2-Ethyl-3-methylmaleimide in Tokyo Bay Sediments
1845
the issue of the conditions and timing of the oxida-
tion of tetrapyrrole pigments, because ancient sedi-
ments do not provide such oxidative conditions. In
this study, on the assumption that the maleimide is
formed in photic or oxygenic environments and
preserved in the sediments, we undertook a search
for maleimides in the sediments of Tokyo Bay, the
depositional environment of which is apparently ox-
idative.
Materials and Methods
General procedure for analysis of maleimide in
Tokyo Bay sediments. The Tokyo Bay bottom sedi-
ments that we analyzed were portions of a 100-cm
core collected at about 5 km o‹ng from the in‰ux of
the Tama River in 1986. The core was cut every
2.5 cm from the surface to 30 cm in depth and every
5.0 cm from 30 to 100 cm in depth. These layers were
lyophilized, pulverized, and kept in a freezer until
analysis. The samples (0.4 g) were extracted by soni-
Fig. 1. Total Ion Chromatogram (a) and Mass Fragmentogram
(b) of an Extract of Tokyo Bay Sediment and Total Ion Chro-
matogram of Authentic 2-Ethyl-3-methylmaleimide (c).
maleimide (1). Diethyl 2-ethyl-3-methylmaleate was
prepared by a similar method to that reported for the
stereoselective synthesis of diethyl 2-butyl-3-
methylmaleate,9) from diethyl 1-ethoxycarbonyl-
propane-1-phosphonate and ethyl pyruvate as a
cation with n-hexane, a 7:3 mixture of n-hexane and
CH2Cl2, CH2Cl2, a 4:1 mixture of CH2Cl2-methanol
and methanol (2 ml each) 6 times each, and each ex-
tract was put of a silica gel column (175
with -hexane, CH2Cl2, CH2Cl2-acetone (9:1), and
methanol (12 ml each) as eluents. The eluent was con-
centrated to 50 l under a stream of nitrogen. One
l solution was analyzed by GC-
×
10 mm i.d.)
colorless oil in the yield of 56
z
. 1H-NMR (CDCl3)
d
:
=
=
n
1.08 (3H, t,
J
J
7.5 Hz, 2-CH2CH3), 1.30, 1.32 (total
6.5 Hz, OCH2CH3), 1.96 (3H, s,
×
6H, t 2,
m
3-CH3), 2.38 (2H, q,
J
=
7.5 Hz, 2-CH2CH3), 4.20,
=
6.5 Hz, OCH2CH3).
×
4.22 (total 4H, q 2, J
microliter of a 50-
m
MS.
The maleate thus obtained (2.1 g, 10 mmol) in
ethanol (5 ml) was treated with 2 NaOH (5 ml) at
40 C for 3 h. The solution was acidiˆed with 2 HCl
at 0 C and extracted with ether. The extract was con-
centrated and the residual oil was reacted with urea
(2.0 g) at 100 C for 1 h. The resulting solid was ex-
For analysis of dihydrohematinic acid (3) or
hematinic acid (4), the fraction obtained from 1 g of
surface sediment was concentrated to dryness and
M
9
M
9
treated with 15
z BF3-methanol (1 ml) at 809C for
20 min. The reaction mixture was then concentrated
to dryness, dissolved in CH2Cl2, and analyzed by
GC-MS.
9
tracted with chloroform and the extract was puriˆed
by silica gel column chromatography with benzene-
ethyl acetate as the eluent to give the desired
The samples were analyzed with a Hewlett Packard
G1800A GCD system. The GC was equipped with an
maleimide (1) as needles (0.59 g, 43
z
), mp 67–8
: 1.15 (3H, t,
7.6 Hz, 2-CH2CH3), 1.98 (3H, s, 3-CH3), 2.42 (2H,
9C
1
FFAP bonded FS-WCOT capillary column (60 m
0.25 mm i.d.). The oven temperature was pro-
grammed to give 50 C for 2 min, to increase from
50 C to 150 C at the rate of 10
C min„1, then from
150 C to 230 C at the rate of 3
C min„1, and to hold
×
(lit. 68
9
C). H-NMR (CDCl3)
d
J
=
=
7.6 Hz, 2-CH2CH3), 8.30 (1H, broad s, NH).
9
q,
J
9
9
9
z
Anal. Found: C, 60.46; H, 6.55; N, 9.97 . Calcd.
9
9
9
for C7H9O2N: C, 60.42; H, 6.52; N, 10.07z.
at the ˆnal temperature for 50 min. Helium was used
as a carrier gas with a ‰ow rate of 1 ml min„1. Elec-
tron impact (70 eV) mass spectra were obtained by
Results and Discussion
scanning from m z 45 to 425 every 0.5 s.
Each of 16 samples of the divided core was extract-
ed successively by sonication with -hexane,
hexane-CH2Cl2 (7:3), CH2Cl2, CH2Cl2-methanol
(4:1), and methanol. The extracts were each separat-
ed by silica gel column chromatography, each frac-
tion being analyzed by GC-MS.
2-Ethyl-3-methylmaleimide (1) was detected in the
CH2Cl2-acetone fractions of the CH2Cl2-methanol
extracts of all the samples analyzed. Typical GC-MS
data of the extract are shown in Figs. 1 and 2,
together with those of an authentic sample, which
W
Identiˆcation of 2-ethyl-3-methylmaleimide was
made by comparison of the retention time on the GC
and of the MS fragment patterns with those of the
standard compound, which was synthesized through
a new easier path as stated below. The abundance of
maleimide was estimated by comparison of the peak
area on a mass fragmentogram of molecular ion to
that of the standard compound.
n
n-
Preparation of authentic 2-ethyl-3-methyl-