8
40
Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Vol. 63, No. 10 (2015)
All the other compounds were inactive (IC >30µM) in all the (flow rate; 2mL/min, 50% MeOH) to yield compound 8
5
0
cell lines.
(4mg). Fraction PNM5 was separated with Sephadex LH-20
with 100% MeOH to yield 7 fractions (PNM51–57). Fraction
PNM51 was separated by the purification of semi-preparative
Experimental
General Experimental Procedures Optical rotations reverse-phase HPLC using 50% MeOH to furnish compound
were measured on a Jasco P-1020 polarimeter (Jasco, Easton, 16 (4mg). Fraction PNM52 was applied to C18 Waters Sep-
MD, U.S.A.). IR spectra were recorded on a Bruker IFS-66/S Pak Vac 6 cc with 40% MeOH and purified by preparative
FT-IR spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany). ESI and reverse-phase HPLC using 38% MeOH to yield compounds
HR-ESI mass spectra were recorded on a SI-2/LCQ DecaXP 7 (4mg) and 11 (4mg). Fraction PNM53 was separated by
Liquid chromatography (LC)-mass spectrometer (Thermo chromatography on LiChroprep Lobar-A RP-18 column with
Scientific, West Palm Beach, PL, U.S.A.). NMR spectra were 40% MeOH to give five subfractions (PNM531–535). From
recorded on a Varian UNITY INOVA 500 NMR spectrometer those subfractions, subtraction PNM532 was further purified
1
(
Varian, Palo Alto, CA, U.S.A.) operating at 500MHz ( H) by semi-preparative reverse-phase HPLC (flow rate; 2mL/min,
13
and 125MHz ( C), with chemical shifts given in ppm (δ). 25% MeOH) to yield compounds 9 (7mg) and 10 (6mg). Sub-
Preparative HPLC used a Gilson 306 pump (Gilson, Middle- fraction PNM533 was further purified by semi-preparative
ton, WI, U.S.A.) with a Shodex refractive index detector reverse-phase HPLC (flow rate; 2mL/min, 40% MeOH) to
(Shodex, New York, NY, U.S.A.). Low-pressure liquid chro- obtain compounds 14 (12mg) and 15 (19mg). Fraction PNM1
matography (LPLC) was carried out over a LiChroprep Lobar- and PNM2 were consolidated and separated by RP-C18 silica
A Si 60 column (240mm ×10 mm i.d.; Merck, Darmstadt, gel column chromatography with MeOH to H O gradient in-
2
Germany) with a FMI QSY-0 pump (Teledyne Isco, Lincoln, creasing from 80 to 100% to give three fractions (PNM21–23).
NE, U.S.A.). Column chromatography was performed with a Fraction PNM21 was subjected to fractionation with C18 Wa-
silica gel 60 (Merck, 230–400 mesh). The packing material ters Sep-Pak Vac 6 cc with 100% MeOH to yield subfractions
for molecular sieve column chromatography was Sephadex PNM211 and PNM212. Subfraction PNM211 was purified by
LH-20 (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). Merck precoated silica preparative reverse-phase HPLC with a solvent system of 45%
gel F254 plates and reversed-phase (RP)-18F254s plates (Merck, MeOH (flow rate; 2mL/min) to give compounds 12 (4mg) and
Darmstadt, Germany) were used for thin-layer chromatogra- 13 (4mg).
phy (TLC). Spots were detected on TLC under UV light or by
heating after spraying with anisaldehyde–sulfuric acid.
Orobol 4′-O-β-D-apiofuranosyl-(1→6)-β-D-glucopyranoside
25
(1): Yellowish gum; [α] +20.6 (c=0.30, MeOH); UV (MeOH)
D
Plant Materials The trunk of T. amurensis was collected λmax (logε) 288 (1.2), 258 (1.9), 218 (3.8) nm; IR (KBr)
from Hwacheon-Myun, Hongcheon city, Gangwon-do, Korea, νmax 3354, 2946, 2832, 1656, 1508, 1450, 1365, 1177, 1055,
−
1
1
13
in March 2010. Samples of plant material were identified by 998cm ; H- (500MHz) and C- (125MHz) NMR data, see
+
one of the authors (K. R. Lee). A voucher specimen (SKKU Table 1; ESI-MS (positive-ion mode) m/z: 603 [M+Na] . HR-
+
2
010–03) was deposited in the herbarium of the School of ESI-MS (positive-ion mode) m/z: 603.1323 [M+Na] (calcd for
Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea.
