.
Angewandte
Communications
ments. First, to elucidate the absolute configuration at
positions C22 and C24, the polyene was subjected to
ozonolysis (Scheme 1A). The resulting oxidative degradation
product (3) was hydrolyzed using 6m HCl and derivatized
using Marfeyꢀs reagent for Ala, and (S)-PGME (phenyl-
glycine methylester) for (R)-methylsuccinate. Since the RP-
HPLC analysis of the l-FDAA (1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrophenyl-5-
l-alanine amide) derivative of the hydrolysate revealed the
identity of d-Ala, we could unequivocally assign an R confi-
guration to position C22. The di-(S)-PGME amide of hydro-
lyzed 3 showed the same retention time as the (R)-methyl-
succinate di-(S)-PGME amide on the HPLC column, thus
indicating the R configuration at C24.
To elucidate the absolute configuration at C2, again the
formation of a PGME amide provided valuable insights. From
the DdSR values of the thailandamide A-derived (S)- and (R)-
PGME amides 4a and 4b, respectively, we deduced the
R configuration of position C2. The configuration of C3,
however, could not be determined in this way. Therefore, we
inspected the NOE correlations of the g-butyrolactone ring in
the thailandamide lactone 5, a congener and derivative of
1 produced by B. thailandensis DPthaA. From these correla-
tions we were able to unequivocally deduce the S configura-
tion at C3. The determination of the absolute configurations
at positions C13 and C29 proved to be most challenging, since
no reference compounds were available for fragments
obtained by ozonolysis. Furthermore, treatment with Mosh-
erꢀs reagent (MTPA; a-methoxy-a-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl-
acetic acid) chloride gave mixed products, including the
mono-MTPA ester at the phenolic position of 1. Unexpect-
edly, attempts to selectively protect the phenolic group
yielded several by-products because of the temperature
sensitivity of 1. To circumvent these limitations we aimed at
generating a thailandamide variant lacking the phenolic OH
group. Since a synthetic method for achieving this was out of
reach, we attempted producing this derivative by precursor-
directed biosynthesis. Analysis of the polyketide backbone
suggested that p-hydroxphenylacetate (PHPA) served as
a starter unit which is loaded onto the first PKS module.
The deoxy variant of 1 would in principle result from the
incorporation of phenylacetate (PA). After optimization of
production parameters, we eventually achieved this goal by
supplementing a B. thailandensis DPthaA culture with the
nonnatural starter unit in minimal medium (Scheme 1B).
HPLC-HRMS monitoring of the fermentation indicated that
the mutant indeed incorporated phenylacetate (Figure 1,
trace c).
Figure 1. HPLC profiles of a sample of purified thailandamide B [2;
(a)], extracts from cultures of B. thailandensis DPthaA (b), extracts
from cultures of B. thailandensis DPthaA supplemented with phenyl-
acetate in minimal medium (c), and d) extracts from cultures of B.
thailandensis DPthA/DTE double mutant. UV absorbance at l=317 nm
(a–c) and l=220 nm (d). 6’: Putative deoxythailandamide B;
*: unidentified unstable (deoxy)thailandamides.
Gly, Ala, and Val. Since the chemical analyses showed that 1 is
derived from d-Ala, it is surprising that the condensation (C)
domain does not have a dual condensation/epimerization
function.[11] Consequently, this seems to be a rare scenario
where an A domain incorporates a d-amino acid, as for
example in the cyclosporin synthetase.[12] Next, we predicted
all ketoreductase (KR) domain specificities[13–15] in the
thailandamide PKS. For the hydroxy-substituted positions,
the KR finger printing fully matched with the detected
configurations at C29(l/R) and C13 (d/S; see Table S7 in the
Supporting Information). Interestingly, the S configuration of
the methoxy-substituted carbon atom (C3) could not be
predicted since the product is not colinear with the architec-
ture of module 13, which lacks a KR domain. The domain
organization could be suggestive for a route involving
enolization and methylation, followed by hydrogenation.[8]
A likely candidate is the trans-enoylreductase (trans-ER)
domain in ThaF, which controls the absolute configuration at
C24. While stereocontrol of enoylreductases has been
unveiled for cis-AT PKS systems,[16–18] the predictions are
not adaptable for the trans-ER in trans-AT PKS systems,
which are more similar to PfaD in polyunsaturated fatty acid
(PUFA) biosynthesis.[19] However, one may assume that the
stereochemical course of enoyl reduction would be compara-
ble for C24 and C2/3, but no clear mechanistic analogies could
be drawn. Thus, a more plausible alternative would be the
iterative use of a KR domain upstream of module 13. Indeed
all vicinal KR domains produce d-hydroxy groups, which is in
accord with the observed S configuration at C3. Furthermore,
by using HPLC-HRMS we were able to detect the exact mass
for predicted hydroxy-substituted intermediate in a DTE-
mutant (see below, and the Supporting Information).
An isolation/purification workflow as established for
1 yielded sufficient amounts of deoxythailandamide A (6;
(Scheme 1B), which could be readily esterified by MTPA
chloride without the formation of any side products. Finally,
the DdSR values of the deoxythailandamide A-derived di-(S)-
and di-(R)-MTPA esters 7a and 7b, respectively, revealed an
S configuration for C13 and an R configuration for C29. To
complement the stereochemical analysis, we analyzed the
enzymatic domains encoded in the tha gene locus (Scheme 2).
According to NRPSPredictor2,[10] the adenylation (A)
domain of ThaH has the amino acid code DMPQLGMVWK,
which indicates a preference for small amino acids such as
As to the double-bond architectures, previous work
suggested that the dehydratase (DH) domain mediates an
2
ꢀ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1 – 6
These are not the final page numbers!