Dynamics of Radicals in MFI Zeolites
work between the pores. The internal void space consists
of channels (ca. 5.5 Å in diameter) that intersect to
produce roughly spherical supercages of ca. 9 Å in
diameter.9,10 The molecular cross section of the guest
ketone 1 is small enough to enter the pores on the
external surface of ZSM-5. Under low-loading conditions
1 is exclusively adsorbed on the internal surface. Con-
versely, the guest ketones 2-4 are adsorbed on the
external surface, because the molecular cross sections of
the ketones are too large to enter the pores of ZSM-5.
Evidence has been produced that the ketones 2-4
predominantly adsorb at the pore openings of the exter-
nal surface.5
the radicals.13 A decrease in rotational motion is consis-
tent with a concomitant decrease in diffusional motion.
The data in Figure 1 are consistent with a correlation
of the variation of the molecular structure of the guest
on the observed decay of the guest@zeolite system.
However, since we are dealing with a supramolecular
system, the decay is expected to depend on the variation
of the structure of the host zeolite also. The most subtle
variation of the host structure is the variation of the
exchangeable cations associated with the negatively
charged Al atoms of the zeolite framework. The cations
can be expected to interact with the radicals, both
sterically and electrostatically. Previous studies have
indicated that electrostatic interactions of the cations
with hydrocarbon radicals are not as important as steric
interactions.14 The data in Figure 2 speak for a dominat-
ing steric effect on the decay of the radicals through
radical-radical reactions in the zeolite supercages. The
larger the cation, the slower the decay. However, for
cations Li, Na, and K, the line widths of the EPR spectra
are similar and relatively sharp, indicating a similar and
relatively high degree of rotational motion (and, by
inference, diffusional motion) for these radicals. Only in
the case of M ) Rb and Cs is line broadening significant.
These results are consistent with the main effect of the
cation as being due to steric inhibition of radical-radical
reaction in the zeolite supercages. This conclusion in turn
suggests that the cations are associated with the super-
cages so that they are effective at the time of radical-
radical reaction. It is also possible that Rb and Cs cause
an increase in line broadening due to an increase in
radical relaxation resulting from increased spin-orbit
coupling.15
Photolysis of the complexes 1-4@ZSM-5 generated the
benzyl radical pairs 1R-4R@ZSM-5. The decay curves
shown in Figures 1 and 2 represent an example of “flash
photolysis” with a time resolution in the orders of
seconds. In this experimental configuration only radicals
with a lifetime longer than ca. 1 s can be observed. The
highly mobile benzyl radicals 2R-4R on the external
surface are expected to recombine rapidly and are,
therefore, “invisible” in our EPR measurements. It is
expected that only the radicals, which can escape into
the pores on the internal surface, possess a lifetime long
enough to be detected by EPR in our experimental
configuration.
The resulting lifetimes followed by EPR of radicals
1R-4R increase monotonically in the order 1R < 2R <
3R < 4R; i.e., as the group X attached to the radical
center increases from X ) H to X ) (CH2)4CH3, the rate
of decay of the radicals decreases. We attribute this
correlation to a supramolecular steric effect on radical-
radical reactions which determine the lifetime of the
radicals under observation. From computer-simulated
molecular models, only the radical-radical combination
of benzyl radicals, 1R, to form 1,2-diphenylethane is
sterically plausible in the supercages of the internal
surface of the MFI zeolite. Product studies showed that
the radicals 2R-4R predominantly undergo radical-
radical disproportionation on ZSM-5 zeolites.5 The con-
cept of a steric effect on the radical-radical reactions in
the internal supercages explains the correlation between
radical size and radical decay. This is a dramatic su-
pramolecular steric effect on the radical-radical reaction,
since in ordinary solvents all of the radicals investigated
undergo radical-radical combination at close to the
diffusion-controlled rate.11,12
Con clu sion s
CW-EPR analysis of supramolecular complexes 1R-
4R@MZSM-5, generated by photolysis of 1-4@MZSM-
5, provided information on the supramolecular dynamics
of the radicals. The lifetimes of the radicals increased as
the group X attached to the radical center increases from
X ) H to X ) (CH2)4CH3. This correlation was attributed
to a supramolecular steric effect on the radical-radical
reactions, which determine the radical lifetimes. In
addition, line broadening of the EPR signal (associated
with a decrease in rotational motion) is consistent with
the notion of decreased mobility as the group X attached
to the radical center increases. EPR experiments involv-
ing cation-exchanged zeolites (MZSM-5; M ) Li, Na, K,
Rb, Cs) showed a strong dependence of the radical
lifetime on the size of the cation; i.e., the larger the cation,
the slower the decay. This is consistent with steric
inhibition of radical-radical reaction in the supercages.
In addition to a steric effect on the reaction step of two
radicals, there may also be a steric effect on the diffusion
of the radicals into a supercage. In other words, in the
zeolite internal surface, the diffusion of the smallest
radical 1R may be much faster than the diffusion of the
largest radical 4R. A dramatic dependence of the diffu-
sion rate on subtle changes in size is well established for
molecular diffusion in zeolites. This possibility is consis-
tent with the observed increase in line broadening in the
EPR spectra as the size of the radical increases. The
increased line broadening can be associated with a
decrease in the correlation time for rotational motion of
Exp er im en ta l Section
1,3-Diphenyl-2-propanone (1) was obtained from Aldrich and
purified by recrystallization from 5% (v/v) ether in hexane. 2,4-
Diphenylpentan-3-one (2), 3,5-diphenylheptan-4-one (3), and
(13) Berliner, L. J ., Ed. Spin Labeling. Theory and Applications;
Academic Press: New York, 1976.
(14) Turro, N. J .; Zhang, Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 5637-5640.
(15) Warrier, M.; Turro, N. J .; Ramamurthy, V. Tetrahedron Lett.
2000, 41, 7163-7167.
(11) Baretz, B. H.; Turro, N. J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 1309-
1316.
(12) Ghatlia, N. D.; Turro, N. J . J . Photochem. Photobiol., A: Chem.
1991, 57, 7-19.
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 67, No. 16, 2002 5781