Y. Wu, Y. Zhang, X. Chen et al.
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 213 (2021) 113163
Fig. 7. Antitumor efficacy of compound 1 and compound 6b in the xenograft model. (A) The efficacy of compound 1 and compound 6b in the CT26 xenograft model at the dose of
100 mg/kg. (B) The change of body weight for mice that were treated with compound 1 and compound 6b. Data are presented as the mean SEM; n ¼ 5 BalB/C mice per group:
(***) P < 0.001 versus control group, determined with Student’s t-test.
99.70, 42.69, 42.38; HRMS (ESI, positive) m/z calcd for
C
4.1.5. (Z)-N-(2-((4-(N-(3-Bromo-4-fluorophenyl)-N0-
17H12BrFN9O5 (M ꢁ H)- 520.0134, found 522.0152.
hydroxycarbamim-idoyl)-1,2,5-oxa-diazol-3-yl)amino)ethyl)-2-((7-
nitrobenzo[c] [1,2,5]oxa-diazol-4-yl)amino)aceta-mide (6b)
The synthetic procedure of 6b was similar to that of 6b. Orange
solid, yield 14%. Purity >95%. 1H NMR (DMSO‑d6, 600 MHz)
d: 11.45
4.1.2. (7-Nitrobenzo[c] [1,2,5]oxadiazol-4-yl)glycine (5a)
Compound 3 (517 mg, 2.61 mmol), glycine (196 mg, 2.61 mmol)
and NaHCO3 (263 mg, 3.13 mmol) were dissolved in MeOH (10 mL)
and H2O (5 mL), and the mixture was heated to 60 ꢀC. The solvent
was removed under reduced pressure and the crude product was
purified by column chromatography on silica gel (dichloro-
methane: methanol ¼ 100: 8) to obtain the intermediate 5a
(s, 1 H), 9.43 (s, 1 H), 8.89 (s, 1H), 8.49 (d, J ¼ 9.80 Hz, 1H), 8.17 (s,
1 H), 7.17 (t, J ¼ 8.17 Hz 1H), 7.06e7.14 (m, 1H), 6.67e6.83 (m, 1H),
6.39 (d, J ¼ 7.80 Hz,1H), 6.20 (s,1H), 3.67 (s, 2H), 3.38 (s, 4H), 2.56 (t,
J ¼ 5.91 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (DMSO‑d6, 150 MHz)
d: 170.59, 156.15,
154.95, 153.37, 144.81, 140.37, 139.72, 138.42, 138.24, 125.25, 121.91,
121.35, 116.33, 116.28, 107.54, 107.40, 99.67, 44.09, 37.81, 34.18;
HRMS (ESI, positive) m/z calcd for C20H19BrFN10O6 (M þ H)þ
593.0651, found 593.0657.
(292 mg, 47%) as an orange solid. 1H NMR (DMSO‑d6, 600 MHz)
d:
12.39 (s, 1 H), 9.44 (s, 1 H), 8.51 (d, J ¼ 8.06 Hz, 1H), 6.44 (d,
J ¼ 8.06 Hz, 1H), 3.67 (s, 2H), 2.72 (s, 2H).
4.2. Biological activity
4.1.3. 3-((7-Nitrobenzo[c] [1,2,5]oxadiazol-4-yl)amino)propanoic
acid (5b)
4.2.1. IDO1 enzymatic assay
The assays were performed according to the literature [35]. The
reaction mixture contained the test compounds at different con-
The synthetic procedure of 5b was similar to that of 5a. Orange
solid, yield 58%. 1H NMR (DMSO‑d6, 600 MHz)
d: 13.09 (s, 1 H), 9.40
centrations, 20 nM IDO1, 2 mM Trp, 3.5 mM methylene blue, 20 mM
(s, 1 H), 8.53 (d, J ¼ 8.90 Hz, 1H), 6.37 (d, J ¼ 8.90 Hz, 1H), 4.28 (s,
ascorbate, and 0.2 mg/mL catalase in 50 mM potassium phosphate
buffer (pH 6.5). The absorbance (OD) at 321 nm was read on the
WellscanMK-2 microplate reader (Labsystems). The concentration
triggering 50% inhibition (IC50) values were calculated using Prism
GraphPad software based on nonlinear regression with normalized
doseꢁresponse fit.
2H).
4.1.4. (Z)-N-(2-((4-(N-(3-Bromo-4-fluorophenyl)-N0-
hydroxycarbamim-idoyl)-1,2,5-oxa-diazol-3-yl)amino)ethyl)-2-((7-
nitrobenzo[c] [1,2,5]oxa-diazol-4-yl)amino)aceta-mide (6a)
The intermediate 5a (238 mg, 1 mmol), compound 2a (383 mg,
4.2.2. In vitro cytotoxicity assay
1 mmol), HATU (570 mg, 1.5 mmol) and DIPEA (265 mL, 1.5 mmol)
Human cervical cancer cell line HeLa or murine colon carcinoma
cell line CT26 in the logarithmic phase were harvested and seeded
at a density of 6 ꢂ 103/well in 96-well plates. After incubation for
24 h with 5% CO2 at 37 ꢀC, the cells were treated with test com-
pounds at different concentrations in three replicates for 72 h. Then
were dissolved in DMF (6 mL) and the mixture was stirred at room
temperature for 1 h. Then the solution was poured into saturated
NaCl aqueous solution (80 mL) and extracted with ethyl acetate
(3 ꢂ 15 mL). The organic phase was collected and concentrated
under reduced pressure to obtain the crude product, which was
subsequently dissolved in MeOH (10 mL) and H2O (5 mL) along
with KOH (78 mg, 2 mmol). The mixture was stirred at room
temperature for 0.5 h, and then the solvent was removed under
reduced pressure and the crude product was purified by column
chromatography on silica gel (dichloromethane: methanol ¼ 100:
1) to obtain the intermediate 6a (81 mg, 21%) as an orange solid.
they were replaced by100 mL of culture media containing 10% CCK8
kit and the plates were incubated for another 40 min. Then OD
values at 480 nm were read on the WellscanMK-2 microplate
reader (Labsystems). The concentration triggering 50% inhibition
(IC50) values were calculated using Prism GraphPad software based
on nonlinear regression with normalized doseꢁresponse fit.
Purity >95%. 1H NMR (DMSO‑d6, 600 MHz)
d: 9.43 (s, 1 H), 8.50 (t,
J ¼ 8.73 Hz, 1H), 8.32 (s, 1H), 8.08 (s, 1H), 7.72 (s, 1H), 7.49e7.66 (m,
4.2.3. Cell based IDO1 assay
1H), 6.55 (s, 1H), 6.24 (s, 1H), 5.56e5.88 (m, 1H), 4.12 (s, 2H), 3.53-
Cell based IDO1 assay was carried out according to the literature
[17,26]. HeLa cells originating from human cervical cancer in the
logarithmic phase were harvested and seeded at a density of
6 ꢂ 103/well in 96-well plates. After incubation for 24 h with 5% CO2
3.40 (m, 2H), 3.32 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (DMSO‑d6, 150 MHz)
d:170.59,
156.13, 154.22, 144.82, 140.39, 139.73, 138.44, 138.26, 125.27, 121.93,
116.36, 107.46, 99.68, 44.10, 37.83, 34.20; HRMS (ESI, positive) m/z
calcd for C19H15BrFN10O6 (M ꢁ H)- 577.0349, found 577.0336.
at 37 ꢀC, human IFN-
g (50 ng/mL), Trp (15 mg/mL) and test
7