
therapeutic agents. The development of methods for functionalization of the α-methylene C‒H
bonds of these highly privileged building blocks is of great importance, especially in drug
discovery. While much effort has been dedicated towards this goal by using a directed C‒H
activation approach, the development of directing groups that are both general, as well as
practical, remains a significant challenge. Herein, the design and development of novel amidoxime
directing groups is described for Ir(I)-catalyzed α-C(sp3)‒H alkylation of saturated azacycles using
readily available olefins as coupling partners. This protocol extends the scope of saturated
azacycles to piperidines, azepane, and tetrahydroisoquinoline that are incompatible with our
previously reported directing group. A variety of olefin coupling partners, including previously
unreactive di-substituted terminal olefins and internal olefins, are compatible with this
transformation. The selectivity for a branched α-C(sp3)-alkylation product is also observed for the
first time when acrylate is used as the reaction partner. The development of practical, one-step
installation and removal protocols further add to the utility of amidoxime directing groups.
1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 2 of 26
1
2
3
4
INTRODUCTION
5
6
7
8
9
Saturated azacycles constitute a prevalent structural motif in bioactive natural products and
pharmaceutical compounds (Figure 1).1 The development of methods that enable rapid synthesis
and late-stage diversification of these heterocycles is appealing from the standpoint of drug
discovery.2 Not surprisingly, a variety of methods have been developed for the functionalization
of C(sp3)‒H bonds adjacent to nitrogen in saturated azacycles.3 Important progress has been made
in the direct functionalization of these heterocycles through iminium ion,4 α-amino carbanion,5 α-
amino radical,6 carbene insertion7, and other innovative pathways.8 Functionalizations proceeding
via transition-metal-catalyzed α-C(sp3)‒H bond activation have also been developed.9-16 These
transformations usually entail the installation of a directing group on the azacycle nitrogen for
recruitment of the transition-metal catalyst near to the α-C(sp3)‒H bond of interest.17 Although
additional steps are required for the installation and eventual removal of the directing group, a
directed C‒H activation approach offers important advantages over other methods.4-8 First,
regioselectivity can be controlled in the presence of multiple equally reactive C‒H bonds; for
example, when more than one amino-alkyl groups are present within the substrate. Second, the
formation of a discrete carbon‒metal bond in the intermediate allows for diverse transformations
that may not be possible with other approaches.4-8 Third, the directing group can be used as a
functional handle for modulating the reactivity and selectivity of a transformation, thus allowing
access to different isomers of the product.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 26
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Figure 1. Some biologically significant compounds containing α-alkylated saturated
azacycles.
In the realm of transition-metal-catalyzed directed α-C(sp3)‒H activation of saturated
azacycles, several arylation transformations have been developed.9 In 2014, our group reported the
first example of a palladium(II)-catalyzed directed α-arylation of saturated azacycles using aryl
boronic acids as coupling partners (Scheme 1A).18 Our efforts towards developing an alkylation
transformation using alkyl boronic acids as coupling partners have met with limited success;19
possibly due to a challenging sp3‒sp3 reductive elimination and competing β-hydride elimination
side reactions from the corresponding metal-alkyl intermediate. In contrast, iridium(I)-catalyzed
α-alkylation using olefins as coupling partners is a promising approach.20 Such alkylation reactions
proceed via the intermediacy of a metal-hydride species, which reacts with olefin coupling partners
to affect a net alkylation transformation (Scheme 1B).
3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 4 of 26
1
2
3
4
Scheme 1. Palladium(II)- and Iridium(I)-catalyzed Directed α-C(sp3)‒H Activation
5
6
Reactions of Saturated Azacycles. DG = Directing Group.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
In 1998, Jun et al. reported the first example of a directed α-C(sp3)–H alkylation of
benzylamines using a ruthenium(0) catalyst.10a Later in 2001, a ruthenium-catalyzed directed α-
C(sp3)–H alkylation of saturated azacycles was reported by Murai and co-workers.10b In 2011,
the first example of an iridium-catalyzed directed α-C(sp3)–H alkylation of aliphatic amines was
developed by Shibata and co-workers.11a Since these pioneering studies, several groups have
developed directed approaches for α-C(sp3)–H alkylation of saturated azacycles via ruthenium10c-
e and iridium catalysis11b-g (Scheme 2A). However, the utility of these approaches is limited due
to the use of heterocyclic directing groups which require multiple steps and harsh reducing
reaction conditions for their removal. Additionally, over-alkylation has been a frequently
encountered problem.
Recently, our group reported an alkoxy-thiocarbonyl directing group for α-C(sp3)–H
alkylation of saturated azacycles using a cationic iridium(I) catalyst (Scheme 2B).21 Although the
one-step installation and removal of this directing group was advantageous over previous reports
4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 26
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
employing heterocyclic directing groups, the synthetic utility of the transformation was limited for
the following reasons. First, while pyrrolidines could be alkylated in moderate yields, the
alkylation of other azacycles proved to be challenging. Second, the olefin coupling partner scope
was limited to only mono-substituted olefins. Third, the alkoxy-thiocarbonyl directing group
promoted over-alkylation.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Scheme 2. Evolution of Directing Groups for Transition-metal-catalyzed α-C(sp3)‒H
Alkylation of Amines with Olefin Coupling Partners.
