phase changes between τ1 and τ2. Since an individual signal cannot
change in either of these two manners, asynchronous correlation
maps cannot contain autopeaks. Instead, the asynchronous maps
only show off diagonal peaks, which must be connected via the
τ1 ) τ1 diagonal to construct correlation squares between τ1 and
τ2. Again, these peaks may be positive or negative, but in this
case, a positive peak is obtained if an intensity change in τ1 occurs
before an intensity change in τ2; negative peaks are delayed
responses, and thus an intensity change in τ1 occurs after an
intensity change in τ2. This rule, however, is reversed when the
synchronous correlation intensity at the corresponding coordinate
is negative; i.e., Φ(τ1, τ2) < 0. Collectively, these relations are
known as Noda’s rules.3
In the context of 2DCOR-GC, coeluting compounds exhibit τ1
≈ τ2 and thus may give rise to a single chromatographic peak.
However, provided that the two compounds exhibit different
dynamic behavior, an asynchronous relationship can still arise,
even if the two signals are moving in the same direction. This
point is of great importance to cross-correlation chromatography,
since rarely do two separate compounds chromatographically
behave identically, and thus identification of coelution can be
simplified enormously, as demonstrated in this paper.
In this paper, we describe and validate the application of the
2D correlation analysis as directed toward gas chromatography,
with the aim both to optimize and to understand chemical
reactions performed in supercritical fluids (SCFs). An SCF is
defined as any substance that is above its critical temperature and
pressure (but below the pressure required to form a solid) and
close to its critical density.18 SCFs exhibit a unique combination
of gaslike and liquidlike properties.19 This combination of unique
properties enables an SCF to dissolve both liquids and solids,
where the solubility is generally pressure dependent. This
phenomenon has been exploited to reduce mass transport limita-
tions present during hydrogenation reactions.20,21 More recently
it was used to tune reaction conversion and selectivity in a wide
range of synthetically valuable transformations.22,23 However, the
interrelation of SCF reaction parameters, conversion, and selectiv-
ity are not always simple, and much research is needed to
understand the role of phase behavior and catalyst activity.24 Some
of these research activities involve continuous fixed-bed catalytic
reactors interfaced to on-line GC analysis.25 Such apparatus can
yield so much data that information about the reaction can only
be extracted with difficulty. It is our intent to tackle this
superabundance of data that leads to the development of 2DCOR-
GC.
useful information about a real reaction under SCF conditions.
Therefore, we first validate 2DCOR-GC by analyzing the relatively
simple supercritical reverse water-gas shift reaction (RWGSR),
shown by eq 1, and then apply the same technique to the
CO2 + H2 h CO + H2O
(1)
continuous alkylation of m-cresol over a solid acid catalyst in
supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2).
The RWGSR is a well-known reversible reaction in equilibrium
among CO, H2O, CO2, and H2. It is particularly relevant to
reactions in SCFs, because it is a potential side reaction in the
hydrogenation of organic compounds in scCO2 where it generates
CO, a toxic gas, which can poison the catalyst. The advantage of
choosing a reaction like the RWGSR from the point of view of
validating 2DCOR-GC is that there are relatively few simple
analytical instruments that can detect all four components simul-
taneously. However, there are many that can detect two or three
of the components. In this paper, we have used three instruments,
FT-IR and two separate micro-GCs fitted with different analytical
columns (M5A and HSA, respectively), each of which can quantify
only three of the components. However, by 2D correlation of the
outputs from these instruments, we can obtain a full analytical
picture of the equilibrium. Furthermore, the simplicity of the
equilibrium means that it is easy to check that the 2D correlation
is producing meaningful results. The RWGSR actually has a more
immediate application in our own research interest area, since it
is a key process in the generation of H2 + CO2 mixtures by the
catalytic decomposition of HCO2H, which we are using as a route
to miniaturizing supercritical hydrogenation “without gases”.26
The second part of this paper involves applying 2DCOR-GC
to continuous Friedel-Crafts alkylation in scCO2. These reactions
still have serious mechanistic and analytical questions,27 which
can be addressed by 2DCOR-GC. Furthermore, the nature of these
experiments makes it very easy to apply appropriate perturbations
that are needed for successful 2DCOR-GC studies.
The Friedel-Crafts alkylation of aromatics is a valuable
synthetic tool that is widely employed in industry. Usually the
aim is to make the monoalkylated product often with the alkylation
occurring at a specific location on the aromatic ring. Traditionally,
this is achieved by using an excess of a Lewis or Brønsted acid
catalyst.28 The chemistry, however, often ends up being environ-
mentally unfriendly, generating an excess of acidic waste that
requires a large amount of cleanup. The reaction in scCO2 offers
a promising route to cleaner alkylation by using solid acid
catalysts, particularly in a continuous process.23,29,30 Performing
this reaction in a continuous reactor gives several advantages
including ease of catalyst and solvent separation, shorter reaction
times, control of reactant concentrations and continuous produc-
tion of product from a small reactor volume.22 Thymol (T, Chart
1) is a commercial product that can be produced by the Friedel-
The primary purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the validity
of our technique and to show that it really can provide chemically
(18) A. D. M. IUPAC Recommendations; Blackwell Science Ltd.: Oxford, U.K.,
1997.
(19) Hyde, J. R.; Leitner, W.; Poliakoff, M. In High-Pressure Chemistry; Eldik, R.
V., Klarner, F., Eds.; Wiley VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2002; p 371.
(20) Hitzler, M. G.; Poliakoff, M. Chem. Commun. 1 9 9 7 , 1667-1668.
(21) Hitzler, M. G.; Smail, F. R.; Ross, S. K.; Poliakoff, M. Org. Proc. Res. Dev.
1 9 9 8 , 2, 137-146.
(26) Hyde, J. R.; Poliakoff, M. Chem. Commun. 2 0 0 4 , 13, 1482-1484.
(27) Albright, L. F. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1 9 9 8 , 37, 296-297.
(28) Olah, G. A. Friedel-Crafts and Related Reactions; Wiley Interscience:
London, 1963.
(29) Chateauneuf, J. E.; Nie, K. Abstr. Pap. Am. Chem. Soc. 2 0 0 0 , 219, 446-
ORGN.
(22) Hitzler, M. G.; Smail, F. R.; Ross, S. K.; Poliakoff, M. Chem. Commun. 1 9 9 8 ,
359-360.
(23) Gray, W. K.; Smail, F. R.; Hitzler, M. G.; Ross, S. K.; Poliakoff, M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1 9 9 9 , 121, 10711-10718.
(24) Grunwaldt, J. D.; Wandeler, R.; Baiker, A. Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng. 2 0 0 3 , 45,
1-96.
(30) Funamoto, G.; Tamura, S.; Segawa, K.; Wan, K. T.; Davis, M. E. Res. Chem.
Intermed. 1 9 9 8 , 24, 449-459.
(25) Walsh, B.; Hyde, J. R.; Poliakoff, M. Green Chemistry, submitted.
Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 76, No. 21, November 1, 2004 6199