Table 2 Reaction of ethyl diazoacetate (EDA) with benzaldehyde in
the presence of [PPh Au(NCMe)]BF as the catalyst
3 4
observed. After 10 min of stirring, no EDA was detected by GC.
Volatiles were removed under vacuum and the residue dissolved in
a
3
CDCl and investigated by NMR spectroscopy. The compounds were
Entry
Temperature
[PhCHO]/[EDA]
% 1
% 2
identified by comparison with pure commercial samples and/or literature
data. It is important to note that both compounds 1 and 2 display
tautomeric equilibria in solution, the resonances of the keto and enol
forms being taking into account when calculating the ratio of products.
1
2
rt
rt
2
10
57
33
43
67
a
Catalyst loading = 1% referred to EDA, 0.01 mmol of [Au].
Reaction time, 10 min.
1
E. Buchner and Th. Curtius, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges., 1885, 18,
371.
W. Dieckmann, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges., 1910, 43, 1024.
2
2
3
P. De March and R. Huisgen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1982, 104,
4
We have also explored a related catalyst that contains
952.
the phosphine PPh instead of the NHC ligand. The
4
PPh Au(NCMe)]BF complex was prepared as previously
3
4
5
M. P. Doyle, M. A. McKervey and T. Ye, Modern Catalytic
Methods for Organic Synthesis with Diazo Compounds,
John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1998.
[
3
2
0
described and employed following the procedure identical
to that used with the NHC-containing catalyst. Two experi-
ments with two- and ten-fold excesses of benzaldehyde with
respect to EDA were carried out (Table 2). In both cases, all
the diazo compound was consumed within 10 min, also
showing a high catalytic activity. Regarding the selectivity,
the system behaves in a similar manner when using a ten-fold
excess of benzaldehyde (entry 5 Table 1 and entry 2 in
Table 2), but when lowering such excess, the phosphine-
containing catalyst provided more of the ketoester 1 than
the NHCAu catalyst (entry 3 in Table 1 and entry 1 in
Table 2). Therefore, it seems that the change from IPr to
(a) M. Liao and J. Wang, Tetrahedron Lett., 2006, 47, 8859;
(
b) C. R. Holmquist and E. J. Roskamp, J. Org. Chem., 1989,
4, 3258.
5
6 (a) B. M. Trost, S. Malhotra and B. A. Fried, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2009, 131, 1674; (b) M. L. Kantam, V. Balasubrahmanyam, K. B.
S. Kumar, G. T. Venkanna and F. Figueras, Adv. Synth. Catal.,
2
007, 349, 1887; (c) K. Hasegawa, S. Arai and A. Nishida,
Tetrahedron, 2006, 62, 1390; (d) W. Yao and J. Wang, Org. Lett.,
2003, 5, 1527.
M. P. Doyle, W. Hu and D. J. Timmons, Org. Lett., 2001, 3,
7
8
9
33.
M. P. Doyle, D. C. Forbes, M. N. Protopopova, S. A. Stanley,
M. M. Vasbinder and K. R. Xavier, J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62,
7210.
9
(a) S. J. Mahmood and M. M. Hossain, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63,
3333; (b) M. E. Dudley, M. M. Morshed, C. L. Brennan,
M. S. Islam, M. S. Ahmad, M.-R. Atuu, B. Branstetter and
3
PPh in the catalyst structure does not affect the activity but
induces a certain effect on the selectivity.
In conclusion, we have discovered that the complex
M. M. Hossain, J. Org. Chem., 2004, 69, 7599.
10 D. Benito-Garagorri, J. Wiedermann, M. Pollak, K. Mereiter and
K. Kirchner, Organometallics, 2007, 26, 217.
[
IPrAu(NCMe)]BF4 catalyzes the reaction of PhCHO and
ethyl diazoacetate leading to the formation of ethyl 3-hydroxy-
-phenylacrylate and ethyl 3-oxo-3-phenylpropanoate, the
1
1 (a) S. J. Mahmood, C. Brennan and M. Hossain, Synthesis, 2002,
807; (b) M. R. Atuu, S. J. Mahmood, F. Laib and M. M. Hossain,
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2004, 15, 3091.
2
1
former being the major product. The reaction rates are
extremely high, in comparison with previously reported systems.
Mechanistic studies to elucidate the nature of this transformation
are currently underway in our laboratory.
1
2 S. Kanemasa, T. Kanai, T. Araki and E. Wada, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1
999, 40, 5055.
3 M. M. Dıaz-Requejo and P. J. Pe
4 M. R. Fructos, T. R. Belderrain, P. de Fre
S. P. Nolan, M. M. Dıaz-Requejo and P. J. Pe
Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 5284.
5 M. R. Fructos, P. de Fre
and P. J. Perez, Organometallics, 2006, 25, 2237.
6 A. Prieto, M. R. Fructos, M. M. Dıaz-Requejo, P. J. Pe
P. Perez-Galan, N. Delpont and A. M. Echavarren, Tetrahedron,
009, 65, 1790.
1
1
´
´
rez, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 3379.
mont, N. M. Scott,
rez, Angew. Chem.,
´
We wish to thank DGI (CTQ2008-00042BQU), Junta de
´
´
´
Andalucıa (P07-FQM-02870) and Universidad de Huelva for
1
1
´
mont, S. P. Nolan, M. M. Dı
´
az-Requejo
rez,
funding.
´
´
´
´
´
Notes and references
2
w Experimental procedures. The complexes (NHC)AuCl and
17 (a) Z. Li, X. Ding and C. He, J. Org. Chem., 2006, 71, 5876;
(b) L. Ricard and F. Gagosz, Organometallics, 2007, 26, 4704;
(c) J. A. Flores and H. V. R. Dias, Inorg. Chem., 2008, 47, 4448.
18 P. de Fremont, N. M. Scott, E. D. Stevens and S. P. Nolan,
´
Organometallics, 2005, 24, 2411.
18,19
[
IPrAu(NCMe)]BF
4
were prepared according to literature
methods. EDA and benzaldehyde were purchased from Aldrich, and
employed without further purification. Solvents were dried prior to
use. NMR spectra were recorded using a Varian Mercury 400 MHz.
Catalysis procedure: in a Schlenk tube, under a dinitrogen atmosphere,
19 P. de Fre
´
mont, N. Marion and S. P. Nolan, J. Organomet. Chem.,
0.01 mmol of the catalyst was dissolved in 3 mL of CH
the desired amount of benzaldehyde. Ethyl diazoacetate was added
in one portion via microsyringe. Immediate evolution of gas was
2
Cl
2
along with
2009, 694, 551.
20 D. Michael, P. Mingos and J. Yau, J. Organomet. Chem., 1994,
479, C16–C17.
This journal is ꢀc The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
Chem. Commun., 2009, 5153–5155 | 5155