These limitations highlight the challenge associated with designing a practical, as well as
a general directing group. Herein, we disclose the design and discovery of novel amidoxime
directing groups for an iridium(I)-catalyzed α-C(sp3)–H alkylation of saturated azacycles (Scheme
5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 6 of 26
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2C). The amidoxime directing groups are compatible with a wide range of saturated azacycles and
olefin coupling partners, while also being easy to install and remove. During our study, we
observed an unprecedented selectivity for branched α-C(sp3)-alkylation products with ethyl
acrylate as the olefin coupling partner.22 This observation showcases one of the advantages of
using a directed C‒H activation approach, wherein a new directing group may impact the reactivity
of the catalytic intermediate, thus enabling access to new mechanistic pathways and products.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
We designed the amidoxime directing groups (Scheme 3) based on the following
considerations: 1) an imine moiety to direct the metal insertion, inspired by the high reactivity
afforded by heterocyclic directing groups in Scheme 2A, 2) amidoxime moiety to allow easy
removal under mild conditions (in comparison with previous reports of amidine directing groups5a,
9a), and 3) a modular α-substituent which can be tuned to improve the reactivity and selectivity.
Scheme 3. Design Principles of Amidoxime Directing Groups.
Borrowing reaction conditions from our previous work on iridium(I)-catalyzed α-alkylation of
pyrrolidines with an alkoxy-thiocarbamate directing group,21 we evaluated various amidoxime
directing groups using pyrrolidine as the model substrate and ethyl acrylate as the olefin coupling
partner (Table 1). We began our studies with an α-methyl substituted O-benzyl amidoxime
directing group and obtained the α-alkylated product in a total yield of 29% (2a-1) as a mixture of
branched (B) and linear (L) regioisomers. Keeping the oxime moiety constant, we changed the α-
6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 26
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
substituent of the directing group to a bulkier tert-butyl group and observed an increase in the total
yield to 67% (2a-2). The introduction of an electron-withdrawing trifluoromethyl group as the α-
substituent further increased the total yield to 86% (2a-3). On the other hand, using a
perfluoroethyl group as the α-substituent lowered the total yield to 60% (2a-4). Next, we varied
the oxime moiety while fixing the α-substituent as a trifluoromethyl group. Changing the benzyl
oxime to a sterically bulky trityl oxime lowered the total yield to 60% (2a-5). Next, we altered the
electronics of the oxime moiety by using a para-nitro benzyl oxime which gave a slightly lower
total yield of 81% (2a-6) as compared to the simple benzyl oxime. Increasing the electron-
withdrawing nature of the oxime moiety further by using a perfluorobenzyl oxime reduced the
total yield to 48% (2a-7). In order to test the importance of a pendant benzyl oxime unit, we tied
it into a benzoxazole heterocycle and observed a drop in the total yield to 40% (2a-8). Increasing
the coordination ability of the pendant oxime unit with a weakly coordinating ester afforded
product in 70% total yield (2a-9), while a strongly coordinating pyridine completely shut down
the reaction (2a-10). Next, reaction using an O-phenyl amidoxime directing group suffered from
poor mass balance and no desired product was observed (2a-11). Employing a tert-butanesulfinyl
imine as the directing group did not give any product (2a-12). We next screened the reaction
conditions with trifluoromethyl O-benzyl amidoxime as the optimal directing group, and were able
to lower the catalyst loading to 5 mol% and the ethyl acrylate loading to 4 equivalents to afford a
total yield of 83% (2a-3’) of α-alkylated pyrrolidine products. As seen from Table 1, the
regioisomeric product ratio was found to be dependent on the structure of the directing group.
Attempts at improving the regioisomeric product ratio by further screening of the reaction
conditions were unsuccessful. Moreover, the regioisomeric ratio was affected by the identity of
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 8 of 26
1
2
3
4
5
6
solvent, the catalyst counteranion, and the diene ligand on iridium (see the Supporting Information
for details).
7
8
9
Table 1. Directing Group Evaluation for α-C(sp3)‒H Alkylation of Pyrrolidine.a,b
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
aReaction conditions: 1a-1 to 1a-11 (0.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv), Ir(cod)2OTf (0.01 mmol, 0.1 equiv),
ethyl acrylate (0.8 mmol, 8.0 equiv), degassed PhCl (0.5 mL), 85 °C, under Ar, 6 h. bYields were
determined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude products using mesitylene as the internal standard.
d
e
c0.05 equiv of Ir(cod)2OTf (0.005 mmol). 4.0 equiv of ethyl acrylate (0.4 mmol). 0.1 mL of
degassed PhCl. fYield after isolation by chromatography is shown.
8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 26
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
We then tested the trifluoromethyl O-benzyl amidoxime directing group against a variety of
substituted pyrrolidine substrates (Table 2). When ethyl acrylate was used as the olefin coupling
partner, separable mixtures of branched and linearly α-alkylated products were obtained (2b-2i),
the ratios of which were dependent on the nature of substituents on the pyrrolidine substrates. On
the other hand, when 1-hexene was used as the olefin coupling partner, only linearly α-alkylated
products were obtained (2j-2m). With ethyl acrylate as the olefin coupling partner, 2-methyl and
2-phenyl substituted pyrrolidine substrates afforded products in total yields of 80% (2b) and 83%
(2c), respectively. A benzyl protected proline substrate was also compatible and afforded product
in a total yield of 68% (2d). Spirocyclic and bicyclic pyrrolidine substrates, which are relevant to
various medicinal chemistry campaigns,23 reacted in good yields of 98% (2e) and 80% (2f),
respectively. Pyrrolidine substrates with 3-alkyl substituents also reacted in good yields (2g, 2h).
On the other hand, an electron deficient 3,3-difluoropyrrolidine substrate gave a low yield of 36%
(2i). With 1-hexene as the olefin coupling partner, 3-phenyl, 3-alkyl, 3-methoxy, and 3-amino
substituted pyrrolidine substrates afforded products in 73% (2j), 86% (2k), 66% (2l), and 77%
(2m) yields, respectively. We were pleased to find that the use of trifluoromethyl O-benzyl
amidoxime directing group (with adequate substrate-specific tuning of the reaction conditions)
prevented over-alkylation of a variety of substituted pyrrolidine substrates, thus addressing one of
the major limitations with previous directing group designs.9,10
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 10 of 26
1
2
3
4
Table 2. Pyrrolidine Substrate Scope.a,b
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
aReaction conditions: 1b to 1m (0.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv), Ir(cod)2NTf2 (0.01 mmol, 0.1 equiv), ethyl
b
acrylate (0.8 mmol, 8.0 equiv), degassed PhCl (0.1 mL), 85 °C, under Ar, 24 h. Yields after
c
d
isolation by chromatography are shown. Ir(cod)2OTf instead of Ir(cod)2NTf2. 0.1 equiv of
HBF4.Et2O (0.01 mmol) as additive. e0.05 equiv of Ir(cod)2OTf (0.005 mmol). f12 h instead of 24
h. g48 h instead of 24 h.
