COMMUNICATIONS
H
a)
H
H
H
O
4 + 5
O
Cl
Cl
O
a)
+
H
H
H
H
H
O
O
O
O
Cl
O
Cl
OH
H
b)
H
H
H
H
O
O
O
O
4
5
H
N
N
H
cis-10
cis-9
O
O
Cl
Cl
Ru
Ph
2
3
PCy3
b)
H
c)
A
c)
H
O
H
d)
O
O
H
H
d)
O
O
H
H
H
H
H
O
O
H
O
H
O
H
H
O
O
O
PhSe
Cl
NC
NC CN
CN
O
SePh
12
(E,Z)-11
(E,E)-13
15
(E,Z)-14
Scheme 3. Displacement reactions of cis-3,4-dichlorocyclobutene (4)
(syn SN2' vs. anti SN2'). Reagents and conditions: a) (syn SN2') NaH
(2.0 equiv), THF, 258C, 1 h; then 4 (1.1 equiv), 608C, 10 h, 80%; b) (con-
rotatory) toluene, 1108C, 3 h, 85 %; c) (anti SN2') PhSeCl (1.2 equiv), NaH
(2.2 equiv), DMF, 258C, 0.5 h, then 9 or 10, 258C, 6 h, 85%; d) (conrota-
tory). DMF N,N-dimethylformamide.
Scheme 4. Tandem ring opening/ring closing metathesis reaction and
conrotatory ring-opening Diels Alder reaction of cyclobutene derivative
3. Reagents and conditions: a) 5 (1.0 equiv), NaH (2.0 equiv), THF, 258C,
1 h; then 4 (0.5 equiv), 608C, 15 h, 85%; b) A (Grubbs× catalyst; 5 mol%),
toluene, 458C, 12 h, 80%; c) toluene, 1108C, 3 h, 90%; d) TCNE
(5.0 equiv), toluene, 1108C, 3 h, 72%.
conrotatory opening of the cyclobutene ring, thus leading to
absence of TCNE, whereas the C2-symmetric Diels Alder
product 15 was formed exclusively in72% yield inthe
presence of TCNE, again as a consequence of the stereo-
specificity of the reactions.
The diolefin 2 was epoxidized inthe desired random way by
reactionwith methyl(trifluoromethyl)dioxiraen, which was
generated in situ (CH3CN, 0 !258C),[10] to furnish all four
possible epoxides 16 19 (Scheme 5) in90% total yield and in
a ratio of approximately 1:1:1:1. Uponchromatographic
separation, three of these epoxides (16, 17, an d19) crystallized
the E,Z-chlorodiene system 11 (85% yield), whose geometry
was confirmed by 1H NMR spectroscopy (Jcis 7.0 Hz, Jtrans
12.1 Hz).[4] This thermally induced reaction required relative-
ly high temperatures and was in accordance with the expected
cis stereochemistry of the cyclobutene derivatives 9 and 10.
Therefore, the displacement of chloride from 4 must have
followed a syn SN2' mechanism[4] inwhich the nucleophile
approached the cyclobutene ring from the same side as the
departing chloride ion. In contrast, the anti SN2' attack[6] of the
phenylselenyl anion on chlorobutene derivative 9 or 10 or a
mixture of the two to furnish directly the E,E-phenylseleno-
diene 13 (85% yield) is inferred on the basis of the known
propensity of trans-cyclobutene derivatives to open through a
conrotatory process at much lower temperatures than their cis
counterparts.[7] No phenylselenocyclobutene derivative 12
was detected in this displacement reaction, which suggests
both the anti SN2' mode of reactivity of PhSeÀ with the
chlorocyclobutenes 9 and 10 and the rapid conrotatory
opening of the presumed trans-1,2-phenylselenocyclobutene
12 to the E,E-phenylselenodiene 13 at ambient temperature.
Treatment of 4 with two equivalents of the sodium alkoxide
derived from 5 at 608C for 15 h gave 3 in85% yield
(Scheme 4; Table 1). The cyclobutene derivative 3 was then
exposed to the third-generation Grubbs× catalyst (A)[8] in
toluene at 458C to afford the desired tetracycle 2 in80%
Table 1. Selected physical properties of compounds 3, 16, an d22.
