´
Scale-Up Studies for the Asymmetric Julia–Colonna Epoxidation
UPDATES
(82 mL, 0.410 mol, 1.3 equivs.). After cooling to 158C 30% hy-
References and Notes
drogen peroxide (162 mL, 1.57 mol, 5 equivs.) was added at
that temperature (slightly exothermic) and the resulting heter-
ogeneous mixture was warmed to 258C again. This mixture was
then kept at 258C for 1 hour before chalcone 2 (100 g,
0.318mol, 1.0 equiv.) was added as a solid. Subsequently, the
reaction was stirred for 20 hours in the dark at 258C. The reac-
tion mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate (1500 mL) and
quenched by addition of ice-cold 20% aqueous NaHSO3 solu-
tion (100 mL). A peroxide test of the aqueous layer was nega-
tive. After addition of water (1000 mL) a phase separation fur-
nished an organic layer containing epoxide 4 and an aqueous
layer containing insoluble poly-l-leucine. Poly-l-leucine was
then filtered out and washed with ethyl acetate (100 mL).
The combined organic layers were dried over sodium sulphate,
filtered and concentrated under vacuum to afford a beige solid.
This material was crystallised from toluene (300 mL) to furnish
epoxy ketone 4 as a white solid; yield: 79 g (75%). Analysis by
chiral HPLC indicated 95.5% ee.
´
[1] a) S. Julia, J. Masana, J. C. Vega, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
´
Engl. 1980, 19, 929–931; b) S. Julia, J. Guixer, J. Masana,
J. Rocas, S. Colonna, R. Annuziata, H. Molinari, J.
Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1982, 1317–1324.
[2] a) C. Lauret, S. M. Roberts, Aldrichimica Acta 2002, 35,
47–51; b) M. J. Porter, S. M. Roberts, J. Skidmore, Bio-
org. Med. Chem. 1999, 7, 2145–2156.
[3] The reaction mixture observed by following the original
protocol[1] consists of an organic phase (toluene and
starting material/product), an inorganic aqueous phase
(sodium hydroxide and hydrogen peroxide) and a third
solid phase (insoluble polyamino acid catalyst).
[4] a) T. Geller, A. Gerlach, C. M. Krüger, H.-C. Militzer,
Chimia Oggi/Chemistry Today 2003, 21, 6–8; b) T. Gel-
ler, A. Gerlach, C. M. Krüger, H.-C. Militzer, Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 2004, 45, 5065–5067.
[5] E. P. Kohler, H. M. Chadwell, Org. Synth. Coll. Vol. I,
1941, 78 –8 0.
[6] Early screening experiments were conducted in magneti-
cally stirred vials (5 mL) using 75 mg (0.24 mmol) of
chalcone 2.
´
[7] a) M. E. Lasterra-Sanchez, U. Felfer, P. Mayon, S. M.
Preparation of Poly-l-leucine (pll) 7
Roberts, S. R. Thornton, C. J. Todd, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin
To a stirred suspension of l-leucine (5; 200 g, 1.51 mol, 1.0
equiv.) in THF (2000 mL) gaseous phosgene (507 g, 5.13 mol,
3.4 equivs.) was added continuously over 6.5 h. During this pe-
riod the reaction mixture became homogeneous and the reac-
tion temperature was allowed to rise to 338C. Stirring at ambi-
ent temperature was maintained for additional 16 h. Subse-
quently, most of the solvent THFand excess phosgene was dis-
tilled off at 358C/80 mbar. At this point n-hexane (1100 mL)
was added and a precipitate was formed. After stirring for
1 h the precipitate was filtered off and washed with n-hexane
(2ꢁ600 mL). Drying provided pure, crystalline l-leucine N-
carboxyanhydride (l-leu-NCA, 6); yield: 203 g (85%). Analyt-
ical data were in agreement with reported values.[8]
Freshly prepared l-leucine N-carboxyanhydride (l-leu-
NCA, 6; 100 g, 0.636 mol, 1.0 equiv.) was dissolved in anhy-
drous toluene (1500 mL) under argon at ambient temperature.
To this homogeneous solution was added the initiator 1,3-dia-
minopropane (0.589 g, 0.008 mol, 0.0125 equiv.). Subsequent-
ly, the reaction mixture was gradually heated to 808C over
2 h. During this period CO2 was liberated. Stirring was main-
tained for 1 h at 808C. After cooling down to 608C methanol
(1000 mL) was added. This heterogeneous reaction mixture
was stirred for 1 h at 608C before the solid was filtered off. Dry-
ing furnished poly-l-leucine (pll, 7); yield: 63 g (88%). The
product structure has been confirmed by MALDI-MS.
Trans. 1 1996, 343–348; b) W. Kroutil, M. E. Lasterra-
´
Sanchez, S. J. Maddrell, P. Mayon, P. Morgan, S. M. Rob-
erts, S. R. Thornton, C. J. Todd, M. Tüter, J. Chem. Soc.
Perkin Trans. 1 1996, 2837–2844; c) P. A. Bentley, W.
Kroutil, J. A. Littlechild, S. M. Roberts, Chirality 1997,
9, 198–202; d) S. Baars, K.-H. Drauz, H.-P. Krimmer,
S. M. Roberts, J. Sander, J. Skidmore, G. Zanardi, Org.
Process Res. Dev. 2003, 7, 509–513.
[8] a) F. Fuchs, Chem. Ber. 1922, 55, 2943; b) A. C. Farthing,
J. Chem. Soc. 1950, 3213–3217; c) W. H. Daly, D. Poche,
Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 5859–5862.
[9] Under the used conditions (see Scheme 2 and experi-
mental section) l-leu-NCA 6 was not accompanied by
a dark brown oil as described earlier.[7d]
[10] Further washings or grinding of the crude poly-l-leucine
7 had no effect on enantioselectivity or reaction rate.
[11] J. R. Flisak, K. J. Gombatz, M. M. Holmes, A. A. Jarmas,
I. Lantos, W. L. Mendelson, V. J. Novack, J. J. Remich, L.
Snyder, J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 6247–6254.
[12] This poly-l-leucine-1,3-diaminopropane catalyst is com-
mercially available from Fluka (product number: 93197).
[13] A single re-use of recovered poly-l-leucine catalyst 7 fur-
nished epoxy ketone 4 in 75% yield with 97.3% ee after
20 hours on a 100 g substrate scale.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 1247–1249
asc.wiley-vch.de
ꢀ 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1249