Mendeleev Commun., 2015, 25, 344–345
C9H2 moiety and a silyl group at C4 driving the process to syn-
isomer. The further methylation of the obtained cycloadducts 4‡
and 5§ afforded the desired monomer7 6 bearing three SiMe3
groups.
Table 1 DFT calculations of activation energies for the reactions of
different alkenes with Q.
Activation energy/
Activation energy/
kcal mol–1
Alkene
Alkene
kcal mol–1
The reaction of Q with tetrakis(trichlorosilyl)ethene 3 was
anticipated to give a tetrasubstituted cycloadduct. Compound 3¶
was cleanly synthesized according to Scheme 2.8 Note that direct
synthesis9 of this compound is accompanied by formation of
hardly separable by-products which could also react with Q.
Taking into consideration the fact that reactivity of alkenes
gradually increased from vinyltrichlorosilane to 1,1-bis(trichloro-
silyl)ethene and then to 1,1,2-tris(trichlorosilyl)ethene,7,10 we
suggested that olefin 3 would be sufficiently active in the reaction
with Q. Unexpectedly, no reaction between 3 and Q was observed
at both room and elevated temperatures (Scheme 3).
SiCl3
H2C CH2
29.8
15.8
Cl3Si
Cl3Si
SiCl3
SiCl3
22.3
16.8
33.4
34.3
SiCl3
SiCl3
SiCl3
Cl3Si
Cl3Si
SiCl3
SiCl3
Cl3Si
SiMe3
increased by more than twice (from 15.8 up to 33.4 kcal mol–1).
This barrier is even higher than that for unsubstituted ethylene
(29.8 kcal mol–1). A possible reason of this fact lies in a high
steric hindrance of four SiCl3 substituents. Indeed, according to
X-ray data, C and Si atoms of alkene 3 are not in the same
plane. The double bond showed the twist with dihedral angles
Si1–C=C–Si3 of 28.0° and Si2–C=C–Si4 of 28.2°.8 Non-planar
structure of 1 resulted in the creation of a critical hindrance for
the desired reaction. Replacement of one SiCl3 group by SiMe3
group makes double bond more polar. However, in this case a
growth of activation barrier was observed (see Table 1). This can
be attributed to electron-donating properties of SiMe3 group, and
this fact evidenced that steric hindrance is the principal factor.
In summary, it was shown that partially methylated chloro-
silylalkanes bearing three Si-containing substituents at the double
bond and up to five Me groups at Si atoms can successfully
give [2s+ 2s+ 2p]-cycloadducts with Q, while the alkene with
four strong electron-withdrawing SiCl3 groups turned out to be
inactive at all due to greater steric hindrance.
SiCl3
Cl3Si
Cl3Si
SiCl3
SiCl3
SiCl3
SiCl3
+
25–95 °C
SiCl3
Q
3
Scheme 3
The origin of such inactivity can in principle arise from a
steric hindrance of substituents and low polarization of the double
bond. The possibility of such reaction was evaluated applying
density functional theory (DFT)†† (Table 1). According to cal-
culations, the lowest activation barrier was attributed to tris-
(trichlorosilyl)ethene which showed the highest activity in the
studied reaction.7 The rise in number of SiCl3 groups up to
four dramatically influenced the activation barrier: it suddenly
‡
3-Dimethylchlorosilyl-3,4-bis(methyldichlorosilyl)tricyclo[4.2.1.02,5]-
1
non-7-ene 4: yield 85%, mp 152–155°C. H NMR (499.8 MHz, C6D6)
d: 5.80–5.71 (m, 2H, C7H, C8H), 3.19 (br.s, 1H, C1H/C6H), 2.72 (br.s,
1H, C1H/C6H), 2.56 (d, 1H, C2H, 3J 10.1 Hz), 2.47–2.41 (m, 1H, C5H),
2.28–2.21 (m, 2H, C9H, C4H), 1.31 (d, 1H, C9H, 2J 9.6 Hz), 0.84 (br.s,
3H, MeSiCl2), 0.77 (br.s, 3H, MeSiCl2), 0.55 (br.s, 3H, Me2SiCl), 0.52
(br.s, 3H, Me2SiCl). 13C NMR (125.7 MHz, C6D6) d: 136.53, 134.95 (C7,
C8), 45.43 (C1, C6), 43.73 (C4), 42.26 (C9), 39.23 (C5), 35.20 (C2), 28.37
(C3), 7.79 (MeSiCl2), 6.58 (MeSiCl2), 6.29 (Me2SiCl), 5.84 (Me2SiCl).
References
1 V. A. Petrov and N. V. Vasil’ev, Curr. Org. Synth., 2006, 3, 215.
2 (a) R. H. Grubbs, in Handbook of Metathesis, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
2008, p.1; (b) E. S. Finkelshtein, M. V. Bermeshev, M. L. Gringolts,
L. E. Starannikova and Yu. P. Yampolskii, Russ. Chem. Rev., 2011, 80,
341 (Usp. Khim., 2011, 80, 362).