10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 11 of 26
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Having established the scope of pyrrolidine substrates with the trifluoromethyl O-benzyl
amidoxime directing group, we next investigated the scope of olefin coupling partners using 3,3-
dimethyl pyrrolidine (1g) as the standard substrate (Table 3). Olefins with a wide variety of steric
and electronic properties proved to be efficient coupling partners. A wide range of styrene
analogues, including 4-bromostyrene, afforded the respective linearly α-alkylated products in good
yields of 66%-81% (3a-3i). Electron deficient olefins such as vinyl phthalimide and ethyl vinyl
ketone also proceeded to give linearly α-alkylated products in 78% (3j) and 65% (3k) yields,
respectively. Alternate ester protecting groups on the acrylate were well tolerated (3l) to give a
mixture of branched and linearly α-alkylated regioisomeric products. However, vinyl acetate
reacted in a low yield of 32% (3m) to give linearly α-alkylated product. Electron neutral olefins
all gave their corresponding linearly α-alkylated products selectively. While allylbenzene (3n)
reacted in a moderate yield of 51%, allyl silane, vinyl silane, and 1-hexene reacted in good yields
of 71% (3o), 74% (3p), and 73% (3q), respectively. When vinyl norbornene was used as the olefin
coupling partner, the reaction occurred regioselectively at the vinyl position in 73% yield (3r).
Moreover, a selectivity of 6.1:1 was observed in favor of the endo-isomer over the exo-isomer of
vinyl norbornene. In contrast, in the absence of a vinyl group, simple norbornene reacted in 78%
yield (3s). The reaction also tolerated di-substituted terminal olefins in moderate yields of 55%
(3t) and 50% (3u), respectively. When cis-2-hexene was used as the olefin coupling partner, an
isomerized linear product was obtained in a moderate yield of 51% (3v). We also observed
isomerization of methyl crotonate to give a linear product, albeit in a low yield of 35% (3w).24 A
sterically hindered maleate ester also reacted in 23% yield (3x). To the best of our knowledge, this
is the first example of an iridium(I)-catalyzed α-C(sp3)‒H alkylation reaction which can utilize di-
substituted terminal olefins and internal olefins as effective coupling partners.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 12 of 26
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Table 3. Olefin Coupling Partner Scope.a,b
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
aReaction conditions: 1g (0.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv), Ir(cod)2NTf2 (0.01 mmol, 0.1 equiv), olefin
b
coupling partner (0.8 mmol, 8.0 equiv), degassed PhCl (0.1 mL), 85 °C, under Ar, 48 h. Yields
after isolation by chromatography are shown. c1a instead of 1g. dmono:di = 4:1. emono:di = 7.5:1.
12
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 13 of 26
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
After establishing the performance of the trifluoromethyl O-benzyl amidoxime directing group
with a variety of substituted pyrrolidine substrates and olefin coupling partners, we next tested the
efficacy of this directing group for azacycles of other ring sizes (Scheme 4). When we subjected
the azetidine substrate (1n) to the optimized reaction conditions with ethyl acrylate as the olefin
coupling partner, no product was observed. The piperidine substrate afforded a linearly α-alkylated
product in a low yield of 25% (2o). In contrast, the azepane substrate reacted in a good yield of
70% (2p) and afforded a mixture of separable branched and linearly α-alkylated regioisomers. A
similar reactivity trend has been observed in previous reports where piperidines were found to be
a more challenging class of substrates than pyrrolidines and azepanes.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Scheme 4. Evaluation of the Trifluoromethyl O-Benzyl Amidoxime Directing Group for α-
C(sp3)‒H Alkylation of Azetidine, Piperidine, and Azepane.
aYield was determined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude product using mesitylene as the internal
standard. bYield after isolation by chromatography is shown.
We reasoned that a lower reactivity for the piperidine substrate (2o) relative to the pyrrolidine
and azepane substrates might be associated with an unfavorable conformation of the six-membered
saturated azacycle. This led us to consider that a different directing group might be required for
13
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 14 of 26
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
the piperidine substrate. Leveraging the modular nature of the amidoxime directing groups, we re-
evaluated directing groups for the piperidine substrate as shown in Table 4. Under the optimized
reaction conditions, with ethyl acrylate as the olefin coupling partner, changing the α-substituent
to a perfluoroethyl group had deleterious effect on reactivity (4a-1). On the other hand, a variety
of alkyl groups such as, methyl (4a-2), ethyl (4a-3), and isobutyl (4a-4), all worked as efficient α-
substituents and gave a mixture of branched and linearly α-alkylated regioisomers in moderate
yields. A bulkier alkyl α-substituent in the directing group led to a higher yield of the linearly α-
alkylated regioisomer. We selected methyl O-benzyl amidoxime as the optimal directing group for
piperidines because we anticipated that a smaller directing group would have an easier removal
protocol.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Table 4. Directing Group Evaluation for α-C(sp3)‒H Alkylation of Piperidine.a,b
aReaction conditions: 4a-1 to 4a-4 (0.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv), [Ir(cod)Cl]2 (0.005 mmol, 0.05 equiv),
AgOTf (0.01 mmol, 0.1 equiv), ethyl acrylate (0.8 mmol, 8.0 equiv), HBF4.Et2O (0.01 mmol, 0.1
b
1
equiv), degassed PhCl (0.5 mL), 85 °C, under Ar, 24 h. Yields were determined by H NMR
analysis of the crude products using mesitylene as the internal standard.
