C O MMU N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Enantioselective Hydrogenation of Olefin Derivatives
and high density of the catalytically active units, as well as
comparable performance to that of the free catalysts in terms of
both activity and enantioselectivity.
a
3a-d under the catalysis of 2a-c
In conclusion, we have demonstrated a self-supported strategy
in the generation of heterogeneous enantioselective catalyst through
assembly of bridged monophosphoramidite chiral ligand with Rh-
(I) ion for asymmetric hydrogenation of olefin derivatives, affording
a variety of enantioenriched amino acid and amine derivatives with
high yields and enantioselectivities. This strategy might provide a
new direction in asymmetric catalysis, particularly for the develop-
ment of practical heterogeneous asymmetric synthesis of optically
active compounds.
entry
catalyst
substrate
ee (%)b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2a
2a
2a
2a
2b
2b
2b
2b
2c
2c
2c
2c
3a
3b
3c
3d
3a
3b
3c
3d
3a
3b
3c
3d
95.8
95.7
96.6
97.3
94.3
94.9
94.7
96.8
95.0
95.9
96.2
95.9
Acknowledgment. Financial support from the NNSFC, CAS,
and the Major Basic Research Development Program of China
Grant G2000077506) and the Ministry of Science and Technology
of Commission of Shanghai Municipality is gratefully acknowl-
edged. This paper is dedicated to Professor Li-Xin Dai on the
occasion of his 80th birthday.
(
1
1
1
0
1
2
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
figures of SEM and PXD images of catalysts and chiral HPLC or CG
analysis of the products (PDF). This material is available free of charge
via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
a
All of the reactions were carried out at 25 °C under 40 atm pressure of
H2 at a substrate concentration of 0.2 M for 10 h (substrate/catalyst ) 100:
1
1
). The conversion of the substrates determined by H NMR was >99%.
References
b
Determined by HPLC on a Chiralcel AD column and GC on a Supelco
BETA-DEX120 or GAMMA-DEX 225 column.
(1) (a) Noyori, R. Asymmetric Catalysis in Organic Synthesis; Wiley-
Interscience: New York, 1994. (b) Jacobsen, E. N., Pfaltz, A., Yamamoto,
H., Eds. In ComprehensiVe Asymmetric Catalysis; Springer: Berlin, 1999;
Vols. I-III. (c) Yamamoto, H., Ed. In Lewis Acids in Organic Synthesis;
Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2001.
Table 2. Recycling and Reuse of the Self-Supported Catalysts 2c
a
in Enantioselective Hydrogenation of 3a
run
conversion (%)
ee (%)
(2) (a) de Vos, D. E., Vankelecom, I. F. J., Jacobs, P. A., Eds. In Chiral
Catalyst Immobilization and Recycling; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2000.
For recent reviews, see: (b) Song, C. E.; Lee, S.; Chem. ReV. 2002, 102,
3495-3524. (c) Fan, Q.; Li, Y.-M.; Chan, A. S. C. Chem. ReV. 2002,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
95.0
93.5
90.2
90.9
90.5
90.0
89.5
102, 3385-3466. (d) de Vos, D. E.; Dams, M.; Sels, B. F. Jacobs, P. A.
Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 36153640. (e) Leadbeater, N. E.; Marco, M. Chem.
ReV. 2002, 102, 3217-3274. (f) Bergbreiter, D. E. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102,
3
345-3384. (g) Pu, L. Chem. ReV. 1998, 98, 2405-2494.
(3) (a) Yaghi, O. M.; O’Keeffe, M.; Ockwig, N. W.; Chae, H. K.; Eddaoudi,
M.; Kim, J. Nature 2003, 423, 705-714. (b) Leininger, S.; Olenyuk, B.;
Stang, P. J. Chem ReV. 2000, 100, 853-908.
(
4) (a) Sawaki, T.; Dewa, T.; Aoyama, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
a
All of the reactions were carried out under the experimental conditions
of entry 9 in Table 1.
8
4
539-8540. (b) Sawaki, T.; Aoyama, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,
793-4798.
(
5) For the concept of self-supported achiral heterogeneous catalysts, see:
(
a) Bianchini, C.; Farnetti, E.; Graziani, M.; Kaspar, J.; Vizza, F. J. Am.
indicated that no detectable rhodium leached into the organic
solution and the concentrations of phosphor in organic phase were
less than 3 ppm for each round of hydrogenation, which further
confirmed the heterogeneous nature of the present systems.
Recycling of the present self-supported catalyst was quite simple.
After the completion of the hydrogenation, simple filtration under
an Ar atmosphere afforded the separation of the solid-state catalyst
and products in solution. The separated solids were charged with
solvent and substrates again for the next run. The reusability of
the present self-supported catalyst system was examined in the
hydrogenation of 3a with catalyst 2c. As shown in Table 2, in the
second and third runs, the enantioselectivities of the reaction
dropped slightly (from 95 to 93.5 and 90.2%, respectively). On
the other hand, the ee of the product from the third run to the
seventh run remains almost constant (90.9-89.5%). We did not
observed significant deterioration of activity in the recovered
catalyst even after seven times of use. Therefore, such chiral metal-
organic polymeric assemblies have the advantages not only of
heterogeneous catalysts such as easy recovery and convenient
recycle but also of facile preparation, robust chiral frameworks,
Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 1753-1759. (b) Dorta, R.; Shimon, L.; Milstein,
D. J. Organomet. Chem. 2004, 689, 751-758.
(
6) Homochiral metal-organic porous material for enantioselective catalysis
(<8% ee); see: (a) Seo, J. S.; Whang, D.; Lee, H.; Jun, S. I.; Oh, J.;
Jeon, Y. J.; Kim, K. Nature 2000, 404, 982-986. For metal-bridged
polymers in heterogeneous catalysis of enantioselective Michael addition
and carbonyl-ene reactions, see: (b) Takizawa, S.; Somei, H.; Jayaprakash,
D.; Sasai, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5711-5714. (c) Guo, H.;
Wang, X.; Ding, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 2009-2012.
(7) For heterogenization of Noyori’s catalysts, see: (a) Hu, A.; Ngo, H. L.;
Lin, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11490-11491. (b) Hu, A.; Ngo,
H. L.; Lin, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 6000-6003.
8) For leading references, see: (a) Van den Berg, M.; Minnaard, A. J.;
Schudde, E. P.; Van Esch, J.; de Vries, A. H. M.; de Vries, J. G.; Feringa,
B. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 11539-11540. (b) Pena, D.; Minnaard,
A. J.; de Vries, J. G.; Feringa, B. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14552-
14553.
(
(
9) For recent reviews, see: (a) Blaser, H.-U.; Malan, C.; Pugin, B.; Spindler,
F.; Steiner, H.; Studer, M. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2003, 354, 103-151. (b)
Okuma, T.; Kitamura, M.; Noyori, R. In Catalysis Asymmetric Synthesis;
Ojima, I., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2000; pp 1-110. (c) Tang, W.;
Zhang, X. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 3029-3070.
(10) (a) Jia, X.; Guo, R.; Li, X.; Yao, X.; Chan, A. S. C. Tetrahedron Lett.
2
002, 43, 5541-5544. (b) Reactions using MonoPhos/Rh homogeneous
catalyst under the experimental conditions shown in Table 1 afforded 4d
in >99% conversion with 87.8 and 88.8% ees for two parallel experiments,
respectively.
JA047372I
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 126, NO. 34, 2004 10525