220
X. Su et al. / Polyhedron 169 (2019) 219–227
obtained. 1H NMR (500 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl3): major isomer A
2. Experimental
2.1. General considerations
(ꢁ90%): d 5.48 (s, 2H, CHCO), 4.06 (m, 1H, NCHH), 3.96 (m, 1H,
NCHH), 2.16 (s, 6H, COCH3), 2.10 (s, 6H, CH3CN), 1.35 (t, 6H, NCH2-
CH3, J = 7.1 Hz). Isomer B (ꢁ10 %, partial spectrum): d 5.42 (s, 2H,
CHCO), 4.26 (m, 1H, NCHH), 2.18 (s, 3H, COCH3), 2.10 (s, 3H, CH3-
CN), 1.31 (t, 6H, NCH2CH3, J = 7.2 Hz). 13C{1H} (500 MHz, 25 °C,
CDCl3) major isomer A: d 181.74 (CO), 171.93 (CN), 107.04 (CHCN),
52.24 (NCH2CH3), 25.66 (COCH3), 21.82 (CNCH3), 13.69 (NCH2CH3).
MS (ESI) m/z Calc. for WO4C12H21N2 [M+H]+: 469.1321. Found:
Methylene chloride, hexane and toluene (Fisher Scientific) were
purified using an MBraun MB-SP solvent purification system and
stored over activated 3 Å molecular sieves. Diethyl ether and
tetrahydrofuran were dried using sodium/benzophenone, distilled,
and stored over activated 3 Å molecular sieves before use. Hexam-
ethyldisiloxane, methanol, chloroform-d1 (Cambridge Isotopes)
and benzene-d6 (Cambridge Isotopes) were stored over 4 Å molec-
ular sieves. Triethylamine was distilled over potassium hydroxide
and stored over 4 Å molecular sieves. The compounds WOCl4
[19], WO2Cl2(dme) [20], acNacH [21], acNacMeH [22] and acNacEtH
[23] were synthesized according to literature procedures. All other
solvents and reagents were of analytical grade and were used as
received. NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian INOVA 500 spec-
trometer using residual protons from deuterated solvents for refer-
ence. Thermogravimetric analysis was run using a TA Q5000 under
nitrogen at a temperature scan rate of 10 °C/min to 600 °C. Mass
spectrometry was performed on an Agilent Technologies 6210
Time of Flight instrument using direct analysis in real time. Ele-
mental analyses were performed by Robertson Microlit Laborato-
ries (Ledgewood, NJ).
469.1323. FTIR (solid sample): 929 cmÀ1 (W@O,
886 cmÀ1 (W@O,
(asym)).
m(sym)),
m
2.3. Film deposition and characterization
Deposition of WOx was carried out using a custom-built, verti-
cal cold-wall impinging-jet AACVD reactor [24]. Silicon substrates
with native silicon dioxide (Si/SiO2, n-type, (100)) were cleaned
in boiling acetone, methanol and deionized water for 3 min each,
and then placed on a SiC covered graphite susceptor in the reaction
chamber under vacuum. A 0.025 M solution of 2 in diglyme was
prepared and transferred into a 10 mL gastight Hamilton syringe.
The precursor solution was introduced into a nebulizer with a
quartz plate vibrating at 1.44 MHz by a syringe pump with an
injection rate of 4 mL hÀ1. The generated aerosol was delivered to
the reaction chamber with nitrogen (1000 sccm, 99.999% purity,
Airgas) carrier gas. During deposition (150 min), the reactor pres-
sure was maintained at 350 Torr and the growth temperature
was controlled by a radio frequency (RF) heating system on the
susceptor.
2.2. Synthesis
2.2.1. WO2{HC[MeC(O)][MeC(NH)]}2 (1)
In the glovebox, 1.01 g (2.68 mmol) WO2Cl2(dme) was sus-
pended in 40 mL THF in a Schlenk flask. Then NEt3 (1.80 mL,
5 eq.) was mixed with 0.532 g (5.37 mmol) acNacH, and 10 mL
THF, which was transferred to an addition funnel. The funnel was
attached to the Schlenk flask and transferred to the Schlenk line.
The WO2Cl2(dme)/THF mixture was cooled in a dry ice/acetone
bath. The ligand/NEt3 solution was added to the flask dropwise.