14
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 15 of 26
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
With the optimal directing group for piperidine in hand, we further optimized the reaction
conditions using 1-hexene as the olefin coupling partner (see the Supporting Information for
details). As shown in Table 5, simple piperidine reacted to give a separable mixture of mono- and
di-alkylated products in a total yield of 65% (5b). Next, we tested the methyl O-benzyl amidoxime
directing group against a variety of substituted piperidine substrates (5c-5j). 3-Methyl piperidine
substrate reacted to give mono-alkylated product in 72% yield (5c). 4-Methyl and 4-phenyl
substituted piperidine substrates also reacted in 82% (5d) and 62% (5e) yields, respectively, giving
a mixture of separable mono- and di-alkylated products. Piperidine substrates containing various
functional groups such as 4-methoxy (5f), 4-amino (5g), 3-trifluoromethyl (5h), and 3-ester (5i)
were also compatible and reacted in moderate to good yields. A spirocyclic piperidine substrate
yielded a separable mixture of mono- and di-alkylated products in a total yield of 58% (5j).
Tetrahydroisoquinoline was also a compatible substrate and reacted to give di-alkylated product
in 53% yield (5k). 3-Methyl morpholine was a challenging substrate and gave the corresponding
mono-alkylated product in a low yield of 20% (5l). However, complete site-selectivity was
achieved for the α-C(sp3)‒H bonds next to the nitrogen atom in the presence of the α-C(sp3)‒H
next to an oxygen atom. Finally, the di-alkylation favored anti-stereochemistry; where 5b-di, 5d-
di, and 5k were isolated as single diastereomers (see the Supporting Information for details on
diastereoselectivity).
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
15
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 16 of 26
1
2
3
4
Table 5. Piperidine Substrate Scope.a,b
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
aReaction conditions: 4b to 4l (0.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv), [Ir(cod)Cl]2 (0.005 mmol, 0.05 equiv),
AgSbF6 (0.01 mmol, 0.1 equiv), 1-hexene (0.8 mmol, 8.0 equiv), degassed PhCl (2.0 mL), 85 °C,
c
under Ar, 24 h. bYields after isolation by chromatography are shown. 0.1 equiv of Ir(cod)2NTf2
(0.01 mmol) instead of [Ir(cod)Cl]2 and AgSbF6. d48 h instead of 24 h.
Scheme 5A shows the one-step installation protocols developed for both the
trifluoromethyl O-benzyl amidoxime and the methyl O-benzyl amidoxime directing groups
16
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 17 of 26
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
starting from precursors 6 and 7 (see the Supporting Information for details). These precursors
were used for the synthesis of the azacycle substrates (1a-3, 1b-1p, 4a-2, 4b-4l) in a divergent
manner. Scheme 5B shows the removal protocols for two representative products, 2k and 5h. Both
the directing groups were cleaved effectively under DIBAL-H reduction at 0 °C in a single step.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Scheme 5. Installation and Removal of Amidoxime Directing Groups.a
aReaction conditions: (a) Azacycle (1.0 equiv), 6 (1.2 equiv), triethylamine (1.2 equiv), DCM, 50
°C, under air, 12 h. (b) Azacycle (1.0 equiv), 7 (1.2 equiv), DMF, 70 °C, under air, 12 h. (c) 2k or
5h (0.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv), DIBAL-H (0.5 mmol, 5.0 equiv), toluene (0.5 mL), 0 °C, under N2, 30
min. (d) CbzCl (0.3 mmol, 3.0 equiv), Et3N (0.3 mmol, 3.0 equiv), DCM (1.0 mL), rt, under N2,
12 h.
17
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 18 of 26
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Due to the observation of unconventional branch-selective α-alkylation with acrylates, we
performed deuterium labelling experiments (Scheme 6). When substrate 1a-3 was subjected to the
reaction conditions in the presence of D2O and in the absence of an olefin coupling partner,
deuterium incorporation at the α- and α’-positions of the pyrrolidine substrate was observed
(Scheme 6A). This result implies that the α-C(sp3)‒H bond of 1a-3 is cleaved under the present
reaction conditions, without the involvement of an olefin coupling partner. Next, the reaction of
substrate 1a-3 with deuterated benzyl acrylate was examined (Scheme 6B). Incorporation of
deuterium atoms was detected at the α- and α’-positions of both the branched and linearly alkylated
products (3y-B, 3y-L). Moreover, the recovered benzyl acrylate coupling partner was found to
have a reduced deuterium content. These observations indicate that the catalytic cycle consists of
reversible C‒H bond activation and olefin insertion steps. The experimentally observed
isomerization of internal olefins to give linearly α-alkylated products (3v, 3w) lends further support
for a reversible olefin insertion step.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Scheme 6. Deuterium labelling experiments.
18
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 19 of 26
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
On the basis of the above labelling experiments, the proposed mechanism for the
amidoxime-directed Ir(I)-catalyzed α-C(sp3)‒H alkylation reaction of pyrrolidine with an acrylate
coupling partner is shown in Scheme 7. Since the reaction yield and selectivity were found to be
dependent on the diene ligand (see the Supporting Information), it is likely that one unit of the
diene ligand remains coordinated to iridium.25 The first step involves the directed α-C‒H activation
of the pyrrolidine substrate via an oxidative addition mechanism, leading to the formation of a
cationic Ir(III) intermediate. Next, a molecule of acrylate may react reversibly with this iridium-
hydride species in two different ways - thus giving rise to Pathways L and B. In Pathway L, acrylate
undergoes a sterically-controlled 1,2-migratory insertion into the Ir‒H bond, leading to a linear Ir-
alkyl species, which upon a C‒C reductive elimination gives the linearly α-alkylated product. In
Pathway B, acrylate undergoes an electronically-controlled 2,1-migratory insertion into the Ir‒H
bond leading to a branched Ir-alkyl species, which upon a C‒C reductive elimination gives the
branched α-alkylated product.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Scheme 7. Proposed Mechanistic Pathways.
