Chemistry Letters 2001
263
ty in all solvents tested. The best result was recorded when
[bmim]BF4 was employed as the solvent (Entry 7) and the
showed that recycling of the enzyme was indeed possible in our
ionic liquid solvent system, though the reaction rate gradually
dropped by repeating the reaction process (Entries 3–5). This is
the first demonstration that the recycle use of enzyme was in
fact possible in the ionic liquid solvent system.
In conclusion, we demonstrated the lipase-catalyzed enan-
tioselective transesterification of an allylic alcohol in the ionic
liquid solvent system and demonstrate that it is possible to
repeatedly use the enzyme in the ionic liquid solvent system.
Further investigation of the scope and limitations of this reac-
tion, especially optimization of the reaction conditions for the
lipase recycling system in the ionic solvent system, will make it
even more beneficial.
11a
reaction rate was nearly equal to that of the reference reaction
in i-Pr2O (Entry 10). On the contrary, a significant drop in the
reaction rate was obtained when the reaction was carried out in
[bmim]TFA11b (Entry 6), [bmim]OTf11c (Entry 8) or
11d
[bmim]SbF6 (Entry 9). From these obtained results, it was
concluded that [bmim]PF6 and [bmim]BF4 are suitable solvents
for the present lipase-catalyzed reaction. Although the acylation
rate in the reaction of [bmim]PF6 was a slightly inferior to that
in [bmim]BF4, we chose [bmim]PF6 as the best solvent for the
present enzymatic reaction system. Because a very easy work-
up process was realized in the reaction of [bmim]PF6 due to the
insolubility of this salt in both water and ether. [bmim]BF4 was
quite soluble in water and, therefore, it was difficult to remove
the by-product such as acetic acid by simple work-up processes.
The authors are grateful to Professor Tomoya Kitazume at
the Tokyo Institute of Technology for the helpful discussions
throughout this work. The authors also thank Meito Sangyo
Co., Ltd. and Amano Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. for providing the
lipases. They are grateful to the SC-NMR Laboratory of
Okayama University for the NMR measurements.
References and Notes
1
A recent review, see : T. Welton, Chem. Rev., 99, 2071
(1999).
2
A review, see : C. H. Wong and G. M. Whitesides,
“Enzymes in Synthetic Organic Chemistry,” Tetrahedron
Organic Chemistry Series Vol. 12, ed. by J. E. Baldwin and
P. D. Magnus, Pergamon (1994).
3
4
5
6
S. G. Cull, J. D. Holbrev, V. Vargas-More, K. R. Seddon,
and G. J. Lye, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 69, 227 (2000).
M. Erbeldinger, A. J. Mesiano, and A. J. Russell,
Biotechnol. Prog., 16, 1131 (2000).
R. M. Lau, F. v. Rantwijk, K. R. Seddon, and R. A.
Sheldon, Org. Lett., 2, 4189 (2000).
The first example of lipase-catalyzed asymmetric transes-
terification in an ionic liquid solvent was reported by T.
Kitazume, though the results have not yet published for-
mally; 16th International Symposium on Fluorine
Chemistry, Durham, UK, July 16–21, 2000, B-36.
The results were reported at the International Chemical
Congress of Pacific Basin Societies (Pacifichem 2000) on
December 18, 2000. Symposium on “Biocatalyst in
Organic Synthesis” 1649 and 1653.
7
Since it was anticipated that lipase might be anchored by
the ionic liquid solvent and remained in it after the extraction
work-up of the products, we next attempted to repeatedly use
the lipase in the [bmim]PF6 solvent system (Scheme 1). The
results are shown in Table 2. A mixture of the substrate, lipase,
and vinyl acetate in the [bmim]PF6 solvent was stirred for 3 h,
and then ether was added to the reaction mixture to form the
biphasic state. The desired products and unreacted alcohol were
quantitatively extracted from the ether (upper layer). To the
remained ionic liquid phase, which was placed under reduced
pressure for 15 min to remove the ether, a mixture of the sub-
strate and vinyl acetate was again added. This mixture was
stirred at rt. As expected, the acylation reaction smoothly took
place and the product was obtained without any loss in enan-
tioselectivity (Entry 2). It was thus confirmed that the enzyme
was in fact anchored in the ionic liquid solvent after the work-
up process. Repeating the same process, we successfully
8
9
J. G. Huddleston, H. D. Willauer, R. P. Swatloski, A. E.
Visser, and R. D. Rogers, Chem. Commun., 1998, 1765.
a) Y. Takagi, R. Ino, H. Kihara, T. Itoh, and H. Tsukube,
Chem. Lett., 1997, 1247. b) Y. Takagi, T. Nakatani, T.
Itoh, and T. Oshiki, Tetrahedron Lett., 41, 7889 (2000).
10 C. -S. Chen, Y. Fujimoto, G. Girdauskas, and C. J. Sih, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 102, 7294 (1982).
11 a) [bmim]BF4: P. A. Z. Suarez, J. E. L. Dullius, S. Einloft,
R. F. de Souza, and J. Dupont, Polyhedron, 15, 1217
(1996). b) [bmim]TFA: The synthesis of this salt was
similar to that of [bmim]PF6 with the exception that
CF3COONa was used in place of NaPF6. c) [bmim]OTf:
P. Bonhote, A.-P. Dias, N. Papageorgiou, K.
Kalyanasundaram, and M. Grätzel, Inorg. Chem., 35, 1168
(1996). d) [bmim]SbF6: C. E. Song, C. R. Oh, E. J. Roh,
and D. J. Choo, Chem. Commun., 2000, 1743.