The resulting mixture was then left to warm to room temperature
and stir for 12 h. Volatiles were removed under vacuum and the
flask was transferred to the glovebox. The product was extracted
with THF and filtered through Celite giving a yellow solution. The
solvent was removed in vacuo. The crude product was washed with
hexane. Yellow solid (0.41 g, 37%) was obtained. 1H NMR
(500 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl3): d 7.62 (b, 2H, NH), 5.35 (s, 2H, CHCO),
2.15 (s, 6H, COCH3), 2.05 (s, 6H, CH3CN). 13C{1H} (500 MHz, 25 °C,
CDCl3): d 185.24 (CO), 172.47 (CN), 102.29 (CHCN), 27.03 (COCH3),
25.86 (CNCH3). MS (ESI) m/z Calc. for WO4C10H18N2 [M+H]+:
413.0694. Found: 413.0765. FTIR (solid sample): 933 cmÀ1
Elemental compositions of the deposits were determined using
ULVAC-PHI XPS Al Ka radiation. O 1s (530.5 eV) or adventitious C
1s (284.8 eV) was used as an internal standard [13,25]. The XPS
spectra of the W 4f core level were deconvoluted with parameters
of spin–orbit separation
DEP (4f5/2–4f7/2) = 2.18 eV and the W 4f5/2-
to-W 4f7/2 peak ratio = 3:4. The crystallinities and morphologies
were measured using field emission scanning electron microscopy
(FESEM, FEI Nova NanoSEM 430) and X-ray diffraction (XRD, Pan-
alytical X’pert Pro).
2.4. Crystallographic structure determination of 2
X-ray Intensity data were collected at 100 K on a Bruker DUO
diffractometer using Mo K
a radiation (k = 0.71073 Å) and an
APEXII CCD area detector. Raw data frames were read by the pro-
1
gram SAINT and integrated using 3D profiling algorithms. The
resulting data were reduced to produce hkl reflections and their
intensities and estimated standard deviations. The data were cor-
rected for Lorentz and polarization effects and numerical absorp-
tion corrections were applied based on indexed and measured
faces.
(W@O, m m(asym)).
(sym)), 892 cmÀ1 (W@O,
2.2.2. WO2{HC[MeC(O)][MeC(NMe)]}2 (2)
Compound 2 was synthesized following the same procedure as
used for 1. Starting with 1.00 g (2.65 mmol) WO2Cl2(dme) and
0.613 g (5.42 mmol) acNacMeH, yellow solid (0.82 g, 70%) was
obtained. 1H NMR (500 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl3): d 5.52 (s, 2H, CHCO),
3.64 (s, 6H, NCH3), 2.11 (s, 6H, COCH3), 2.11 (s, 6H, CH3CN). 13C
{1H} (500 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl3): d 182.27 (CO), 173.06 (CN), 106.90
(CHCN), 45.57 (NCH3), 25.68 (COCH3), 22.78 (CNCH3). MS (ESI) m/
z Calcd for WO4C12H21N2 [M+H]+: 441.1007. Found: 441.1024.
Anal. Calc. for WO4C12H20N2: C, 32.75; H, 4.58; N, 6.36. Found: C,
The structure was solved and refined in SHELXTL2014 [26], using
full-matrix least-squares refinement. The non-H atoms were
refined with anisotropic thermal parameters and all of the H atoms
were calculated in idealized positions and refined riding on their
parent atoms. In the final cycle of refinement, 3477 reflections
(of which 3371 are observed with I > 2r(I)) were used to refine
178 parameters and the resulting R1, wR2 and S (goodness of fit)
were 0.95%, 2.29% and 1.073, respectively. The refinement was car-
ried out by minimizing the wR2 function using F2 rather than F val-
ues. R1 is calculated to provide a reference to the conventional R
value but its function is not minimized.
32.46; H, 4.63; N, 6.13%. FTIR (solid sample): 929 cmÀ1 (W@O,
(sym)), 889 cmÀ1 (W@O,
(asym)).
m
m
2.2.3. WO2{HC[MeC(O)][MeC(NEt)]}2 (3)
2.5. Thermolysis studies
Compound 3 was synthesized following the same procedure as
used for 1. Starting with 0.497 g (1.32 mmol) WO2Cl2(dme) and
0.338 g (2.65 mmol) acNacEtH, yellow solid (0.16 g, 24%) was
The sample (complex 2 or the protonated free ligand acNacMeH)
was placed in a 10 mL headspace vial which was heated in the GC