19
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 20 of 26
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
CONCLUSION
8
9
In summary, we report the design and discovery of novel amidoxime directing groups for
the iridium(I)-catalyzed α-C(sp3)‒H alkylation of saturated azacycles using readily available
olefins as coupling partners. A trifluoromethyl O-benzyl amidoxime directing group was
developed for substituted pyrrolidines, proline, and azepane substrates. This transformation is
applicable on wide arrays of olefin coupling partners with diverse steric and electronic properties,
including previously unreactive di-substituted terminal olefins and internal olefins. For more
challenging substrates, such as substituted piperidines and tetrahydroisoquinoline, a methyl O-
benzyl amidoxime directing group was developed. The selectivity for a branched α-C(sp3)‒H
alkylation product is observed for the first time when acrylate was used as the reaction partner.
New protocols enabling practical, one-step installation and removal of these directing groups were
also developed. Future work from our group will focus on developing enantioselective α-C(sp3)‒
H alkylation of saturated azacycles and on exploiting the potential of amidoxime directing groups
for other interesting substrates and transformations.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
A 2-dram vial was charged with the substrate (0.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and taken inside an argon
glovebox. Ir(cod)2NTf2 (6.9 mg, 0.01 mmol, 0.1 equiv, unless otherwise noted) was added
followed by a magnetic stir bar. The vial was sealed with a PTFE septum and taken out of the
glovebox. Degassed PhCl (0.1 mL, unless otherwise noted) and olefin coupling partner (0.8 mmol,
8.0 equiv, unless otherwise noted) were added to the vial. The solution was stirred at 85 °C for 24
hours (unless otherwise noted). Upon completion, the reaction mixture was cooled to rt and diluted
20
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 21 of 26
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
with 2 mL EtOAc. The mixture was filtered through a pad of celite. The celite was washed
thoroughly with EtOAc and the combined organics were concentrated in vacuo. The crude reside
was purified by preparative TLC to provide the alkylated product(s).
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI:
Detailed experimental procedures and characterization of new compounds (PDF)
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
*yu200@scripps.edu
ORCID
Jin-Quan Yu: 0000-0003-3560-5774
Pritha Verma: 0000-0003-1162-775X
Nikita Chekshin: 0000-0002-9687-3310
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We gratefully acknowledge The Scripps Research Institute, the NIH (NIGMS, R01 GM084019),
and Bristol-Myers Squibb for financial support. We thank Dr. Jason Chen, Ms. Brittany Sanchez,
and Ms. Emily Sturgell from Automated Synthesis Facility, The Scripps Research Institute, for
21
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 22 of 26
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
their assistance with HRMS analysis and compound purification. Helpful advice on NMR
spectroscopy from Dr. Laura Pasternack (TSRI), Dr. Dee-Hua Huang (TSRI), and Dr. Gerard J.
Kroon is acknowledged. P.V. thanks Mr. Hojoon Park (TSRI) for helpful discussions.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
REFERENCES
1.
(a) Taylor, R. D.; MacCoss, M.; Lawson, A. D. G. Rings in Drugs. J. Med. Chem. 2014,
57, 5845. (b) Vitaku, E.; Smith, D. T.; Njardarson, J. T. Analysis of the Structural Diversity,
Substitution Patterns, and Frequency of Nitrogen Heterocycles among U.S. FDA Approved
Pharmaceuticals. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 10257.
2.
(a) Lovering, F.; Bikker, J.; Humblet, C. Escape from Flatland: Increasing Saturation as an
Approach to Improving Clinical Success. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 6752. (b) Murray, C. W.; Rees,
D. C. Opportunity Knocks: Organic Chemistry for Fragment-Based Drug Discovery (FBDD).
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 488. (c) Blakemore, D. C.; Castro, L.; Churcher, I.; Rees, D. C.;
Thomas, A. W.; Wilson, D. M.; Wood, A. Organic Synthesis Provides Opportunities to Transform
Drug Discovery. Nat. Chem. 2018, 10, 383.
3.
(a) Campos, K. R. Direct sp3 C–H Bond Activation Adjacent to Nitrogen in Heterocycles.
Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 1069. (b) Mitchell, E. A.; Peschiulli, A.; Lefevre, N.; Meerpoel, L.;
Maes, B. U. W. Direct α-Functionalization of Saturated Cyclic Amines. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18,
10092.
4.
(a) Jovel, I.; Prateeptongkum, S.; Jackstell, R.; Vogl, N.; Weckbecker, C.; Beller, M. α-
Functionalization of Non-activated Aliphatic Amines: Ruthenium-catalyzed Alkynylations and
Alkylations. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 1956. (b) Dai, C.; Meschini, F.; Narayanam, J. M. R.;
Stephenson, C. R. J. Friedel–Crafts Amidoalkylation via Thermolysis and Oxidative
Photocatalysis. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 4425. (c) Girard, S. A.; Knauber, T.; Li, C.-J. The Cross-
Dehydrogenative Coupling of C–H Bonds: A Versatile Strategy for C–C Bond Formations.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 74. (d) Seidel, D. The Azomethine Ylide Route to Amine C–H
Functionalization: Redox-Versions of Classic Reactions and a Pathway to New Transformations.
Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 317. (e) Shang, M.; Chan, J. Z.; Cao, M.; Chang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Cook,
B.; Torker, S.; Wasa, M. C–H Functionalization of Amines via Alkene-Derived Nucleophiles
through Cooperative Action of Chiral and Achiral Lewis Acid Catalysts: Applications in
Enantioselective Synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 10593.
