Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 4 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
a)
b)
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Gramicidin A
5F8
γK+ = 23.2 ± 0.4 pS
γK+ = 26.4 ± 2.8 pS
Corresponding Author
6
7
8
9
Notes
5 pA
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
5 s
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Figure 5. Single channel current traces of (a) the dimeric gramicidin A
recorded at 200 mv and (b) 5F8 recorded at -200 mv, respectively, in
symmetrical solutions (cis chamber = trans chamber = 1 M KCl).
This work was supported by the Institute of Bioengineering
and Nanotechnology (Biomedical Research Council, Agency for
Science, Technology and Research, Singapore) and the Singapore
National Research Foundation under its Environment and Water
Research Programme and administered by PUB.
(Figures 4c and S13a-b). Compared to changes of 164% by
Valinomycin at 0.2 M (Figures 4c and S13c), < 10% by
gramicidin A (Figure S13d) and < 20% by other synthetic highly
selective K+ channels,3c such large degrees of membrane
polarization caused by 5F8 and 5F10 are very remarkable,
establishing highly selective transport of K+ ions.
Taken together, the above data demonstrate that 5F8 and 5F10
markedly outperform all other 13 channels studied herein, and
5F8 is the most selective in K+ transport among all. The ability of
5F8 to function as an ion channel rather than a carrier in
mediating ions across the membrane was then unambiguously
confirmed by the observation of single channel current traces
recorded in both symmetrical (cis chamber = trans chamber = 1
M KCl) and asymmetric (cis chamber = 1M KCl and trans
chamber = 1 M NaCl) baths (Figures 5b and S14d). On the basis
of I-V curves obtained (Figure S14a and c), potassium conduction
rate (γK+) and K+/Na+ selectivity were determined to be 26.4 ± 2.8
pS and 9.8, respectively, demonstrating that 5F8-mediated
transport of K+ ions occurs in a fast and highly selective fashion.
REFERENCES
(1) Doyle, D. A.; Morais Cabral, J.; Pfuetzner, R. A.; Kuo, A.; Gulbis, J.
M.; Cohen, S. L.; Chait, B. T.; MacKinnon, R. Science 1998, 280,
69.
(2) (a) Vargas Jentzsch, A.; Hennig, A.; Mareda, J.; Matile, S. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 2791; (b) Sakai, N.; Matile, S. Langmuir 2013,
29, 9031; (c) Montenegro, J.; Ghadiri, M. R.; Granja, J. R. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 2955; (d) Fyles, T. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013,
46, 2847; (e) Otis, F.; Auger, M.; Voyer, N. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013,
46, 2934; (f) Gokel, G. W.; Negin, S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46,
2824; (g) Gokel, G. W.; Mukhopadhyay, A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2001,
30, 274; (h) Davis, A. P.; Sheppard, D. N.; Smith, B. D. Chem. Soc.
Rev. 2007, 36, 348; (i) Davis, J. T.; Okunola, O.; Quesada, R. Chem.
Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 3843; (j) Zhao, Y.; Cho, H.; Widanapathirana,
L.; Zhang, S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 2763; (k) Gong, B.; Shao, Z.
Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 2856; (l) Si, W.; Xin, P.; Li, Z.-T.; Hou,
J.-L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 1612; (m) Huo, Y. P.; Zeng, H. Q.
Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 922.
(3) (a) Wright, A. J.; Matthews, S. E.; Fischer, W. B.; Beer, P. D. Chem.
Eur. J. 2001, 7, 3474; (b) Sun, Z.; Barboiu, M.; Legrand, Y.-M.;
Petit, E.; Rotaru, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 127, 14681; (c)
Gilles, A.; Barboiu, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 426; (d) Otis,
F.; Racine-Berthiaume, C.; Voyer, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133,
6481; (e) D. Hall, C.; J. Kirkovits, G.; C. Hall, A. Chem. Comm.
1999, 1897; (f) Sakai, N.; Gerard, D.; Matile, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 2517.
(4) (a) Ren, C. L.; Ng, G. H. B.; Wu, H.; Chan, K.-H.; Shen, J.; Teh, C.;
Ying, J. Y.; Zeng, H. Q. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 4001; (b) Ren, C.
L.; Chen, F.; Zhou, F.; Shen, J.; Su, H. B.; Zeng, H. Q. Langmuir
2016, 32, 13510; (c) Ren, C. L.; Shen, J.; Chen, F.; Zeng, H. Q.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 3847. (d) Zhao, H. Q.; Sheng, S.;
Hong, Y. H.; Zeng, H. Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 14270.
(5) (a) Bartsch, R. A.; Jeon, E.-G.; Walkowiak, W.; Apostoluk, W. J.
Memb. Sci. 1999, 159, 123; (b) Talanova, G. G.; Elkarim, N. S. A.;
Hanes, R. E.; Hwang, H.-S.; Rogers, R. D.; Bartsch, R. A. Anal.
In conclusion, we have established here
a privileged
monopeptide-based scaffold toward creation of K+-selective ion
channels via directional assembly of crown ethers. Characterized
by high tunability in structure and reliability in channel formation,
our channel system represents an unusual example among the
hitherto artificially developed ion channel systems. Accordingly,
the most advantageous feature of our approach is its intrinsic
modularity in appended side chains, which is mostly independent
of and thus exerts a tolerable degree of influences on the main
chain’s H-bonding functionality and self-assembling propensity,
thereby enabling consistent formation of crown ether-containing
H-bonded 1D structures. Such easily accessible tunability
subsequently allows a combinatorial optimization of channels’ ion
transport efficiency and selectivity, quickly giving rise to two fast-
conducting K+-selective channels (e.g., 5F8 and 5F10) that are
comparable to the best K+-selective channels described in
literature over the years.2,3
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
+
Chem. 1999, 71, 672; (c) Although the values of RM and ratio R
(e.g., RK+/RNa+) could be used to quickly and reliably gauge the
relative ion selectivity across different classes of channel molecules,
ratio R could only serve as a good approximation of true ion
selectivity intrinsic to any channel molecule (See Table S3 and
Figure S15 for a detailed discussion involving EC50 values). Instead,
the best approach to determine the ion selectivity is via the use of
single channel current measurement.
Supporting Information. Synthetic procedures and a full set
of characterization data including 1H NMR, 13C NMR and MS for
all channel molecules as well as ion transport study, single
channel current recording, molecular modeling, SEM/TEM
images, 1H NMR dilution experiments and ICP data. This
material is available free of charge via the Internet at
ACS Paragon Plus Environment