1534
T. Zhang et al. / Polymer 53 (2012) 1529e1534
Table 2
synthesized and characterized as deep blue light-emitting mate-
EL performance of the polymers based OLEDs.
rials. The introduction of the fluorinated groups in backbone
increased the fluorescent quantum yield and improved the spectra
purity and stability. However, 33 mol% of fluorinated units was
proved to be the most appropriate ratio leading to satisfied charge
mobility. This is one successful example to improve the blue color
purity of fluorene-type light-emitting polymers without expense of
luminescent quantum yield and charge mobility. A quantum effi-
ciency of 1.14% and CIE (0.16, 0.13) were obtained for PF-33F based
OLED, among the best performance reported for fluorene-based
blue light-emitting polymers so far.
b
b
Polymer Von
L (cd mꢁ2
)
hL (cd Aꢁ1
)
hext (%) b lmax
CIE (x, y)
a
(V)
(nm)
PFO
PF-33F
PF-50F
4.8
4
5.9
452 (14 V)
486 (8 V)
61 (12 V)
0.88 (6 V)
1.14 (5 V)
0.092 (7 V)
0.53
1.14
0.086
438
422
412
0.18, 0.21
0.16, 0.13
0.17, 0.13
The data in the parentheses are the voltages at which the data are recorded.
Turn-on voltage, recorded at 1 cd mꢁ2
Maximum values of the devices.
.
a
b
moieties but also by direct charge trapping in the EL device made of
PFO, while only by energy transfer in PL of PFO films. Evidently the
introduction of the fluorinated moieties in the backbone of these
two copolymers also guaranteed the color purity and stability of the
EL, which is usually more sensitive to the purity of light-emitting
material than PL. It is suggested that the improved spectral purity
and stability in both PL and EL of these blue light-emitting copoly-
mers benefit from the presence of p-difluorophenylene units which
probably take away electron density from the 9-position carbon
Acknowledgments
We thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(20923006, and 21072026), the Ministry of Education for the New
Century Excellent Talents in University (Grant NCET-08-0074), and
the NKBRSF (2009CB220009) for financial support of this work.
through
withdrawing nature.
p-conjugation channels due to its appropriate electron-
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The current densityevoltage (JeV) characteristics of these
OLEDs are illustrated in Fig. 5. In spite of the identical device
configuration in the three OLEDs, the PF-33F and PF-50F based
devices exhibited much higher current densities than PFO device. It
is implied that the introduction of p-difluorophenylene units in the
copolymer backbone is favorable to increase the charge conduc-
tivity of the resultant copolymers. However, when the content ratio
of the fluorinated units increased from 33% to 50%, the current
density at a given voltage decreased dramatically for PF-50F device
in comparison to PF-33F device. It is proposed that too high ratio of
p-difluorophenylene units probably act as electron traps and
induce unbalance of negative and positive charges.
Fig. 6 shows the luminanceevoltage curves for the three OLEDs.
All the EL performance data are summarized in Table 2. The PF-33F
device turned on (to deliver a brightness of 1 cd mꢁ2) at a relatively
lowvoltage of 4 V, and reached a maximumluminance of 486 cd mꢁ2
at 8 V. The luminance at a given voltage decreased dramatically for
PF-50F device in comparison with the PF-33F device despite the
slightly higher fluorescent quantum yield for PF-50F. This is
consistent with the current density trend observed in Fig. 5. A
maximum external quantum efficiency of 1.14% (corresponding to
aluminance efficiencyof1.14 cdAꢁ1) was achieved for PF-33Fdevice
at 5 V. Under same experimental conditions, the PFO device turned
on at a higher voltage of 4.8 V and the maximum external quantum
efficiency reached to 0.53% (0.88 cd Aꢁ1 at 6 V), which is comparable
with the reported data for PFO in literatures [11,24]. Evidently, the EL
performances of PF-33F are much better than the parent PFO with
improvedblue color purity, highercharge mobility, and much higher
EL efficiency. This should benefit from the presence of the p-
difluorophenylene units and its proper content ratio. In addition, the
EL efficiency and color coordinates of present copolymers are
evidently better than those of most polyfluorene derivatives re-
ported in the literature [11,13,15]. As far as we know, a quantum
efficiency of 1.14%, a luminescence efficiency of 1.14 cd Aꢁ1 and CIE
(0.16, 0.13) achieved for PF-33F device are among the best perfor-
mance reported for blue light-emitting polyfluorenes so far.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References
[1] Grimsdale AC, Chan K, Martin RE, Jokisz PG, Holmes AB. Chem Rev 2009;109:
897e1091.