5.
(a) Meyers, A. I.; Edwards, P. D.; Rieker, W. F.; Bailey, T. R. Alpha-amino Carbanions
via Formamidines. Alkylation of Pyrrolidines, Piperidines, and Related Heterocycles. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 3270. (b) Beak, P.; Kerrick, S. T.; Wu, S.; Chu, J. Complex Induced
Proximity Effects: Enantioselective Syntheses Based on Asymmetric Deprotonations of N-Boc-
pyrrolidines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3231. (c) Campos, K. R.; Klapars, A.; Waldman, J. H.;
Dormer, P. G.; Chen, C.-Y. Enantioselective, Palladium-Catalyzed α-Arylation of N-Boc-
pyrrolidine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3538. (d) Beng, T. K.; Gawley, R. E. Highly
Enantioselective Catalytic Dynamic Resolution of N-Boc-2-lithiopiperidine: Synthesis of (R)-(+)-
N-Boc-Pipecolic Acid, (S)-(−)-Coniine, (S)-(+)-Pelletierine, (+)-β-Conhydrine, and (S)-(−)-
Ropivacaine and Formal Synthesis of (−)-Lasubine II and (+)-Cermizine C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
22
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 23 of 26
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2010, 132, 12216. (e) Hodgson, D. M.; Kloesges, J. Lithiation–Electrophilic Substitution of N-
Thiopivaloylazetidine. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 2900. (f) Seel, S.; Thaler, T.; Takatsu, K.;
Zhang, C.; Zipse, H.; Straub, B. F.; Mayer, P.; Knochel, P. Highly Diastereoselective Arylations
of Substituted Piperidines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 4774. (g) Cordier, C. J.; Lundgren, R. J.;
Fu, G. C. Enantioconvergent Cross-Couplings of Racemic Alkylmetal Reagents with Unactivated
Secondary Alkyl Electrophiles: Catalytic Asymmetric Negishi α-Alkylations of N-Boc-
pyrrolidine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10946. (h) Liniger, M.; Estermann, K.; Altmann, K.-H.
Total Synthesis of Hygrolines and Pseudohygrolines. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 11066. (i) Firth, J.
D.; O’Brien, P.; Ferris, L. Synthesis of Enantiopure Piperazines via Asymmetric Lithiation–
Trapping of N-Boc Piperazines: Unexpected Role of the Electrophile and Distal N-Substituent. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 651. (j) Lin, W.; Zhang, K.-F.; Baudoin, O. Regiodivergent
enantioselective C–H functionalization of Boc-1,3-oxazinanes for the synthesis of β2- and β3-
amino acids. Nat. Catal. 2019, 2, 882.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
6.
(a) Booth, S. E.; Benneche, T.; Undheim, K. Samarium Diiodide Mediated Alkylation of
Saturated Heterocycles Alpha to Nitrogen. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 3665. (b) Bertrand, S.; Glapski,
C.; Hoffmann, N.; Pete, J.-P. Highly Efficient Photochemical Addition of Tertiary Amines to
Electron Deficient Alkenes. Diastereoselective Addition to (5R)-5-menthyloxy-2[5H]-furanone.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3169. (c) Catino, A. J.; Nichols, J. M.; Nettles, B. J.; Doyle, M. P. The
Oxidative Mannich Reaction Catalyzed by Dirhodium Caprolactamate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 5648. (d) Yoshikai, N.; Mieczkowski, A.; Matsumoto, A.; Ilies, L.; Nakamura, E. Iron-
Catalyzed C−C Bond Formation at α-Position of Aliphatic Amines via C−H Bond Activation
through 1,5-Hydrogen Transfer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5568. (e) McNally, A.; Prier, C. K.;
MacMillan, D. W. C. Discovery of an α-Amino C–H Arylation Reaction Using the Strategy of
Accelerated Serendipity. Science 2011, 334, 1114. (f) Johnston, C. P.; Smith, R. T.; Allmendinger,
S.; MacMillan, D. W. C. Metallaphotoredox-catalysed sp3–sp3 Cross-coupling of Carboxylic
Acids with Alkyl Halides. Nature 2016, 536, 322. (g) Qin, T.; Cornella, J.; Li, C.; Malins, L. R.;
Edwards, J. T.; Kawamura, S.; Maxwell, B. D.; Eastgate, M. D.; Baran, P. S. A general Alkyl-
alkyl Cross-coupling Enabled by Redox-active Esters and Alkylzinc Reagents. Science 2016, 352,
801. (h) Xie, J.; Yu, J.; Rudolph, M.; Rominger, F.; Hashmi, A. S. K. Monofluoroalkenylation of
Dimethylamino Compounds through Radical–Radical Cross-Coupling. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2016, 55, 9416. (i) Thullen, S. M.; Rovis, T. A Mild Hydroaminoalkylation of Conjugated Dienes
Using a Unified Cobalt and Photoredox Catalytic System. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 15504. (j)
McManus, J. B.; Onuska, N. P. R.; Nicewicz, D. A. Generation and Alkylation of α-Carbamyl
Radicals via Organic Photoredox Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 9056.
7.
Davies, H. M. L.; Hansen, T.; Hopper, D. W.; Panaro, S. A. Highly Regio-, Diastereo-, and
Enantioselective C−H Insertions of Methyl Aryldiazoacetates into Cyclic N-Boc-Protected
Amines. Asymmetric Synthesis of Novel C2-Symmetric Amines and threo-Methylphenidate. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 6509.
8.
