Chemistry Letters 2002
195
Table 2. Opticalproperties of the po ly mers 6a-c and 1
Absorbance/nma Emission/nma,b
ing [2.2]paracyclophane and fluorene units in the main chain. The
photoluminescence spectra of the polymers showed a strong blue
light emission in solution and in the solid state, compared with the
fluorene-containing polymers reported so far. An appropriate
transannular ꢀ-ꢀ overlap of [2.2]paracyclophane in the polymer
backbone is important for efficient transfer of the electronic charge
or energy. The polymers obtained are promising candidates for
blue light-emitting materials with extreme photoluminescence and
electroluminescence.
Polymer
CHCl3
Film
CHCl3 (ÈF)
Film
6
6
6
1c
a
b
c
372
370
371
319, 384
370
368
371
312, 383
393, 412 (0.59)
393, 415 (0.58)
393, 415 (0.65)
411, 483 (0.30)
397, 424
397, 418
398, 428
523
2
a
Absorption and emission spectra were recorded in dilute CHCl3
solutions at room temperature. Excited at 370 nm (1:0 ꢃ 10ꢁ5 M).
b
c
Ref. 6.
References and Notes
absorption spectra of 6a-c in the CHCl3 solution at room
temperature were around 370 nm (Table 2). The absorption and
emission spectra of the polymer 6b, as a typicalrepresentative
example, are shown in Figure 1. The polymer 6b showed the
absorption peak at 370 nm (" ¼ 39200) and an onset at 418 nm,
which indicates the energy band gap as 2.98 eV. The peak of the
absorption spectra of the polymer films was almost the same as in
the solution. As shown in Figure 1, the polymer 6b exhibited strong
blue fluorescence with the peak maximum at 415 nm, (a shoulder
peak at 425 nm and a weak peak at 393 nm), which was blue-shifted
by 68 nm compared to those of the polymer 1 (Table 2). The
emission peak maximum was independent on the concentration of
the polymer solution, and in the film state the peak maximum at
1
2
For recent reviews, see: a) F. V o¨ gtle, in ‘‘Cyclophane Chemistry,’’
Wiley & Sons, New York (1993). b) J. Shultz and F. V o¨ gtle, Top. Curr.
Chem., 172, 42 (1994).
Bazan, Mukamel, and co-workers recently reported the unique
photophysicalproperties of a series of sti bl enoids having a [2.2]para-
cyclophane core: a) G. C. Bazan, W. J. Oldham, Jr., R. J. Lachicotte, S.
Tretiak, V. Chernyak, and S. Mukamel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 120, 9188
(1998). b) S. Wang, G. C. Bazan, S. Tretiak, and S. Mukamel, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 122, 1289 (2000). c) J. Zyss, I. Ledoux, S. Volkov, V.
Chernyak, S. Mukamel, G. P. Bartholomew, and G. C. Bazan, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 122, 11956 (2000).
3
a) R. A. Meyers, J. W. Hamersma, and H. E. Green, J. Polym. Sci.,
Polym. Lett. Ed., 10, 685 (1972). b) K. P. Sivaramakrishnan, C. Samyn,
I. J. Westerman, D. T. Wong, and C. S. Marvel, J. Polym. Sci., Polym.
Chem. Ed., 13, 1083 (1975). c) D. M. Chang and C. S. Marvel, J. Polym.
Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed., 13, 2507 (1975). d) S. Lin and C. S. Marvel, J.
Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed., 21, 1151 (1983).
4
18 nm was observed in a visible blue region. In contrast, in the case
of the polyfluorenes, variation of the emission color (peak maxima
at around 430 nm) is possible via the substitution pattern at 9-
position of the fluorene unit and/or via the change of a co-
monomer.9 In addition, Bunz and co-workers recently reported
the synthesis of poly(fluorenylene-ethynylen) by alkyne metathesis
and poly(9,9-didodecylfluorenylene-ethynylene) showed emission
4
5
a) J. Furukawa and J. Nishimura, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Lett. Ed., 14, 85
(1976). b) D. T. Longone and D. T. Glatzhofer, J. Polym. Sci., Polym.
Chem. Ed., 24, 1725 (1986). c) D. T. Longone and J. H. Glans, J. Polym.
Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed., 26, 405 (1988). d) S. Iwatsuki, T. Itoh, M. Kubo,
and H. Okuno, Polym. Bull., 32, 27 (1994).
