Chemistry Letters 2001
1175
that the clay acts as a catalyst in the C–C bond fission. Clay
minerals are known to be an acidic catalyst,12 and often used for
catalytic thermal cracking of hydrocarbons.16,17 The detailed
mechanism of C–C bond fission on the clay is still not clear.
The present study demonstrated that transformation from
an ethylmethyl- into a dimethylpyrrole moiety in porphyrins
proceeds by the action of heat, and that the progress of the reac-
tion can be observed as a ratio of 1 to 2. Therefore, it was
expected that the ratio (1/(1 + 2)) can be used as a new maturity
indicator of sedimentary organic matter, since the maleimides
could have been oxidatively extracted from sediments. The
ratio of 1 to 2 in oxidation products of two different series of
natural sediments (Neogene and Cretaceous/Tertiary sediments)
has been found to be in agreement with the thermal maturity of
the sediments (Figure 4), which was evidenced by other maturi-
ty indicators.14,18 The ratio of 1 to 2 provides a new type of
maturity indicator, which can be obtained from insoluble stable
organic geopolymers in sediments.
References and Notes
1
J. L. Bada, R. Protsch, and R. A. Schroeder, Nature, 241, 394
(1973).
E. E. Bray and E. D. Evans, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 22, 2
(1961).
2
3
4
5
A. Treibs, Liebigs Ann. Chem., 510, 42 (1934).
W. W. Howe, Anal. Chem., 33, 255 (1961).
G. W. Hodgson, M. Strosher, and D. J. Casagrande, Adv. Org.
Geochem., 1971, 151.
6
7
8
9
E. T. Furlong and R. Carpenter, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 52,
87 (1988).
J. Martin, E. Quirke, G. J. Shaw, P. D. Soper, and J. R. Maxwell,
Tetrahedron, 36, 3261 (1980).
A. J. G. Barwise and E. V. Whitehead, Adv. Org. Geochem., 1980,
181.
S. Kauer, M. I. Chicarelli, and J. R. Maxwell, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
108, 1347 (1986).
2. This phenomenon can be chemically understood in terms of
the lower bond energy of the allylic C–C bond, compared to
those of the other bonds that exist in etioporphyrin.
The ratio of 1 to 2, expressed as 1/(1 + 2), obtained in heat-
ing of etioporphyrin without and with the clay is plotted against
the reaction time in Figures 2a and 2b, respectively. The
decreasing trends of the ratio with time were observed,
although the data were somewhat scattered. The clay mineral
accelerated the transformation as seen in Figure 2, and the
accelerating effect was obvious at the early stage of the reac-
tion. This result is in agreement with our previous studies indi-
cating the deactivation of Na-montmorillonite within 48h in
reactions above 250 °C.13,14 In order to evaluate kinetically the
role of the clay, we calculated activation energies in the pres-
ence and absence of the clay by using the Arrhenius plots,15
shown in Figure 3. The activation energy (81 kJ mol–1) was
lowered by the presence of the clay to 38 kJ mol–1, suggesting
10 K. Grice, R. Gibbison, J. E. Atkinson, L. Schwark, C. B. Eckardt,
and J. R. Maxwell, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 60, 3913 (1996).
11 K. Grice, P. Schaeffer, L. Schwark, and J. R. Maxwell, Org.
Geochem., 26, 677 (1997).
12 R. Alexander, R. I. Kagi, S. J. Rowland, P. N. Sheppard, and T. V.
Chirila, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 49, 385 (1985).
13 M. Hagiwara, S. Nomoto, and A. Shimoyama, Res. Org.
Geochem., 15, 43 (2000).
14 S. Nomoto, M. Hagiwara, Y. Nakano, and A. Shimoyama, Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn., 73, 1437 (2000).
15 The rate constants of the reactions with the clay were determined
by the first 3 to 5 data points within 12 h, assuming the first order
kinetics.
16 P. Ungerer, Org. Geochem., 16, 1 (1990).
17 J. W. Smith and B. D. Batts, Org. Geochem., 18, 737 (1992).
18 H. Mita and A. Shimoyama, Geochem. J., 33, 305 (1999).