(a) Osberger, T. J.; Rogness, D. C.; Kohrt, J. T.; Stepan, A. F.; White, M. C. Oxidative
Diversification of Amino Acids and Peptides by Small-molecule Iron Catalysis. Nature 2016, 537,
214. (b) Chen, W.; Ma, L.; Paul, A.; Seidel, D. Direct α-C–H Bond Functionalization of
Unprotected Cyclic Amines. Nat. Chem. 2017, 10, 165. (c) Paul, A.; Seidel, D. α-Functionalization
of Cyclic Secondary Amines: Lewis Acid Promoted Addition of Organometallics to Transient
Imines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 8778.
23
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 24 of 26
1
2
3
4
9.
For arylation, see: (a) Pastine, S. J.; Gribkov, D. V.; Sames, D. sp3 C−H Bond Arylation
Directed by Amidine Protecting Group:ꢀ α-Arylation of Pyrrolidines and Piperidines. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 14220. (b) Prokopcová, H.; Bergman, S. D.; Aelvoet, K.; Smout, V.; Herrebout,
W.; Van der Veken, B.; Meerpoel, L.; Maes, B. U. W. C-2 Arylation of Piperidines through
Directed Transition-Metal-Catalyzed sp3 C–H Activation. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 13063. (c)
Dastbaravardeh, N.; Schnürch, M.; Mihovilovic, M. D. Ruthenium(0)-Catalyzed sp3 C–H Bond
Arylation of Benzylic Amines Using Arylboronates. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 1930. (d) Kumar, N. Y.
P.; Jeyachandran, R.; Ackermann, L. C(sp3)–H Bond Arylations Catalyzed by Well-Defined
[Ru(O2CMes)2(p-cymene)]. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 4145. (e) Greßies, S.; Klauck, F. J. R.; Kim,
J. H.; Daniliuc, C. G.; Glorius, F. Ligand-Enabled Enantioselective C–H Activation of
Tetrahydroquinolines and Saturated Aza-Heterocycles by RhI. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57,
9950. (f) Jiang, H.-J.; Zhong, X.-M.; Yu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wu, Y.-D.; Gong, L.-Z.
Assembling a Hybrid Pd Catalyst from a Chiral Anionic CoIII Complex and Ligand for
Asymmetric C(sp3)–H Functionalization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 1803.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
10.
For Ru-catalyzed alkylation, see: (a) Jun, C.-H. Chelation-assisted Alkylation of
Benzylamine Derivatives by Ru0 Catalyst. Chem. Commun. 1998, 1405. (b) Chatani, N.; Asaumi,
T.; Yorimitsu, S.; Ikeda, T.; Kakiuchi, F.; Murai, S. Ru3(CO)12-Catalyzed Coupling Reaction of
sp3 C−H Bonds Adjacent to a Nitrogen Atom in Alkylamines with Alkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 10935. (c) Bergman, S. D.; Storr, T. E.; Prokopcová, H.; Aelvoet, K.; Diels, G.;
Meerpoel, L.; Maes, B. U. W. The Role of the Alcohol and Carboxylic Acid in Directed
Ruthenium-Catalyzed C(sp3)–H α-Alkylation of Cyclic Amines. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 10393.
(d) Kulago, A. A.; Van Steijvoort, B. F.; Mitchell, E. A.; Meerpoel, L.; Maes, B. U. W. Directed
Ruthenium-Catalyzed C(sp3)–H α-Alkylation of Cyclic Amines Using Dioxolane-Protected
Alkenones. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014, 356, 1610. (e) Schinkel, M.; Wang, L.; Bielefeld, K.;
Ackermann, L. Ruthenium(II)-Catalyzed C(sp3)–H α-Alkylation of Pyrrolidines. Org. Lett. 2014,
16, 1876.
11.
For Ir-catalyzed alkylation, see: (a) Pan, S.; Endo, K.; Shibata, T. Ir(I)-Catalyzed
Enantioselective Secondary sp3 C–H Bond Activation of 2-(Alkylamino)pyridines with Alkenes.
Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 4692. (b) Lahm, G.; Opatz, T. Unique Regioselectivity in the C(sp3)–H α-
Alkylation of Amines: The Benzoxazole Moiety as a Removable Directing Group. Org. Lett. 2014,
16, 4201. (c) Tahara, Y.-K.; Michino, M.; Ito, M.; Kanyiva, K. S.; Shibata, T. Enantioselective sp3
C–H alkylation of γ-butyrolactam by a chiral Ir(I) catalyst for the synthesis of 4-substituted γ-
amino acids. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 16660. (d) Nagai, M.; Nagamoto, M.; Nishimura, T.;
Yorimitsu, H. Iridium-catalyzed sp3 C–H Alkylation of 3-Carbonyl-2-(alkylamino)pyridines with
Alkenes. Chem. Lett. 2017, 46, 1176. (e) Yamauchi, D.; Nishimura, T.; Yorimitsu, H.
Hydroxoiridium-Catalyzed Hydroalkylation of Terminal Alkenes with Ureas by C(sp3)−H Bond
Activation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 7200. (f) Hattori, H.; Nishimura, T. Iridium-Catalyzed
Sequential sp3 C−H Alkylation of an N-Methyl Group with Alkenes Towards the Synthesis of α-
Substituted Amines. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018, 360, 4827. (g) Nakamura, I.; Yamauchi, D.;
Nishimura, T. Hydroxoiridium-Catalyzed sp3 C−H Alkylation of Indoline Derivatives with
Terminal Alkenes. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2018, 7, 1347.
12.
For early transition metal catalyzed hydroaminoalkylation, see: (a) Herzon, S. B.; Hartwig,
J. F. Direct, Catalytic Hydroaminoalkylation of Unactivated Olefins with N-Alkyl Arylamines. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6690. (b) Eisenberger, P.; Ayinla, R. O.; Lauzon, J. M. P.; Schafer, L.
