In searching for alternative structures that may be capable
of acting as sources of sulfur monoxide, we were drawn to
the unusual reactivity observed in a number of 1,8 (peri)-
substituted naphthalene ring systems.11 In particular, tran-
sannular interactions between two sulfur atoms in cyclic 1,8-
dithiasubstituted naphthalene derivatives have been extensively
studied by Glass12 and Furukawa,13 and in the latter case
this has led to a number of unusual photochemically mediated
extrusion reactions. We chose the peri-fused trisulfide-2-
oxide 11 as our synthetic target.14
provided disulfide 9 in 31% overall yield. Although the yield
is only moderate, this reaction allows the rapid preparation
of gram quantities of disulfide 9. The trisulfide oxide 11 is
a yellow solid that can be stored refrigerated for months
without decomposition.
The X-ray crystal structure of 11 highlights a number of
interesting structural features (Figure 2). A nonplanar
The synthesis of trisulfide-2-oxide 11 is shown in Scheme
1. The known disulfide 9 appeared to be an ideal precursor
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Trisulfide-2-oxide 11
Figure 2. X-ray crystal structure of trisulfide-2-oxide 11.
conformation is adopted by the trithiane ring, whereby the
central sulfur atom S(2) lies out of the mean least-squares
plane of the naphthalene ring and peri-sulfur atoms by
1.1708(14) Å (torsion angles C1-S1-S2-S3, 60.1° and
C8-S3-S2-S1, 64.6°, respectively). The oxygen atom
occupies a pseudoaxial position on the trithiane ring,
probably as a result of stabilization of this conformer through
stereoelectronic effects.20,21
Two factors point to the strain in the system. First, the
enlargement of the expected bond angles at C(1), C(9), and
C(8) (125.7°, 126.6°, and 124.7°) is consistent with the
minimization of steric interactions associated with the close
proximity of substituents at the 1,8-positions of the naph-
thalene ring system.11 Second, whereas S(1) is essentially
coplanar with the naphthalene ring, S(3) lies 0.203(4) Å out
of the mean least-squares plane, on the opposite side to S(2).
The thermal stability of 11 in the absence of dienes was
first investigated. Upon refluxing overnight in chlorobenzene,
clean conversion to disulfide 9 was observed, along with
the formation of elemental sulfur.22 Encouraged by this result,
we investigated the potential of 11 to act as a source of sulfur
monoxide in trapping experiments with dienes and were
delighted to find that refluxing a solution of 11 in chloro-
to 11, despite the somewhat laborious methods previously
employed in its synthesis.15 Indeed, reduction of disulfide 9
with lithium aluminum hydride followed by reaction of the
air-sensitive dithiol (10)16 with thionyl chloride in the
presence of pyridine provided 11 in 65% overall yield after
column chromatography.17 With our subsequent discovery
that 11 does indeed act as a source of sulfur monoxide (vide
infra), we developed a convenient “one-pot” synthesis
disulfide 9 starting from commercially available 1-bromo-
naphthalene 7. Hence, lithium-halogen exchange on 7
followed by directed deprotonation18 and trapping of the
resulting 1,8-dilithionaphthalene (8) with elemental sulfur19
(7) Heyke, O.; Neher, A.; Lorenz, I.-P. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1992, 23,
608.
(8) For displacement of sulfur monoxide from an iridium complex and
trapping with an orthoquinone, see: Schenk, W. A.; Leissner, J. Z.
Naturforsch., B: Chem. Sci. 1987, 42, 799.
(9) Blake, A. J.; Cooke, P. A.; Kendall, J. D.; Simpkins, N. S.; Westaway,
S. M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 153.
(10) Huang, R.; Espenson, J. H. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 6374.
(11) Balasubramaniyan, V. Chem. ReV. 1966, 66, 567.
(12) Glass, R. S.; Broeker, J. L.; Firouzabadi, H. J. Org. Chem. 1990,
55, 5739.
(19) Meinwald, J.; Dauplaise, D.; Wudl, F.; Hauser, J. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1977, 99, 255.
(20) Juaristi, E.; Ordon˜ez, M. In Organosulfur Chemistry, Synthetic and
Stereochemical Aspects; Page, P., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA,
1998; Vol. 2, Chapter 3, pp 63-95.
(21) Pseudoaxial oxygen is also observed in other cyclic trisulfide oxide
derivatives for which the X-ray crystal structures are known (all five-
membered rings): (a) Ghosh, T.; Bartlett, P. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988,
110, 7499. (b) Watson, W. H.; Krawiec, M.; Ghosh, T.; Bartlett, P. D. Acta
Crystallogr. 1992, C48, 2092. (c) Kimura, T.; Hanzawa, M.; Horn, E.;
Kawii, Y.; Ogawa, S.; Sato, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 1607.
(22) Presumed to have formed via disproportionation of sulfur monoxide
to SO2 and S2O, which in turn disproportionates to SO2 and S3, a source of
S8.
(13) For a review see: Furukawa, N. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1997, 70,
2571.
(14) For a review of trisulfides and their oxides, see: Clennan, E. L.;
Stensaas, K. L. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 1998, 30, 553
(15) (a) Zweig, A.; Hoffmann, A. K. J. Org. Chem. 1965, 30, 3997. (b)
Gamage, S. A.; Smith, R. A. J. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 2111.
(16) Yui, K.; Aso, Y.; Otsubo, T.; Ogura, F. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1988,
61, 953.
(17) All compounds synthesized exhibited satisfactory spectral data (IR,
1H and 13C NMR, and MS).
(18) (a) Neugebauer, W.; Clark, T.; Schleyer, P. v. R. Chem. Ber. 1983,
116, 3283. (b) Brandsma, L. PreparatiVe Polar Organometallic Chemistry;
Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1987; Vol. 1, pp 195-196.
3566
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 22, 2001