Rickhaus et al.
JOCArticle
making it available for a broader scope of substrates and
facilitating its application. Herein, we describe studies on the
archetypical system in Figure 1 that have provided deeper
mechanistic insights and an optimized synthetic protocol.
Background
The cyclization of 1,10-binaphthyl (1) to perylene (2) by
alkali metals was discovered accidentally in 1967 by Solo-
dovnikov et al. during their attempts to record the ESR
spectrum of the 1,10-binaphthyl radical anion in solution.7,8
Because the work was published originally in Russian
and the later English translation is not cited by Chemical
Abstracts, the experimental data described therein, unfortu-
nately, have been mostly overlooked for the last 40 years; the
paper has been cited only three times. To rectify this situa-
tion, we summarize here some of the key findings that we
have gleaned from our own translation of the early Russian
paper; the summary in Chemical Abstracts is not entirely
accurate.
Solodovnikov et al. reduced 1,10-binaphthyl (1) in 1,2-
dimethoxyethane (0.1 M) with an excess of potassium metal
under vacuum at room temperature. The ESR signal for the
1,10-binaphthyl radical anion (1•-) grew in rapidly during the
first hour but then began to diminish slowly, disappearing
essentially completely over a period of 48 h. After 72 h, the
contents of the ampule were exposed to oxygen, and perylene
(2) was isolated in 39% yield. Some other hydrocarbon
products, detected by TLC and tentatively identified as
partially hydrogenated 1,10-binaphthyl, were also obtained,
but the amount of recovered 1,10-binaphthyl, if any, was not
specified. When the experiment was repeated and the reac-
tion mixture was filtered to remove the potassium metal after
1 h, the point at which the ESR signal had reached its maxi-
mum intensity, immediate exposure of the filtrate to oxygen
produced only a 0.3% yield of perylene (2). On the other
hand, allowing the filtrate to stand at room temperature for
72 h, after removal of the potassium at the 1 h point, pro-
duced a 10% yield of perylene (2). These results indicate that
the cyclization and rearomatization process is slow at room
temperature and that it does not require the continued pres-
ence of potassium metal, once the solution contains a
significant concentration of organic radical anions. The yield
of perylene after 72 h was lower, however, if the solution was
not left in contact with excess potassium after the first hour
(10% vs 39%).
Solodovnikov et al. also report the formation of hydrogen
gas in this reaction. They monitored the production of H2 by
GC analysis and the formation of perylene by UV-vis
spectroscopy. Figure 2 reproduces the graph they published
in 1968 that shows the percent yields of H2 gas and perylene
(2), as well as the growth and decline of the ESR signal, as a
function of time. It is noteworthy that (i) the amount of H2
detected was always significantly lower than the amount of
perylene and (ii) the formation of both products leveled off
with time; after 72 h, the yield of H2 reached 24.6%, whereas
the yield of perylene (2) reached 39%.
As the reaction proceeded, color changes were observed
that gave a crude indication of the dominant species present.
In the beginning, a green color developed that corresponded
to the radical anion of 1,10-binaphthyl (1•-); the radical
anion of naphthalene itself is also green. The solution then
FIGURE 1. Anionic cyclodehydrogenation of 1,10-binaphthyl (1)
to perylene (2) by alkali metals.
flash vacuum pyrolysis.6 Less well-known than all of these
methods, however, is the anionic cyclodehydrogenation of
aromatic hydrocarbons, for which the cyclization of 1,10-
binaphthyl (1) to perylene (2) by alkali metals serves as the
classic example (Figure 1).7,8
None of the other methods mentioned above convert 1,10-
binaphthyl (1) to perylene (2) very efficiently, if at all, and this
makes the anionic cyclodehydrogenation method unique,
complementary, and worthy of attention.9 Most intriguing is
the seemingly incongruous fact that the starting material (1 =
C20H14) is being oxidized (2 = C20H12), whereas the reagents
used to induce this oxidation are alkali metals, which arguably
qualify as some of the strongest reducing agents known. The
alkali metal is also being oxidized during the course of this
reaction, so what is being reduced? The inescapable conclusion
is that the two lost hydrogen atoms must end up reduced to a
lower oxidation state, either H2 or hydride.
