Published on Web 06/23/2005
Conjugation Enhancement of Intramolecular Exciton Migration
in Poly(p-phenylene ethynylene)s
Evgueni E. Nesterov,† Zhengguo Zhu, and Timothy M. Swager*
Contribution from the Department of Chemistry and Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
Received March 25, 2005; E-mail: tswager@mit.edu
Abstract: Efficient energy migration in conjugated polymers is critical to their performance in photovoltaic,
display, and sensor devices. The ability to precisely control the polymer conformation is a key issue for the
experimental investigations and deeper understanding of the nature of this process. We make use of specially
designed iptycene-containing poly(p-phenylene ethynylene)s that display chain-extended conformations
when dissolved in nematic liquid crystalline solvents. In these solutions, the polymers show a substantial
enhancement in the intrachain exciton migration rate, which is attributed to their increased conjugation
length and better alignment. The organizational enhancement of the energy transfer efficiency, as determined
by site-selective emission from lower energy traps at the polymer termini, is accompanied by a significant
increase of the fluorescence quantum yield. The liquid crystalline phase is a necessary requirement for
these phenomena to occur, and when the temperature was increased above the nematic-isotropic transition,
we observed a dramatic reduction of the energy transfer efficiency and fluorescence quantum yield. The
ability to improve the exciton migration efficiency through precise control of the polymer structure with
liquid crystalline solutions demonstrates the importance of a polymer’s conformation for energy transfer,
and provides a way to improve the energy transporting performance of conjugated polymers.
Introduction
intramolecular exciton migration in isolated polymer chains may
indeed be very efficient.6
The ability of conjugated polymers to function as gain media
in electro-optical and sensory devices is dependent on the
efficient transport of excited states (excitons) along the polymer
chain. We have been specifically interested in facile exciton
migration in conjugated polymers in general, and poly(p-
phenylene ethynylene)s (PPEs) in particular, that allows energy
absorbed over large areas to be funneled into traps created by
the binding of analytes, resulting in signal amplification in
sensory devices.1-3 The energy migration in conjugated poly-
mers can occur both intramolecularly and intermolecularly. In
the case of dilute solutions, the intramolecular process dominates
in the form of a one-dimensional exciton random walk along
isolated chains.4 Much higher efficiency can be reached in
polymer aggregates and in solid films, where the energy
migration occurs as a three-dimensional process by both
intramolecular and intermolecular pathways. The interplay
between these two pathways has received much attention in the
literature, with the intrachain migration being sometimes
considered slow and inefficient as compared to its interchain
counterpart.5 However, recent experiments have shown that the
Emissive polymer films with modest to high quantum yields
generally have limited electronic interactions between polymer
chains, and in this case interchain energy migration is generally
accepted to occur through the dipole-induced dipole mecha-
nisms. The three-dimensional nature of energy migration in films
usually leads to longer exciton diffusion lengths, but often is
accompanied by formation of low-emissive intermolecular
species, resulting in diminished emission quantum yields.7 A
detailed understanding of intramolecular energy transfer in
conjugated polymers is presently elusive and is complicated by
the conformational complexities that are typically associated
with conjugated polymers in solution and in thin films. An
exception is a previous study4a wherein the rate of energy
transfer was investigated on PPEs assembled into discrete
multilayers with precise control of polymer conformation and
alignment. This study indicated that energy transfer was much
(5) (a) Beljonne, D.; Pourtois, G.; Silva, C.; Hennebicq, E.; Hertz, L. M.; Friend,
R. H.; Scholes, G. D.; Setayesh, S.; Mu¨llen, K.; Bre´das, J. L. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 10982-10987. (b) Nguyen, T.-Q.; Wu, J.; Doan,
V.; Schwartz, B. J.; Tolbert, S. H. Science 2000, 288, 652-656. (c) Wang,
C. F.; White, J. D.; Lim, T. L.; Hsu, J. H.; Yang, S. C.; Fann, W. S.; Peng,
K. Y.; Chen, S. A. Phys. ReV. B 2003, 67, 035202.
† Current address: Department of Chemistry, Louisiana State University,
Baton Rouge, LA 70803.
(6) (a) Mu¨ller, J. G.; Lemmer, U.; Raschke, G.; Anni, M.; Scherf, U.; Lupton,
J. M.; Feldmann, J. Phys. ReV. Lett. 2003, 91, 267403. (b) Mu¨ller, J. G.;
Lupton, J. M.; Feldman, J.; Lemmer, U.; Scherf, U. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004,
84, 1183-1185. (c) Lupton, J. M.; Craig, M. R.; Meijer, E. W. Appl. Phys.
Lett. 2002, 80, 4489-4491. (d) Padmanaban, G.; Ramakrishnan, S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2244-2251. (e) Guillet, T.; Berre´har, J.; Grousson,
R.; Kovensky, J.; Lapersonne-Meyer, C.; Schott, M.; Voliotis, V. Phys.
ReV. Lett. 2001, 87, 087401.
(1) McQuade, D. T.; Pullen, A. E.; Swager, T. M. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100,
2537-2574.
(2) (a) Zhou, Q.; Swager, T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7017-7018.
(b) Swager, T. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 201-207.
(3) Bunz, U. H. F. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 1605-1644.
(4) (a) Levitsky, I. A.; Kim, J.; Swager, T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,
1466-1472. (b) Levitsky, I. A.; Kim, J.; Swager, T. M. Macromolecules
2001, 34, 2315-2319.
(7) Schwartz, B. J. Annu. ReV. Phys. Chem. 2003, 54, 141-172.
9
10.1021/ja051936g CCC: $30.25 © 2005 American Chemical Society
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2005, 127, 10083-10088
10083