10.1002/anie.201704347
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
EXAFS (Table 1 and Table S6) of the regenerated sample also clearly
indicate the structural integrity of the active site in Zn/ZSM-5 after the
prolonged testing (see SI Sections 6, 7 and Figure S9). The structure and
ability for nucleophilic attack of Zn/ZSM-5 and Zn-containing enzymes
resemble to each other. Thus, this suggests that the immobilized
tetravalent Zn2+ with the terminal -OH is the common active site.
Raman spectroscopy was also employed to study the adsorbed structure
of GVL on Zn/ZSM-5. Figure 3b shows a much larger and broader peak
with Raman frequencies at the 1100-2240 cm-1 region which
encompasses -C=O of GVL at ca. 1600 cm-1 and symmetrical O-C-O at
[24]
1360 cm-1
upon GVL adsorption on Zn/ZSM-5. In addition, the
A1(TO) mode of Zn-O at 374 cm-1
is clearly visible upon the
[25]
adsorption of GVL on the terminal Zn-OH in Zn/ZSM-5.
In conclusion, using SXRD combined with Rietveld refinement, we
demonstrate for the first time an anchored Zn-OH structure in Zn/ZSM-
5 can adsorb GVL via a strong Lewis acid-base interaction. The
regenerative Zn-OH and a neighbour Brønsted acid site in H-ZSM-5 by
dissociative adsorption of water molecule work in a cooperative manner.
They provide new catalytically active sites for a cascade of reactions to
form aromatics via butene. The structure and mechanism for the
nucleophilic attack of the active Zn-OH site appears are comparable to
that of the reported CA II enzyme. Hence, it can be regarded as an
efficient ‘solid enzyme’ for this reaction. Thus, the immobilized Zn2+ for
catalytic hydrolysis may provide inspirations to the chemical industry on
how to harness biomass to produce useful products.
Keywords: Zn/ZSM-5 • gamma-valerolactone • decarboxylation • synchrotron X-
ray powder diffraction • Rietveld refinement
[1] M. R. Rahimpour, M. Jafari, D. Iranshahi, Appl. Energ. 2013, 109, 79-93.
[2] W. R. H. Wright, R. Palkovits, Chemsuschem 2012, 5, 1657-1667.
[3] D. M. Alonso, S. G. Wettstein, J. A. Dumesic, Green Chem. 2013, 15, 584-595.
[4] I. T. Horvath, H. Mehdi, V. Fabos, L. Boda, L. T. Mika, Green Chem. 2008, 10,
238-242.
[5] (a) A. L. Allred, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1961, 17, 215-221.
(b) J. Q. Bond, D. M. Alonso, D. Wang, R. M. West, J. A. Dumesic, Science
2010, 327, 1110-1114.
Figure 3. (a). 1H MAS NMR of fresh Zn/ZSM-5 at 30 oC, after vacuum pre-treatment at
300 oC for 8 h, experimental data (black line), simulated data (red dot) and the
corresponding simulated partial contributions (blue, green, violet, dark yellow and light
blue line). (b) Raman spectra of various samples. They show clearly a characteristic
large peak and wide broadening of Raman absorption frequencies near 1100-2240 cm-1
which encompasses -C=O of GVL at ca. 1600 cm-1 and symmetrical O-C-O at 1360 cm-
1 upon the GVL adsorption on Zn/ZSM-5. In addition, the A1 (TO) mode of Zn-O at 374
cm-1 is visible on the terminal Zn-OH in Zn/ZSM-5.
[6] H. Xia, J. Zhang, X. Yan, S. Xu, L. Yang, J. Fuel. Chem. Technol. 2015, 43, 575-
580.
[7] in Carbonic Anhydrase: Mechanism, Regulation, Links to Disease, and Industrial
Applications, Vol. 75 (Eds.: S. C. Frost, R. McKenna, S. C. Frost, R. McKenna),
2014.
[8] J. Brem, S. S. van Berkel, W. Aik, A. M. Rydzik, M. B. Avison, I. Pettinati, K.-D.
Umland, A. Kawamura, J. Spencer, T. D. W. Claridge, M. A. McDonough, C. J.
Schofield, Nature Chem. 2014, 6, 1084-1090.
However, they should not be taken for a direct like-for-like comparison
in mechanism. The initial step of nucleophilic attack of GVL by Zn-OH
during hydrolysis requires a bond cleavage with a higher activation
barrier than that of the dehydration/hydration of the more labile CO2 in
the enzymatic reaction without bond breakage. In addition, the Zn2+ is
immobilized by the ‘O’ ligands (Si-O-Si) of the rigid zeolite framework.