Almost nothing is known about the mechanistic details of
this reaction.10,11 Even the stoichiometry is uncertain, so the
metal is generally just used in large excess. Because this
reaction is so poorly understood and the yields rarely exceed
50%,11 the method remains underutilized in synthesis. The
most prominent application is probably the syntheses of
€
12
rylenes by Mullen et al., in which potassium metal was
used to “zip up” specifically designed oligomers of 1,4-linked
naphthalenes. A knowledge of the mechanism operating, the
intermediates involved, and the optimum conditions to use
would allow chemists to tame this rather obstreperous reaction,
(6) (a) Clar, E. Polycyclic Hydrocarbons; Academic Press: New York,
1964. (b) Scott, L. T.; Bratcher, M. S.; Hagen, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
8743. (c) Hagen, S.; Bratcher, M. S.; Erickson, M. S.; Zimmermann, G.;
Scott, L. T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1997, 36, 406. (d) Scott, L. T.; Bronstein,
H. E.; Preda, D. V.; Ansems, R. B. M.; Bratcher, M. S.; Hagen, S. Pure Appl.
Chem. 1999, 71, 209. (e) Boorum, M. M.; Vasil’ev, Y. V.; Drewello, T.; Scott,
L. T. Science 2001, 294, 828. (f) Scott, L. T.; Boorum, M. M.; McMahon,
B. J.; Hagen, S.; Mack, J.; Blank, J.; Wegner, H.; de Meijere, A. Science 2002,
295, 1500. (g) Scott, L. T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4994.
(h) Tsefrikas, V. M.; Scott, L. T. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 4868. (i) Xue, X.;
Scott, L. T. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3937.
(7) (a) Solodovnikov, S. P.; Zaks, Y. B.; Ioffe, S. T.; Kabachnik, M. I.
Radiospektrosk. Kvantovokhim. Metody Strukt. Issled. 1967, 106; Chem.
Abstr. accession no. 1969:28235; CAN 70:28235. (b) Solodovnikov, S. P.;
Ioffe, S. T.; Zaks, Y. B.; Kabachnik, M. I. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Khim.
1968, 442; Chem. Abstr. accession no. 1968:476168; CAN 69:76168; English
translation Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, Div. Chem. Sci. 1968, 442.
(8) See also: Gilman, H.; Brannen, C. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1949, 71, 657.
(9) For related anionic cyclodehydrogenations, see: (a) Tamarkin, D.;
Benny, D.; Rabinovitz, M. Angew. Chem. 1984, 96, 594. (b) Tamarkin, D.;
Cohen, Y.; Rabinovitz, M. Synthesis 1987, 196. (c) Rabinovitz, M.; Tamarkin,
D. Synth. Met. 1988, 23, 487. (d) Deselets, D.; Kazmaier, P. M.; Burt, R. A.;
Hamer, G. K. Can. J. Chem. 1995, 73, 325. (e) Yao, J. H.; Chi, C.; Wu, J.; Loh,
K.-P. Chem.-Eur. J. 2009, 15, 9299.
(10) (a) Hnoosh, M. H.; Zingaro, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 4388.
(b) Eisenstein, O.; Mazaleyrat, J. P.; Tordeux, M.; Welvart, Z. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1977, 99, 2230.
(11) (a) Michel, P.; Moradpour, A. Synthesis 1988, 894. (b) Benshafrut,
€
R.; Hoffman, R. E.; Rabinovitz, M.; Mullen, K. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 644.
€
€
(12) (a) Bohnen, A.; Koch, K. H.; Luttke, W.; Mullen, K. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 1990, 29, 525. (b) Scherf, U.; Muellen, K. Synthesis 1992, 23.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 75, No. 21, 2010 7359