type allylations to be achieved,7 the reported gallium-
mediated reactions are only conducted in Barbier-type
procedures. Moreover, the gallium-mediated Barbier-type
allylation in THF requires heating at reflux.3b,8 Therefore,
we explored the formation of allylgallium species by addition
of a catalytic amount of a second metal element.9
A Barbier-type addition of allylic bromide to cyclodo-
decanone with gallium(0) was chosen as a probe for the
activating effects. Because of the low melting point (29.8
°C) of the gallium metal, the allylation was examined at 10
°C in order to avoid the formation of spherical gallium liquid,
which has the smallest surface area.10 Among the reactions
examined, addition of an indium metal to gallium(0) was
effective to promote the Barbier-type allylation. In addition,
the amount of indium metal could be reduced to 1 mol % of
gallium(0). For example, treatment of a mixture of cy-
clododecanone (1.0 mmol) and allyl bromide (1.5 mmol) in
THF with gallium(0) (0.90 mmol) and indium(0) (0.009
mmol) at 10 °C for 5 h gave 1-allylcyclododecanol (1) in
95% yield (Scheme 1). This reaction only proceeded when
with the THF solution of allylgallium at 10 °C for 5 h, 1
was obtained in 96% yield.15
The 1H and 13C NMR spectra of the prepared allylgallium
solution in THF-d8 exhibited two sets of allyl peaks (see
Supporting Information).16 The allylic methylene of the
allylgallium appeared at δ 1.63 and 1.93 ppm in a 2:1 ratio,
supporting the corresponding sesquibromide structure
(allyl)3Ga2Br3.17
A possible catalytic cycle for the formation of allylic
gallium compounds by indium is shown in Scheme 2. The
Scheme 2. Possible Catalytic Cycle for the Formation of 3
surface of commercially available indium metal is covered
with oxidized indium(III). Because the reducing power of
gallium is stronger than that of indium, the indium(III) is
reduced with gallium(0) to generate indium(0) with no
oxidized layer (step A).5 Indeed, a fine powder having a
metal luster appeared when a catalytic amount of indium
metal was added to a suspension of gallium(0) in THF at 10
°C. Allylic bromide is reduced with a catalytic amount of
this indium(0) to produce the allylindium species 2 (step B).7
Reduction of allylic bromide with the indium(0) proceeds
smoothly because it is freshly generated in situ. Then,
transmetalation of the allylindium species 2 with gallium-
(III) proceeds to give the allylgallium species 3 and indium-
(III) (step C). As expected from the mechanism, the
allylgallium species 3 could also be prepared by addition of
a catalytic amount of InCl3 instead of the indium metal.
Scheme 1. Addition of Allylgallium Species to
Cyclododecanone
the catalytic amount of indium was added. When indium(0)
was not used, cyclododecanone was recovered in 95% yield.
On the other hand, when gallium(0) was not used in the
Barbier-type allylation, the reaction proceeded with only a
stoichiometric amount of indium(0) (0.90 mmol), but the
yield of 1 was 64% and the ketone was recovered in 29%
yield.
The allylation of the ketone could also be conducted using
the Grignard procedure. For example, when a catalytic
amount of indium(0) (powder, 0.045 mmol)11 was added to
a mixture of allyl bromide (1.5 mmol) and gallium metal
(powder, 0.90 mmol)11 in THF (5 mL), all of the gallium
powder dissolved after 2 h stirring at 10 °C.12-14 On treatment
of a solution of cyclododecanone (1.0 mmol) in THF (5 mL)
(13) A standard solution of allylgallium in THF (ca. 1.0 M solution,
allyl bromide excess) was prepared as follows. A catalytic amount of indium
powder (0.90 mmol) was added to a mixture of allyl bromide (30 mmol)
and gallium metal (shot, 18 mmol) in THF (28 mL), and the mixture was
stirred at 10 °C for 24 h. When gallium powder was used, all of the gallium
dissolved at 10 °C within 2 h. The solution of allylgallium in THF could
be stored at 5 °C (in a refrigerator) for 1 month without decreasing the
reactivity, but the reactivity decreased gradually at 25 °C. An allylgallium
solution without contamination of allyl bromide could be prepared by using
an excess amount of gallium metal; however, the reactivity of this solution
decreased faster at 25 °C than that of the solution containing an excess
amount of allyl bromide, and the solution became viscose.
(14) A solution of allyl gallium in DME or DMF could also be prepared
in the same fashion.
(7) (a) Araki, S.; Shimizu, T.; Johar, P. S.; Jin, S.-J.; Butsugan, Y. J.
Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 2538. (b) Araki, S.; Ito, H.; Butsugan, Y. J. Org.
Chem. 1988, 53, 1831.
(8) Tertiary-amine accelerated allylgallation of terminal alkynes does not
proceed in DMF.3f Thus, a preparative method for a solution of allylgallium
sesquibromide in THF is required.
(15) Addition of 3 to 3-phenylpropanal in THF occurred at 10 °C in 30
min; however, the yield of 1-phenyl-5-hexen-1-ol (4) was 74% as a result
of the formation of the corresponding ketone derived by Oppenauer-type
oxidation in 7% yield and the diallylation product in 5% yield. See ref 4b.
Formation of these byproducts was suppressed by addition of DMF (1.0
equiv of the gallium metal) in the reaction mixture, and 4 was obtained in
93% yield.
(16) To consume all of the allyl bromide, an excess amount of gallium
metal was used for the preparation of the allylgallium species in THF-d8
solution. The supernatant solution was used for the NMR measurement.
(17) Araki reported the NMR data of the allylindium species. (Allyl)3-
In2I3: ref 7b. AllylInI2: Araki, S.; Ito, H.; Katsumura, N.; Butsugan, Y. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1989, 369, 291. Allylindium(I): Chan, T. H.; Yang, Y.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 3228.
(9) Activating effects by addition of PbCl2 or KI-LiCl on gallium were
not observed at 25 °C in our experiments.
(10) The melting point of gallium lowered to 15.3 °C when 21.4 wt %
of indium was added.
(11) Gallium powder (99.9% purity, particle size ca. 0.85 mm diameter),
shot (99.99%, ca. 1 g), and indium powder (99% purity, particle size ca.
75 µm diameter) were purchased from Kojundo Chemical Lab Co., Ltd.
(12) When a shot of gallium(0) was used, the metal dissolved in 24 h.
1728
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 10, 2002