It is hence electronically and structurally different from those of the
flexible prosthetic hydrophobic protein chain in the case of Zn-
containing enzymes. We understand that even if this heterogeneous
catalyst contains sites that are geometrically akin to enzymes, the
reaction temperature, conditions, interactions with the framework,
adsorption and desorption processes still make this system significantly
different. Nevertheless, the tetrahedral structure of Zn-2 with a terminal
nucleophilic Zn-OH for the hydrolysis and its regeneration by a
neighbouring H+ acceptor site, which activate a water molecule in a
cooperative manner, is clearly comparable in both cases. It is also noted
that the nucleophilicity of M-OH over our tested catalysts also follows
the order of Zn > Ga > Sn. This trend can be rationalised by the order of
electronegativity: Zn(1.65) < Ga(1.81) < Sn(1.96). Hence, the electron
density of the ‘O’ of the M-OH group follows the trend: Zn-OH > Ga-
OH > Sn-OH.[5a] Since the regenerative formation of nucleophilic Zn-
OH by GVL and water in this enzyme-mimic Zn/ZSM-5 is an important
key feature, it is crucial to experimentally verify the existence of the Zn-
[9] D. N. Silverman, S. Lindskog, Acc. Chem. Res. 1988, 21, 30-36.
[10] D. H. Olson, G. T. Kokotailo, S. L. Lawton, W. M. Meier, J. Phys. Chem. 1981,
85, 2238-2243.
[11] C. P. Grey, F. I. Poshni, A. F. Gualtieri, P. Norby, J. C. Hanson, D. R. Corbin, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 1981-1989.
[12] R. E. Morris, S. J. Weigel, N. J. Henson, L. M. Bull, M. T. Janicke, B. F.
Chmelka, A. K. Cheetham, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 11849-11855.
[13] P. Norby, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 5215-5221.
[14] B. T. W. Lo, L. Ye, J. Qu, J. Sun, J. Zheng, D. Kong, C. A. Murray, C. C. Tang,
S. C. E. Tsang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1-5.
[15] L. Ye, B. T. W. Lo, J. Qu, I. Wilkinson, T. Hughes, C. A. Murray, C. C. Tang, S.
C. E. Tsang, Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 3422-3425.
[16] H. Kitagawa, Y. Sendoda, Y. Ono, J. Catal. 1986, 101, 12-18.
[17] G. Yang, Y. Wang, D. H. Zhou, X. C. Liu, X. W. Han, X. H. Bao, J. Mol. Catal.
A: Chem. 2005, 237, 36-44.
[18] A. N. Subbotin, G. M. Zhidomirov, I. R. Subbotina, V. B. Kazansky, Kinet. Catal.
2013, 54, 744-748.
[19] Y. F. Xue, A. Liljas, B. H. Jonsson, S. Lindskog, Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet.
1993, 17, 93-106.
[20] Z. Fisher, J. A. H. Prada, C. Tu, D. Duda, C. Yoshioka, H. Q. An, L.
Govindasamy, D. N. Silverman, R. McKenna, Biochemistry 2005, 44, 1097-1105.
[21] Y. Ono, H. Kitagawa, Y. Sendoda, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1987, 83, 2913-
2923.
[22] L. Heeribout, C. Doremieux-Morin, J. P. Nogier, R. Vincent, J. Fraissard,
Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 1998, 24, 101-112.
1
OH active site. Figure 3a shows five resolved H MAS NMR signals of
[23] J. F. Wu, S. M. Yu, W. D. Wang, Y. X. Fan, S. Bai, C. W. Zhang, Q. Gao, J.
Huang, W. Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 13567-13573.
[24] E. Garand, T. Wende, D. J. Goebbert, R. Bergmann, G. Meijer, D. M. Neumark,
K. R. Asmis, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 849-856.
the fresh Zn/ZSM-5 at 1.21, 1.88, 2.66, 4.15 and 5.61 ppm assigned to
Zn-OH, Si-OH, Al-OH, H+ of Brønsted acid site and the H of adsorbed
H2O on Brønsted acid site, respectively. The latter four signals have
been previously detected in various aluminosilicate-based zeolites[22] but
the former peak is reflected by the characteristic Zn-OH in Zn/ZSM-5[23]
[25] Y. Dong, C. Feng, P. Jiang, G. Wang, K. Li, H. Miao, Rsc Adv. 2014, 4, 7340-
7346.
.
4
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.