S. Mizogami and S. Yoshimura, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1985,
1736.
Y. Morisaki and Y. Chujo, Macromolecules, in press.
R. D. McCullough, P. C. Ewbank, in ‘‘Handbook of Conducting
Polymers,’’ 2nd ed., ed. by T. A. Skotheim, R. L. Elsenbaumer, and
J. R. Reynolds, Marcel Dekker, New York (1997).
J. H. Burrousghes, D. D. C. Bradey, A. R. Brown, R. N. Marks, K.
Mackay, R. H. Friend, P. L. Burns, and A. Holmes, Nature, 347, 539
;10
1
4
6
7
peaks at 426 and 447 nm in CHCl3 solution. In comparison with
these reported fluorene–containing polymers, the titled compounds
6
a-c are one of the polymers, which show an emission peak at the
lowest wavelength. Furthermore, the fluorescence quantum yields
ÈF) of the polymers 6a-c were determined for highly diluted
CHCl3 solutions. 6a-c showed a quantum yield of around 0.60 using
8
9
1
(
(
1990).
First application of polyfluorene to EL diodes was reported in 1991: Y.
Ohmori, M. Uchida, K. Muro, and K. Yoshino, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 30
L1941 (1991).
Foe example, see: a) A. Charas, J. Morgado, J. M. G. Martinho, L.
Alc a´ cer, and F. Cacialli, Chem. Commun., 2001, 1216. b) D. Marsitzky,
R. Vestberg, P. Blainey, B. T. Tang, C. J. Hawker, and K. R. Carter, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 123, 6965 (2001) and references therein.
S. H. Lee, T. Nakamura, and T. Tsutsui, Org. Lett., 3, 2005 (2001).
a) H. A. Dieck and R. F. Heck, J. Organomet. Chem., 93, 259 (1975). b)
K. Sonogashira, Y. Tohda, and N. Hagihara, Tetrahedron Lett., 16, 4467
9
-anthracenecarboxylic acid in CH2Cl2 as a standard (ÈF ¼ 0:442).
In conclusion, we synthesized alternating copolymers combin-
0
(1)
(3)
1
1
1
2
(1975).
A typical procedureis as follows. A mixture of 4 (77 mg, 0.30 mmol), 5b
1
3
(
226 mg, 0.30 mmol), PdCl2(PPh3)2 (210 mg, 0.030 mmol), PPh3
157 mg, 0.060 mmol), CuI (76 mg, 0.040 mol), NEt3 (2.0 mL), and
(2)
(4)
(
THF (4.0 mL) was placed in a 50-mL Pyrex flask under nitrogen
atmosphere. The reaction was carried out at 50 C for 48 h with stirring.
ꢂ
After the reaction mixture was cooled, ammonium salt was filtered off
and washed with THF. The filtrate was concentrated and dried in vacuo.
The residue was dissolved in CHCl3 and poured into MeOH (50 mL)
twice to precipitate the polymer. The resulting polymer (6b) was
filtered, washed with MeOH, and dried in vacuo to give 169 mg
1
(
(
0.022 mmol, 76%). H NMR (270 MHz, CDCl3); ꢁ 0.69 (br, 4H), 0.85
br, 6H), 1.20 (m, 36H), 2.02 (br, 4H), 3.00 (m, 4H), 3.32 (br, 2H), 3.77
br, 2H), 6.58 (m, 2H), 6.69 (m, 2H), 7.09 (m, 2H), 7.38–7.77 (m, 6H);
250 300
400
500
600
700
(
Wavelength / nm
1
3
C NMR (67.5 MHz, CDCl3); ꢁ 14.1, 22.7, 23.8, 29.3, 29.6
Figure 1. UV-visible spectra of 6b (1) in CHCl3 solution and (2) in
the film state, and fluorescence emission spectra of 6b (3) in CHCl3
(overlapping signals), 30.1, 31.9, 34.2, 40.3, 55.3, 90.1, 93.7, 120.0,
122.4, 124.8, 130.0, 133.1, 134.5, 137.2, 139.6, 140.6, 142.1, 151.2.
14 N. G. Pschirer and U. H. F. Bunz, Macromolecules, 33, 3961 (2000).
ꢁ5
solution (1:0 ꢃ 10 M) and (4) in the film state, on the excitation at
70 nm.
3