C H O Na, 603.1326).
26 28 15
Extraction and Isolation The air-dried T. amurensis
Acid Hydrolysis of 1 and Sugar Analysis Compound 1
trunks (4kg) were extracted twice with 80% aqueous MeOH (2mg) was hydrolyzed by 1N HCl (dioxane–H O, 1:1, 5mL)
2
(
2×4h) under reflux. The extract was filtered and then concen- under reflux conditions for 3h. After cooling, the reaction
trated under vacuum to afford a crude MeOH extract (360g). mixture was diluted with H O and extracted with CHCl .
2
3
The extract was then partitioned with n-hexane, CHCl3, A sample of the aqueous layer was neutralized by passage
EtOAc, and n-BuOH to yield 11.8, 38.5, 10.2, and 72.5g of through an Amberlite IRA-67 column and repeatedly evapo-
residues, respectively. Each fraction was evaluated for its anti- rated under reduced pressure to give the sugar fraction. The
neuroinflammatory effect in an activated murine microglial sugars in the fraction were analyzed by silica gel TLC by
cell line. Among the four fractions, the EtOAc-soluble frac- comparison with authentic samples. The solvent system was
tion showed the most significant activity (Table 2). Thus, the CHCl –MeOH–H O (8:5:1). Spots were visualized by spray-
3
2
EtOAc-soluble fraction was separated with silica gel column ing with 95% EtOH–H SO –anisaldehyde (9:0.5:0.5), then
2
4
chromatography using a gradient of MeOH to CHCl from heated at 120°C for 3min. The Rf of glucose and apiose were
3
10 to 50% and this yielded 9 fractions (PNM1–9). Fraction 0.30 and 0.45, respectively for sugars of 1. For GC analysis,
PNM7 was subjected to Sephadex LH-20 with 100% MeOH each sugar fraction was dissolved in anhydrous pyridine
to give 8 fractions (PNM71–78). Fraction PNM76 and PNM77 (100 µL), and 0.1M L-cysteine methyl ester hydrochloride in
16,17)
was consolidated and subjected to fractionation with silica anhydrous pyridine (200µL) was added.
The mixture was
gel column chromatography (CHCl –MeOH–H O, 9:3:0.5) stirred at 60°C for 1h. Then 150µL of HMDS/TMCS (hexa-
3
2
to yield 4 subfractions (PNM771–774). Subfraction PNM772 methyldisilazane–trimethychlorosilane–pyridine, 3:1:10) was
was further purified by semi-preparative reverse-phase HPLC added, and the mixture was stirred at 60°C for another 30min.
(flow rate; 2mL/min, 55% MeOH) to give compounds 1 (6mg) The precipitate was centrifuged off, and the supernatant was
and 4 (3mg). Subfraction PNM773 was further purified by concentrated under an N stream. The residue was partitioned
2
semi-preparative reverse-phase HPLC (flow rate; 2mL/min, between n-hexane and H O (0.1mL each), and the hexane
2
35% MeOH) to give compounds 2 (12mg), 3 (10mg), and 17 layer (1µL) was analyzed by GC experiment. D-Glucose and
(
5mg). Fraction PNM73 was also purified by semi-preparative D-apiose were detected by co-injection of the hydrolysate with
reverse-phase HPLC (flow rate; 2mL/min, 45% MeOH) to standard silylated samples (D-glucose: 11.38min; L-glucose:
yield compounds 5 (9mg) and 6 (9mg). Fraction PNM72 was 12.62min; D-apiose: 5.08; L-apiose: 5.65). The retention
further purified by semi-preparative reverse-phase HPLC times of sugars obtained by acid hydrolysis were D-glucose