[2] Pogantsch A, Wenzl FP, List EJW, Leising G, Grimsdale AC, Müllen K. Adv Mater
2002;14:1061e4.
[3] Xiao S, Nguyen M, Gong X, Cao Y, Wu H, Moses D, et al. Adv Funct Mater 2003;
13:25e9.
[4] Scherf U, List EJW. Adv Mater 2002;14:477e87.
[5] Teetsov JA, Vanden Bout DA. J Am Chem Soc 2001;123:3605e6.
[6] Montilla F, Mallavia R. Adv Funct Mater 2007;17:71e8.
[7] Romaner L, Pogantsch A, de Freitas PS, Scherf U, Zojer E, List EJW. Adv Funct
Mater 2003;13:597e601.
[8] Gong X, Iyer PK, Moses D, Bazan GC, Heeger AJ. Adv Funct Mater 2003;13:
325e30.
[9] Cho SY, Grimsdale AC, Jones DJ, Watkins SE, Holmes AB. J Am Chem Soc 2007;
129:11910e1.
[10] Craig MR, de Kok MM, Hofstraat JW, Schenning APHJ, Meijer EW. J Mater
Chem 2003;13:2861e2.
[11] Park SH, Jin YG, Kim JY, Kim SH, Kim JW, Suh HS, et al. Adv Funct Mater 2007;
17:3063e8.
[12] Hung MC, Liao JL, Chen SA, Chen SH, Su AC. J Am Chem Soc 2005;127:
14576e7.
[13] Li JY, Ziegler A, Wegner G. Chem Eur J 2005;11:4450e7.
[14] Charas A, Morgado J, Marinho JMG, Alcácer L, Lim SF, Friend RH, et al. Polymer
2003;44:1843e50.
[15] Kamtekar KT, Vaughan HL, Lyons BP, Monkman AP, Pandya SU, Bryce MR.
Macromolecules 2010;43:4481e8.
[16] Kameshima H, Nemoto N, Endo T. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 2001;39:
3143e50.
[17] Assaka AM, Rodrigues PC, de Oliverira ARM, Ding L, Hu B, Karasz FE, et al.
Polymer 2004;45:7071e81.
[18] Jo J, Chi CY, Höger S, Weger G, Yoon DY. Chem Eur J 2004;10:2681e8.
[19] Ye SH, Liu YQ, Lu K, Wu WP, Du CY, Liu Y, et al. Adv Funct Mater 2010;20:
3125e35.
[20] Ren HC, Li JY, Wang RJ, Zhang T, Gao ZX, Liu D. Polymer 2011;52:3639e46.
[21] Wang R, Liu D, Ren H, Zhang T, Yin H, Liu G, et al. Adv Mater 2011;23:2823e7.
[22] Tao S, Peng ZK, Zhang XH, Wang PF, Lee CS, Lee ST. Adv Funct Mater 2005;15:
1716e21.
[23] Zeng DL, Chen JW, Chen Z, Zhu WH, He J, Yu F, et al. Macromol Rapid Commun
2007;28:772e9.
[24] Yang W, Hou Q, Liu C, Niu Y, Huang J, Yang R, et al. J Mater Chem 2003;13:
1351e5.
[25] Zhang T, Liu D, Wang Q, Wang RJ, Ren HC, Li JY. J Mater Chem 2011;21:
12969e76.
4. Conclusion
[26] Yamamoto H, Wilkinson J, Long JP, Bussman K, Christodoulides JA, Kafafi ZH.
Nano Lett 2005;5:2485e8.
[27] Lupton JM. Chem Phys Lett 2002;365:366e8.
In summary, two fluorene-based copolymers containing p-
difluorophenylene units in backbone, PF-33F and PF-50F, were