3: Colorless syrup; Rf 0.37 (silica gel, Et2O/hexane 1:1); [a]2D5 50.8
(c 3.2, CHCl3); IR (film): nÄmax 2931, 2848, 1725, 1437, 1331, 1272, 1161,
1084, 990, 931, 831 cmÀ1
;
1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): d 6.29 (m, 2H),
6.09 (ddd, J 17.2, 11.7, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 6.02 (ddd, J 17.2, 11.7, 6.6 Hz, 1H),
5.35 (dt, J 17.2, 1.7 Hz, 2H), 5.19 (m, 2H), 4.65 (t, J 2.4 Hz, 1H), 4.61 (t,
J 2.6 Hz, 1H), 3.93 (m, 2H), 3.64 (m, 2H), 3.38 (m, 2H), 3.23 (m, 1H),
3.11 (m, 1H), 2.20 (m, 2H), 1.66 (m, 4H), 1.53 (m, 2H); 13C NMR
(125 MHz, CDCl3): d 142.7, 141.8, 137.0, 136.6, 116.3, 116.2, 81.5, 81.4,
81.0, 80.8, 77.8, 77.2, 67.3 (2 C), 30.7, 30.6, 25.4, 25.2; HRMS (MALDI):
calcd for C18H26O4 [MNa ]: 329.1723, found: 329.1727
16: Colorless crystals; m.p. 146 1498C (Et2O/hexane 1:1); Rf 0.55 (silica
gel, Et2O/hexane 4:1); [a]D25 10.4 (c 0.61, MeOH); IR (film): nÄmax
2942, 2855, 1440, 1266, 1135, 1092, 1023, 955, 837, 793, 725 cmÀ1; 1H NMR
(500 MHz, CDCl3): d 4.15 (d, J 10.2 Hz, 1H), 3.99 (m, 3H), 3.63 (d, J
4.4 Hz, 1H), 3.45 (m, 6H), 3.30 (d, J 3.6 Hz, 1H), 3.07 (m, 2H), 1.98 (m,
2H), 1.72 (m, 4H), 1.41 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): d 77.8,
75.4, 72.1, 71.0, 69.4, 68.9, 68.8, 68.7, 55.2, 55.1, 52.3, 50.4, 29.2, 29.0, 25.6,
yield. Despite close precedent for this olefin metathesis
25.5; HRMS (MALDI): calcd for C16H22O6 [MNa ]: 333.1309, found:
[9]
reactionwith less sterically hindered substrates,
the first-
333.1302
generation Grubbs' catalyst [(Cy3P)2Cl2Ru CHPh] failed to
induce the desired reaction. To explore the chemistry of
intermediates encountered on the way to the main target, a
solutionof compound 3 intoluene was heated at reflux inthe
absence and in the presence of tetracyanoethylene (TCNE).
As expected from the cis stereochemistry of the cyclobutene
derivative 3, the E,Z diene system 14 was the only product of
this conrotatory ring-opening reaction (90% yield) in the
22: Colorless crystals; m.p. 99 1018C (Et2O/hexane 1:1); Rf 0.17 (silica
gel, Et2O); [a]2D5 39.4 (c 0.53, MeOH); IR (film): nÄmax 3412, 2931,
2860, 2096, 1325, 1261, 1090, 1043, 726 cmÀ1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3):
d 4.38 (d, J 10.6 Hz, 1H), 4.24 (t, J 3.4 Hz, 1H), 4.00 (m, 4H), 3.85
(dd, J 5.5, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 3.71 (d, J 10.6 Hz, 1H), 3.50 (m, 6H), 3.14 (d,
J 6.2 Hz, 1H), 2.94 (d, J 4.7 Hz, 1H), 2.10 (m, 1H), 2.00 (m, 1H), 1.74
(m, 4H), 1.43 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): d 76.6, 75.4, 75.2,
72.5, 70.8, 68.4 (2C), 67.1, 67.0, 66.8, 61.5, 60.6, 29.4, 29.1, 25.2, 25.1; HRMS
(MALDI): calcd for C16H24N6O6 [MNa ]: 419.1649, found: 419.1634
4442
¹ WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, D-69451 Weinheim, 2001
1433-7851/01/4023-4442 $ 17.50+.50/0
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, No. 23