3 I. Tabushi, K. Yamamura and Z. Youshida, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1972,
94, 787.
4 A. E. Feiring, M. K. Crawford, W. B. Farnham, J. Feldman, R. H. French,
C. P. Junk, K. W. Leffew, V. A. Petrov, W. Qiu, F. L. Schadt, H. V. Tran
and F. C. Zumsteg, Macromolecules, 2006, 39, 3252.
§
3,4-Bis(dimethylchlorosilyl)-3-methyldichlorosilyltricyclo[4.2.1.02,5]-
non-7-ene 5: yield 55%. 1H NMR (499.8 MHz, C6D6) d: 5.80–5.71 (m,
2H, C7H, C8H), 3.20 (br.s, 1H, C1H/C6H), 2.72 (br.s, 1H, C1H/C6H),
2.35 (d, 1H, C9H2, 2J 10.1 Hz), 2.32–2.29 (m, 2H), 2.11 (d, 1H, 3J 5.2 Hz),
2
1.35 (d, 1H, C9H, J 10.1 Hz), 0.77 (m, 3H, MeSiCl2), 0.58 (br.s, 3H,
5 (a) M. Bermeshev, B. Bulgakov, L. Starannikova, G. Dibrov, P. Chapala,
D. Demchuk,Y.Yampolskii and E. Finkelshtein, J. Appl. Pol. Sci., 2015,
132, 41395; (b) M.V. Bermeshev,A.V. Syromolotov, L. E. Starannikova,
M. L. Gringolts, V. G. Lakhtin, Y. P. Yampolskii and E. S. Finkelshtein,
Macromolecules, 2013, 46, 8973.
6 V. D. Scheludyakov, V. I. Zhun’, V. G. Lakhtin, V. V. Scherbinin and
E. A. Chernyshev, Zh. Obshch. Khim., 1982, 53, 1192 (in Russian).
7 M. Bermeshev, P. Chapala, V. Lakhtin, A. Genaev, M. Filatova, A. Peregudov,
K. Utegenov, N. Ustynyuk and E. Finkelshtein, Silicon, 2015, 7, 117.
8 C. Rüdinger, H. Beruda and H. Schmidbaur, Z. Naturforsch., 1994, 49b,
1348.
9 A. D. Petrov, S. I. Sadykh-Zade, E. A. Chernyshev and V. F. Mironov,
Zh. Obshch. Khim., 1956, 26, 1248 (in Russian).
10 M. V. Bermeshev, A. V. Syromolotov, M. L. Gringolts, V. G. Lakhtin and
E. S. Finkelshtein, Tetrahedron Lett., 2011, 52, 6091.
11 D. N. Laikov, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1997, 281, 151.
Me2SiCl), 0.54 (br.s, 3H, Me2SiCl), 0.46 (br.s, 3H, Me2SiCl), 0.42 (br.s,
3H, Me2SiCl). 13C NMR (125.7 MHz, C6D6) d: 136.55, 134.92 (C7, C8),
45.65, 45.37, 43.03, 42.35 (C9), 39.24, 33.35, 27.84 (C3), 10.11 (MeSiCl2),
4.34 (Me2SiCl), 3.98 (Me2SiCl), 2.85 (Me2SiCl), 2.76 (Me2SiCl).
¶
1
Bis(trichlorosilyl)methane. H NMR (499.8 MHz, CDCl3) d: 1.37 (s,
2H). 13C NMR (125.7 MHz, CDCl3) d: 22.07. 29Si NMR (99.3 MHz,
CDCl3) d: 1.9.
Dichlorobis(trichlorosilyl)methane. 13C NMR (125.7 MHz, CDCl3) d:
63.98. 29Si NMR (99.3 MHz, CDCl3) d: –9.2.
Tetrakis(trichlorosilyl)ethene 3. Copper powder (50 mm) (3.5 g, 55 mmol)
and dichlorobis(trichlorosilyl)methane (7.5 g, 21 mmol) were placed in a
two-necked flask equipped with magnetic stirrer and reflux condenser.
The mixture was heated at 220°C for 6 h. The crude mixture was extracted
with warm hexane (3×15 ml). The solvent was removed under reduced
pressure (2 Torr) and the crude product was sublimed (0.1 Torr, 70°C).
Then it was recrystallized twice from hexane and obtained as a moisture
sensitive white solid; mp 150–153°C. Yield: 3.6 g (60%). 13C NMR
(125.7 MHz, CDCl3) d: 178.10. 29Si NMR (99.3 MHz, CDCl3) d: –12.2.
†† The Cluster of the Novosibirsk University Scientific Computing Center
quant/222/. DFT calculations were performed with the PRIRODA pro-
gram,11 functional PBE,12 basis L113 (L01, cc-pVDZ analog).
12 J. P. Perdew, K. Burke and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1996, 77,
3865.
13 D. N. Laikov, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2005, 416, 116.
Received: 17th April 2015; Com. 15/4605
– 345 –