C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
together with the slight broadening of the spectra at lower
temperature suggest that the two types of folds coexist in solution.
Other folding modes cannot be strictly excluded. Fast equilibrium
on the NMR time scale is confirmed by the absence of diaste-
reotopic motifs in main chain and side chain methylenic signals
despite the chiral nature of the conformers. It might be speculated
that a subtle balance of P and Q monomers would favor one or the
other fold, or even allow for alternate patterns.
These results support the view that aliphatic-aromatic hybrid
oligomers often adopt unconventional conformations. Though
aliphatic moieties are reduced to methylene bridges in P2n and (PQ)n,
their effect on folding is dramatic. Such hybrids are likely to be
the object of increased scrutiny in the coming years.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by an ANR grant
(project no. NT05-3_44880) and the Ministry of research.
Supporting Information Available: Synthetic procedures, char-
acterization of new compounds, spectroscopic data, and complete ref
6a. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
References
Figure 2. (a) Stick and CPK representations of the crystal structure of
Boc(PQ)4OMe. Isobutyl chains and included solvent molecules have been
omitted for clarity. (b) Simplified schematic representation of a right-handed
herringbone helix showing two color-coded stacks of π-conjugated groups;
each group consists of a PQ dyad orthogonal to the previous and following
dyads in the sequence. Changes in the tilt angle of the strand with respect
to the axis are not depicted in this scheme (see Figure 1d). (c) Alternate
conformers resulting from 180° flips of the terminal PQ dyads. The structure
in (a) corresponds to form II.
(1) (a) Foldamers: Structure, Properties and Applications; Hecht, S. M., Huc,
I., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2007. (b) Goodman, C. M.;
Choi, S.; Shandler, S.; DeGrado, W. F. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007, 3, 252-
262.
(2) (a) Bru¨ggemann, J.; Bitter, S.; Mu¨ller, S.; Mu¨ller, W. M.; Mu¨ller, U.;
Maier, N. M.; Lindner, W.; Vo¨gtle, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46,
254-259. (b) Feigel, M.; Ladberg, R.; Engels, S.; Herbst-Hirmer, R.;
Fro¨hlich, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5698-5702.
(3) Hunter, C. A.; Spitaleri, A.; Tomas, S. Chem. Commun. 2005, 3691-
3693.
(4) (a) Gabriel, G. J.; Sorey, S.; Iverson, B. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
2637-2640. (b) Ghosh, S.; Ramakrishnan, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004,
43, 3264-3268. (c) Zhang, W.; Horoszewski, D.; Decatur, J.; Nuckolls,
C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4870-4873.
(5) (a) Hayen, A.; Schmitt, M. A.; Ngassa, F. N.; Thomasson, K. A.; Gellman,
S. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 505-510. (b) De Pol, S.; Zorn,
C.; Klein, C. D.; Zerbe, O.; Reiser, O. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43,
511-514. (c) Baldauf, C.; Gunther, R.; Hofmann, H.-J. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 71, 1200-1208. (d) Schmitt, M. A.; Choi, S. H.; Guzei, I. A.;
Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 4538-4539. (e) Sharma,
G. V. M.; Jadhav, V. B.; Ramakrishna, K. V. S.; Jayaprakash, P.;
Narsimulu, K.; Subash, V.; Kunwar, A. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
14657-14668. (f) Ananda, K.; Vasudev, P. G.; Sengupta, A.; Raja, K.
M. P.; Shamala, N.; Balaram, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16668-
16674.
(6) (a) Gong, B.; et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 11583-11588.
(b) Garric, J.; Le´ger, J.-M.; Huc, I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44,
1954-1958.
(7) (a) Raynal, N.; Averlant-Petit, M.-C.; Berge´, G.; Didierjean, C.; Marraud,
M.; Duru, D.; Martinez, J.; Amblard, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48,
1787-1790. (b) Baruah, P. K.; Sreedevi, N. K.; Gonnade, R.; Ravin-
dranathan, S.; Damodaran, K; Hofmann; H.-J.; Sanjayan, G. J. J. Org.
Chem. 2007, 72, 636-639.
(8) (a) Jiang, H.; Le´ger, J.-M.; Huc, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3448-
3449. (b) Jiang, H.; Le´ger, J.-M.; Dolain, C.; Guionneau, P.; Huc, I.
Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 8365-8374. (c) Dolain, C.; Gre´lard, A.; Laguerre,
M.; Jiang, H.; Maurizot, V.; Huc, I. Chem.sEur. J. 2005, 11, 6135-
6144.
(9) (a) Maurizot, V.; Dolain, C.; Leydet, Y.; Le´ger, J.-M.; Guionneau, P.;
Huc, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10049-10052. (b) Dolain, C.; Le´ger,
J.-M.; Delsuc, N.; Gornitzka, H.; Huc, I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
2005, 102, 16146-16151. (c) Delsuc, N.; Le´ger, J.-M.; Massip, S.; Huc.
I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 214-217.
(10) Zhang, A.; Ferguson, J. S.; Yamato, K.; Zheng, C.; Gong, B. Org. Lett.
2006, 8, 5117-5120.
Figure 3. NOE correlations compatible with a herringbone helix (solid
lines), with a canonical helix (dotted lines), and with both (dashed line).
i and i+2. The resulting structure is helical in that it possesses a
twist sense but does not fit the canonical definition of a helix: the
tilt angle with respect to the helix axis is not constant but changes
sign four times per turn at each pyridine methylene and carbonyl
group (Figure 1d). Thus, the overall aspect of the fold is that of
two stacks of aromatic rings perpendicular to each other, resembling
a herringbone motif. Modeling studies confirm that (i) such a pattern
can be propagated over long sequences (Figure 1d); (ii) terminal
PQ pairs can be flipped by 180° without disrupting the rest of the
structure (Figure 2c); and (iii) this 180° rotation cannot be
accommodated at PQ pairs within the sequence without perturbing
π-π stacking due to internal sterics.
NMR structure studies were carried out to assess whether the
structure found in the solid state also prevails in solution. Spectra
are slightly broad at 25 °C, broaden further upon cooling, and
sharpen upon heating. A full assignment of the spectra was possible
in toluene-d8 at 75 °C based on HMBC and HSQC experiments as
described previously.8c NOESY experiments allowed us to identify
seven strong NOE correlations between protons remote in the
sequence (Figure 3). Four of them are indeed compatible with the
herringbone fold observed in the solid state, or to alternate
herringbone helices where terminal PQ units may be flipped by
180°, but other correlations are incompatible and, on the contrary,
match with a canonical helical fold (Figure 1c). These results
(11) For examples, see: (a) Chapman, R. N.; Dimartino, G.; Arora, P. S. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12252-12253. (b) Nicoll, A. J.; Miller, D. J.;
Fu¨tterer, K.; Ravelli, R.; Allemann, R. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
9187-8193. (c) Schafmeister, C. E.; Po, J.; Verdine, G. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 5891-5892.
(12) Stone, M. T.; Heemstra, J. M.; Moore, J. S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39,
11-20.
(13) Ring closure may impose related conformations in macrocycles: Toyota,
S.; Goichi, M.; Kotani, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2248-2251.
JA074285S
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 37, 2007 11349