10316
fluorescence intensity (Fig. 1B, curve ‘c’). This experiment confirms that the peptide, 1 can act
as a specific sensor for Cu(II) even in the presence of elevated levels of other competing divalent
transition metal ions. The Cu(II) induced quenching was found to be reversible with the
addition of excess EDTA.
To discern the nature of the complex formed between 1 and Cu(II) in solution, we examined
the system by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) (Fig. 1C). At 1:1 metal/lig-
and ratio, the signal obtained at a mass/charge (m/z) unit of 734.2 could be assigned to a species
corresponding to [M−2H+Cu]·H+. The presence of the peak at m/z of 673.2 is likely to be due
to the free peptide formed by decomplexation under ESI-MS conditions as further addition of
Cu(II) did not increase the intensity of the bound species. The corresponding tetrapeptide, 2
exhibited a signal corresponding to [M−4H+2Cu]H+ in ESI-MS, suggesting that two indepen-
dent co-ordination centers of similar nature as in 1 are present. Direct involvement of the central
tertiary amino group and the dansyl group in metal-complexation is less likely. We propose a
co-ordination scheme (Fig. 1D) that explains the ESI-MS results. Work is underway to obtain
crystals of the Cu(II) complexes of 1 and 2 to establish firmly the structure of the metal ligation
site.
The present system 1, which could be easily synthesized in solution phase, represents a simple,
yet unexplored class of peptide sensors for Cu(II) with high selectivity. As this motif selectively
targets Cu(II) ions, intramolecular quenching of the covalently tethered fluorophore represents
a convenient mechanism for signaling of Cu(II) binding. Functional devices based on 1 could be
designed for environmental monitoring of Cu(II) ions. We are now exploring the incorporation
of this peptide module into other peptides/proteins5a,b and minor groove binders6a,b for genera-
tion of affinity cleavage agents and chemical nucleases.6c–e
Acknowledgements
The work was supported by the Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India. We
thank Professor P. Balaram and C. Das of the Molecular Biophysics Unit of this institute for
ESI-MS spectra.
References
1. (a) Beer, P. D. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 71. In Chemosensors of Ion and Molecular Recognition; Desvergne, J. P.;
Czarnik, A. W., Eds. NATO ASI series, Series C; Kluwer Academic Press: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1997; Vol.
492. (b) de Silva, A. P.; Gunaratne, H. Q.; Gunnlaugsson, T.; Huxly, A. J. M.; McCoy, C. P.; Rademacher, J. T.;
Rice, T. E. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1515. (c) Fabbrizzi, L.; Poggi, A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1995, 197.
2. (a) Fabbrizzi, L.; Licchelli, M.; Pallavicini, P.; Parodi, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37, 800. (b) de Silva,
S. A.; Zavalsta, A.; Baron, D. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 2237. Gunnlaugsson, R. T.; Parker, D. Chem.
Commun. 2000, 47. (c) Walkup, G. K.; Imperiali, B. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 6727.
3. (a) Kraemer, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37, 772. (b) Torrado, A.; Walkup, G. K; Imperiali, B. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 609. (c) Santis, D. D.; Fabbrizzi, L.; Licchelli, M.; Mangano, C.; Sacchi, D.; Sardone, N.
Inorg. Chim. Acta 1997, 257, 69. (d) Corradini, R.; Dossena, A.; Galaverna, G.; Marchelli, R.; Panagia, A.; Sartor,
G. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 6283. (e) Yoon, J.; Ohler, N. E.; Vance, D. H.; Aumiller, W. D.; Czarnik, A. W.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 3845. (f) Thompson, R. B.; Ge, Z.; Patchan, M.; Huang, C.-C.; Fierke, C. A. Biosens.
Bioelectron. 1996, 11, 557. (g) Sasaki, D. Y.; Shnek, D. R.; Pack, D. W.; Arnold, F. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1995, 34, 905.