Chemistry Letters Vol.34, No.5 (2005)
709
Table 3. Friedel–Crafts alkylations of anisole with acroleina
Table 1. Friedel–Crafts alkylations to acrolein using solid and
a
liquid catalysts
CHO
CHO
OMe
CHO
MeO
NaY (1.0 g)
5
6
reflux, 12 h
CHO
Entry
Catalyst
Yield/%
66 (29)c
ortho:parab
16:84 (16:84)c
18:82
Catalyst
CH2Cl2
r.t.
N
N
H
1
2
NaY
SiO2
1
H
2
5
Entry
Catalyst
Time
Yield/%
a
Anisole (10 mL) was reacted with arolein (1.0 mmol) in
the presence of catalysts (1.0 g) for 12 h. Determined by
H NMR. Reaction time was 6 h.
b
1
2
3
4
5
acrolein(3.0)@NaY
18 h
18 h
5 min
18 h
18 h
58
56
0
20
37
0
1
c
NaY
HY
NaX
SiO2
omy-type reaction without any formation of wastes or branched
alkyl isomers which are often encountered in the Lewis acid-cat-
alyzed Friedel–Crafts alkylation of aromatics with alkyl halides.
In addition, a formyl group on the side-chain can react with var-
ious nucleophiles or be transformed into other functional groups.
Application of the zeolite-catalyzed addition of acrolein to
chemical syntheses is underway.
b
.
6
BF3 OEt2
5 min
a
Acrolein (3.0 mmol) was reacted with indole (1.0 mmol).
Solid catalysts (1.0 g) were dried at 67 Pa and 673 K for 4 h
b
.
and used. BF3 OEt2 (1.0 mmol).
References and Notes
1
a
Table 2. Friedel–Crafts alkylations of indoles with acrolein
T. Okachi and M. Onaka, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 126, 2306
(2004).
R1
R1
CHO
CHO
2
M. Monduzzi, R. Monaci, and V. Solinas, J. Colloid Inter-
face Sci., 120, 8 (1987).
NaY
N
R
CH Cl
N
R
3
4
5
S. Imachi and M. Onaka, Tetrahedron Lett., 45, 4943 (2004).
G. Desimoni and G. Tacconi, Chem. Rev., 75, 651 (1975).
G. A. Olah, R. Krishnamurti, and G. K. S. Prakash, in ‘‘Com-
prehensive Organic Synthesis,’’ ed. by B. M. Trost and I.
Fleming, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1991), Vol. 3, p 293.
M. Strell and A. Kalojanoff, Chem. Ber., 87, 1025 (1954).
D. J. Denhart, R. J. Mattson, J. L. Ditta, and J. E. Macor,
Tetrahedron Lett., 45, 3803 (2004); J. F. Austin and D. W.
MacMillan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 124, 1172 (2002).
NaX (Molecular sieves 13X powder, Si/Al ¼ 1:4, SA ¼
2
2
3
2
r.t.
2
4
R1
R2
Entry
Time/h
Yield/%
1
2
3
4
5
H
H
Me
OMe
Cl
H
Me
H
H
H
18
18
12
24
3
56
45
56
42
72
6
7
a
Indoles (1.0 mmol) were reacted with acrolein (3.0 mmol) in
the presence of NaY (1.0 g).
8
2
820 m /g, Aldrich Chemical); NaY (HSZ-320NAA,
2
Si/Al ¼ 2:7, SA ¼ 800 m /g, Tosoh Corp); HY (JRC-Z-
2
showed better reactivity than 5-methoxyindole with an electron-
donating group (Entries 4 and 5).
The alkylation of anisole with acrolein was also successful
HY-5.5, Si/Al ¼ 2:8, SA ¼ 570 m /g, provided by the
Catalyst Society of Japan); silica (Silicagel 60, SA ¼ 500
2
m /g, MERCK).
Solid NMR measurements were carried out by means of sin-
ꢁ
in the presence of NaY under reflux at 154 C to afford the con-
9
ꢁ
jugated adduct 6 in 29% yield after 6 h, and 66% yield after 12 h,
respectively (Table 3, Entry 1). Acrolein molecules encapsulat-
ed in the confined nanospace of NaY could survive for a long re-
action period at such high temperatures. By contrast, SiO2 only
gave a poor yield of 5% after 12 h (Entry 2). To our knowledge,
there have been no reports on direct alkylation of benzene deriv-
atives using acrolein as an electrophile.
A typical procedure is described for the reaction of indole
with acrolein: to a mixture of indole (1.0 mmol) and NaY zeolite
1.0 g) in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) at room temperature (r.t.) was added
gle pulse direct excitation with proton decoupling (90
pulse = 5 ms, 5-s pulse delay, 1000 scans) and the probe
temperature was maintained at 273 K. Chemical shifts were
referenced to TMS as an internal standard, and sample spin-
ning rates were adjusted to ca. 3 kHz.
10 A broad signal near 110 ppm was inevitably derived from the
carbonaceous components around the sample probe in the
NMR instrument (Chemagnetics CMX-300).
ꢂ1
11 IR (CCl4, cm ): 3061, 2920, 2854, 2816, 2715, 1730;
1
(
H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): ꢀ 9.79 (t, J ¼ 1:6 Hz, 1H),
acrolein (3.0 mmol) in N2 atmosphere. The resulting suspension
was stirred for 18 h at r.t. Then, acetonitrile (10 mL) was added
in order to extract products sorbed in NaY zeolite, and the mix-
ture was filtrated and the solvent was removed. The crude prod-
8.03 (br, 1H), 7.57 (d, J ¼ 7:8 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (dd, J ¼ 8:2,
0.9 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (t, J ¼ 7:1 Hz, 1H), 7.12 (t, J ¼ 7:1 Hz,
1H), 6.90 (t, J ¼ 0:9 Hz, 1H), 3.08 (t, J ¼ 7:3 Hz, 2H),
1
3
2.81 (td, J ¼ 7:3, 1.6 Hz, 2H); C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3):
ꢀ 17.5, 43.8, 112.2, 114.3, 118.0, 122.4, 123.0, 125.0, 128.0,
134.6, 202.4.
1
1
uct was purified by preparative TLC to afford 2 in 56% yield.
The addition of aromatics to acrolein is a 100% atom econ-
Published on the web (Advance View) April 16, 2005; DOI 10.1246/cl.2005.708