X. Meng, et al.
CatalysisCommunications146(2020)106127
2. Experimental
Au/CMK-3
Au/ZrO2-623
100
80
60
40
20
2.1. Materials
Au/ZrO2-823
All chemicals (AR grade) were purchased commercially and used as
received unless otherwise noted. HAuCl4·4H2O (99.99%) and AgNO3
(≥99.8%) were supplied by Sinopharm Chemicals (Beijing, China). The
commercial ZrO2 support was purchased from Shanghai Macklin
Biochemical Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Mesoporous carbon CMK-3 was
homemade as described in our previous work [13]. MEA (> 99.0%),
NaOH (> 99.0%), and acetaldehyde (99.5%) were from Xilong Scien-
tific Co., Ltd. (Guangdong, China). O2 (99.9%) was supplied by Beijing
Beiwen Gas Factory (Beijing, China). Maleic acid (internal standard for
quantitative NMR analysis) and all other standard samples were pur-
chased from Sigma-Aldrich Trading Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
1
2
3
Run
2.2. Catalyst preparation
Fig. 1. Reusability of Au/ZrO2–623 (MEA/Au
=
300/1 (mol/mol)), Au/
ZrO2–823 (MEA/Au = 300/1(mol/mol)), and Au/CMK-3 (MEA/Au = 500/1
(mol/mol)) in MEA oxidation. Reaction conditions: CMEA = 0.3 M, NaOH/
MEA = 4, T = 323 K, P(O2) = 0.5 MPa, stirring speed = 1000 r/min, average
catalyst diameter = 106 μm, and t = 2 h.
The Au/ZrO2 catalysts were prepared by deposition-precipitation
method as described before [6], and the obtained catalysts calcined at
623 K and 823 K were labelled as Au/ZrO2–623 and Au/ZrO2–823,
respectively. The Au/CMK-3 catalyst was prepared using a deposition-
reduction method as described in our previous study [13].
The active component loading is of vital importance for a catalytic
reaction and metal leaching cannot be excluded in the solvent medium
[5,6]. Au loadings of the fresh and recycled catalysts were investigated
through chemical analysis by ICP. The result showed that the Au con-
tent of the as-prepared Au/ZrO2–623 was 0.8 wt%, and that of the
catalyst after three runs was the same. That is, no obvious metal
leaching was observed during the reaction, and thus Au leaching was
not the reason for deactivation.
2.3. Evaluation of the catalyst and the reusability
Oxidation of MEA was used to evaluate the catalytic activity of the
catalysts, and the reaction was conducted according to the described
procedures reported in literature [5,6]. After reaction, the solid catalyst
was separated from the liquid by filtration, washed with deionized
water and dried at 323 K. Then the catalytic activity of the recycled
catalyst was evaluated following the same procedure as that for the
fresh one.
The surface elements and their corresponding contents of the fresh
and recycled Au/ZrO2–623 were then analyzed, as shown in Table 1. N
species were present in the recycled catalyst after three runs because of
the possible adhesion of the reactant or products on the catalyst surface,
consistent with the reported strong interactions between the amino
group and noble metals [1,3]. Comparing the element contents of the
recycled catalyst with those of the fresh one, no obvious change was
found for the surface contents of Zr and Cl, while the surface content of
the active Au element decreased remarkably from 0.37% to 0.09%.
Considering that no metal leaching occurred during the reaction as
proved before, the low surface content of Au may result from the de-
crease of Au dispersion [6]. EDS mapping was also performed to study
element compositions and distributions of Au/ZrO2–623 catalyst before
reaction and after being used for three runs. As shown in Figs. S1 and
S2, ESI, Au and Zr were the dominant metallic elements for both fresh
and recycled catalysts. For Au/ZrO2–623 after being used for three
runs, the line analysis of the elements shown in Fig. S2b confirmed the
presence of larger Au particles. The Au 4f XPS spectra of fresh and
recycled Au/ZrO2–623 were collected, as shown in Fig. S3, ESI. The
valence distribution of Au species was determined by subjecting the Au
4f peaks to deconvolution, and no obvious difference of the proportion
of metallic gold species was found before and after reaction (89% vs.
91%), indicating that catalytic deactivation was not caused by variation
3. Results and discussion
It is widely accepted that preparation method, support, and the
particle size play key roles on the properties of Au catalysts, which
determine the catalytic performance including stability of the catalyst.
Therefore, Au catalysts with different Au particle sizes or supports, i.e.,
Au/ZrO2–623, Au/ZrO2–823 and Au/CMK-3, were prepared for the
aqueous oxidation of MEA, and their properties were characterized. As
shown in Table S1, ESI, the Au loadings of both the Au/ZrO2–623 and
Au/ZrO2–823 catalysts were 0.8 wt%. The calcination temperature has
negligible influence on the specific surface area (SBET) of the catalysts
despite the significant difference of the Au particle sizes (4.7 nm for Au/
ZrO2–623 vs. 8.1 nm for Au/ZrO2–823). Mesoporous carbon CMK-3
supported Au catalyst has a little bit higher Au loading of 0.9 wt% with
smaller Au particle size of 3.7 nm and much larger SBET of 1164 m2/g.
The large difference in properties of the catalysts, including the Au
particle size, type and structure of the supports, made it possible to
reveal the catalytic stability of different Au catalysts in the liquid-phase
oxidation of alcohols.
The liquid-phase oxidation of MEA was selected as a model reaction
to test the stability of Au catalysts with different preparation methods,
Au particle sizes, and supports. The reusability of the catalysts is shown
in Fig. 1. In the oxidation of MEA, all the three catalysts showed ob-
vious loss of activity during the reaction process. MEA conversion over
Au/ZrO2–623 obviously decreased from 99% (fresh catalyst) to 17% in
the third run, and that over Au/ZrO2–823 decreased from 68% to 17%.
Mesoporous carbon CMK-3 supported gold catalyst showed slower de-
crease in MEA conversion from 60% to 27% due to the porous structure
of CMK-3 and partial particles inside the pores [13,14]. The evident
catalytic deactivation for all the tested gold catalysts indicated that
deactivation was common for catalysts with various Au particle sizes
and supports.
Table 1
Surface elements and their contents of fresh and recycled Au/ZrO2–623 after
three runs.
Au/
ZrO2–623
Ausurf (%) Zrsurf (%) Osurf (%) Csurf (%) Nsurf (%) Clsurf (%)
Fresh
Recycled
after
0.37
0.09
20.8
19.6
50.0
56.76
16.3
11.0
0
0.66
12.4
11.9
three
runs
2