L. Tantalum–Amidate Complexes for the Hydroaminoalkylation of Secondary Amines: Enhanced
24
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 25 of 26
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Substrate Scope and Enantioselective Chiral Amine Synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48,
8361. (c) Kubiak, R.; Prochnow, I.; Doye, S. Titanium-Catalyzed Hydroaminoalkylation of
Alkenes by C–H Bond Activation at sp3 Centers in the α-Position to a Nitrogen Atom. Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 1153. (d) Nako, A. E.; Oyamada, J.; Nishiura, M.; Hou, Z. Scandium-
catalysed Intermolecular Hydroaminoalkylation of Olefins with Aliphatic Tertiary Amines. Chem.
Sci. 2016, 7, 6429. (e) Edwards, P. M.; Schafer, L. L. Early Transition Metal-catalyzed C–H
Alkylation: Hydroaminoalkylation for Csp3–Csp3 Bond Formation in the Synthesis of Selectively
Substituted Amines. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 12543.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
13.
For alkenylation, see: (a) Tsuchikama, K.; Kasagawa, M.; Endo, K.; Shibata, T. Cationic
Ir(I)-Catalyzed sp3 C−H Bond Alkenylation of Amides with Alkynes. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1821.
(b) Pan, S.; Matsuo, Y.; Endo, K.; Shibata, T. Cationic Iridium-catalyzed Enantioselective
Activation of Secondary sp3 C–H Bond Adjacent to Nitrogen Atom. Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 9009.
14.
For borylation, see: (a) Kawamorita, S.; Miyazaki, T.; Iwai, T.; Ohmiya, H.; Sawamura,
M. Rh-Catalyzed Borylation of N-Adjacent C(sp3)–H Bonds with a Silica-Supported
Triarylphosphine Ligand. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 12924. (b) Li, Q.; Liskey, C. W.; Hartwig,
J. F. Regioselective Borylation of the C–H Bonds in Alkylamines and Alkyl Ethers. Observation
and Origin of High Reactivity of Primary C–H Bonds Beta to Nitrogen and Oxygen. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2014, 136, 8755.
15.
For carbonylation, see: (a) Ishii, Y.; Chatani, N.; Kakiuchi, F.; Murai, S. Rhodium-
Catalyzed Reaction of N-(2-Pyridinyl)piperazines with CO and Ethylene. A Novel Carbonylation
at a C−H Bond in the Piperazine Ring. Organometallics 1997, 16, 3615. (b) Chatani, N.; Asaumi,
T.; Ikeda, T.; Yorimitsu, S.; Ishii, Y.; Kakiuchi, F.; Murai, S. Carbonylation at sp3 C−H Bonds
Adjacent to a Nitrogen Atom in Alkylamines Catalyzed by Rhodium Complexes. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 12882.
16.
For acetoxylation, see: Wang, D.-H.; Hao, X.-S.; Wu, D.-F.; Yu, J.-Q. Palladium-
Catalyzed Oxidation of Boc-Protected N-Methylamines with IOAc as the Oxidant:ꢀ A Boc-
Directed sp3 C−H Bond Activation. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3387.
17.
Early transition metal-catalyzed hydroaminoalkylation reactions (ref 11) are exceptions.
However, these reactions have limited compatibility with saturated azacycles and a low functional
group tolerance.
18.
Spangler, J. E.; Kobayashi, Y.; Verma, P.; Wang, D.-H.; Yu, J.-Q. α-Arylation of Saturated
Azacycles and N-Methylamines via Palladium(II)-Catalyzed C(sp3)–H Coupling. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2015, 137, 11876.
19.
For Pd(II)-catalyzed α-C(sp3)‒H methylation: Jain, P.; Verma, P.; Xia, G.; Yu, J.-Q.
Enantioselective Amine α-Functionalization via Palladium-catalysed C–H Arylation of
Thioamides. Nat. Chem. 2016, 9, 140.
20.
Pan, S.; Shibata, T. Recent Advances in Iridium-Catalyzed Alkylation of C–H and N–H
Bonds. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 704.
21. Tran, A. T.; Yu, J.-Q. Practical Alkoxythiocarbonyl Auxiliaries for Iridium(I)-Catalyzed
C−H Alkylation of Azacycles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 10530.
22.
Rare examples of transition-metal-catalyzed branch-selective C(sp2)‒H alkylation with
acrylates: (a) Wucher, P.; Caporaso, L.; Roesle, P.; Ragone, F.; Cavallo, L.; Mecking, S.; Göttker-
25
ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 26 of 26
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Schnetmann, I. Breaking the Regioselectivity Rule for Acrylate Insertion in the Mizoroki-Heck
Reaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 2011, 108, 8955. (b) Kommagalla, Y.; Srinivas, K.; Ramana,
C. V. Ru-Catalyzed Branched versus Linear Selective C3-Alkylation of 2-Aroylbenzofurans with
Acrylates via C‒H Activation. Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 7884. (c) Srinivas, K.; Dangat, Y.;
Kommagalla, Y.; Vanka, K.; Ramana, C. V. Electronic Control on Linear versus Branched
Alkylation of 2-/3-Aroylbenzofurans with Acrylates: Combined DFT and Synthetic Studies.
Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 7570.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
23.
(a) Grygorenko, O. O.; Radchenko, D. S.; Volochnyuk, D. M.; Tolmachev, A. A.;
Komarov, I. V. Bicyclic Conformationally Restricted Diamines. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 5506. (b)
Zheng, Y.; Tice, C. M.; Singh, S. B. The Use of Spirocyclic Scaffolds in Drug Discovery. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, 24, 3673.
24.
Borah, A. J.; Shi, Z. Rhodium-Catalyzed, Remote Terminal Hydroarylation of Activated
Olefins through a Long-Range Deconjugative Isomerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 6062.
25. Takebayashi, S.; Shibata, T. [Ir(cod)2]BARF-Catalyzed C−H Bond Alkenylation and
Alkylation of Ferroecenes. Organometallics 2012, 31, 4114.
26
ACS Paragon Plus Environment