Mendeleev Commun., 2013, 23, 84–85
Me
incomplete conversion, and monoallylation products 2b,c were
detected (entries 5, 10). The catalyst prepared from Pd dba and
Me
CN
2
3
1c
Me
+
OAc
1
,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane (dppe) in CH Cl was less
2 2
25% total
Me
CO Et
2
effective than Pd(PPh ) (entries 6, 11).
3
4
§
8
9
Similar reactions of acetylacetone 1d and malononitrile 1e
afforded the mixtures of mono- (2d,e) and diallylation (3d,e)
products in moderate total yields (Table 1, entries 12, 13). In these
cases, GC analysis could not be used to monitor the composition
of the mixtures because substrates 1d,e and monoallylated com-
pounds 2d,e were undetectable (moreover, they can occur as
potassium derivatives due to their high acidity). Therefore, the
preparative yields of isolated materials were used to characterize
the efficiency of these processes. The moderate yields of products
Me Me
Me
CN
CN
CN
+
+
Me
CO Et
2
Me CO Et
Me CO Et
2
2
9
'
9''
9'''
Scheme 3
2
d,e and 3d,e can be attributed to the lower nucleophilicity of 1d,e-
In the conclusion, the Tsuji–Trost reaction can be performed
and 2d,e-derived carbanions. This result allowed us to conclude
in scCO , although it turned to be very substrate-dependent under
2
that the dependence of the yield of an allylation product on the
studied conditions. However, the use of scCO in such a cross-
2
CH acidity of a XCH Y substrate approaches a maximum value
coupling can be promising in industry because the advantages
2
8
at pK 13–14: less acidic substrates are difficult to deprotonate
of scCO as a reaction medium are well-recognized.
a
2
while more acidic ones form low-nucleophilicity carbanions.
When malononitrile 1e was allylated in an autoclave of five times
smaller volume with the same loading of reactants (to diminish
dilution), the yield of product 3e was somewhat higher (entry 14),
however, it remained far from quantitative.
This work was supported by the Presidium of the Russian
Academy of Sciences (the basic research program PRAS-8).
Online Supplementary Materials
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found
in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.mencom.2013.03.009.
4
5
Substrates 4 (pK ~ 7.5) and 5 (pK ~ 10.15), which are
a
a
more acidic than 1d,e but have only one active proton, afforded
allylation derivatives 6, 7 in good yields (Scheme 2).
The prenylation of cyanoacetate 1c with 3-acetoxy-3-methyl-
References
but-1-ene 8 (Scheme 3) in scCO gave in a total yield of 25% a
2
1 (a) S. E. Lyubimov, I. V. Kuchurov, A. A. Vasil’ev, A. A. Tyutyunov, V. N.
Kalinin, V. A. Davankov and S. G. Zlotin, J. Organomet. Chem., 2009,
694, 3047; (b) S. E. Lyubimov, I. V. Kuchurov, A. A. Vasil’ev, S. G. Zlotin
and V. A. Davankov, Mendeleev Commun., 2010, 20, 143.
2 (a) B. M. Trost, Acc. Chem. Res., 1996, 29, 355; (b) B. M. Trost and D. L.
Van Vranken, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 395; (c) Z. Lu and S. Ma, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 258.
mixture of two expected normal (9) and iso (9') products and iso-
pentenyl analogues 9'' and 9''' bearing C H substituents of the
5
9
same skeleton with other positions of double bonds and linkage
1
sites (as judging from H NMR-spectroscopic and GC-MS data)
in a ratio of ~18:32:21:29. Similar isomerization within prenyl-
type p-allylic metal complexes leading to such by-products was
3
F. G. Bordwell, Acc. Chem. Res., 1988, 21, 456.
6
indicated earlier; it seems possible to occur at the elevated
4 I. A. Koppel, J. Koppel, V. Pihl, I. Leito, M. Mishima, V. M. Vlasov, L. M.
Yagupolskii and R. W. Taft, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 2000, 1125.
7(a)
temperature of our experiment. Previously, we have reported
5
6
V. H. Naringrekar and V. J. Stella, J. Pharm. Sci., 1990, 79, 138.
(a) T. Cuvigny, M. Julia and C. Rolando, J. Organomet. Chem., 1985, 285,
that the K CO -promoted prenylation of cyanoacetate 1c in DMF
2
3
at 20°C quantitatively afforded only isomers 9 and 9' in ratios
depending on the ligand applied.
Note that substrates 1a–e and 4 in dichloromethane at 20°C
give exhaustive allylation products in very good yields (for the
conditions, see ref. 7 and Online Supplementary Materials).
3
95; (b) T. Cuvigny and M. Julia, J. Organomet. Chem., 1986, 317, 383.
7
(a) A. A. Vasil’ev, S. E. Lyubimov, E. P. Serebryakov, V. A. Davankov,
M. I. Struchkova and S. G. Zlotin, Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Khim., 2010, 592
(Russ. Chem. Bull., Int. Ed., 2010, 59, 605); (b) A. A. Vasil’ev, S. E.
Lyubimov, E. P. Serebryakov, V.A. Davankov and S. G. Zlotin, Mendeleev
Commun., 2009, 19, 103; (c)A.A.Vasil’ev,S.E.Lyubimov,E.P.Serebryakov,
V. A. Davankov and S. G. Zlotin, Mendeleev Commun., 2012, 22, 39.
CN
Ph
i
CN
Ph
8 (a) D. J. Cole-Hamilton, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2006, 348, 1341; (b) E. J.
Beckman, J. Supercrit. Fluids, 2004, 28, 121; (c) J. Durand, E. Teuma
and M. Gomez, C. R. Chimie, 2007, 10, 152; (d) T. Ikariya andY. Kayaki,
Catal. Surv. Jpn., 2000, 4, 39; (e) P. G. Jessop, J. Supercrit. Fluids, 2006,
8
4%
CO2Et
CO Et
2
4
6
3
8, 211.
O
O
i
CO2Et
6
4%
CO2Et
5
7
Scheme 2 Reagents and conditions: i,AllOAc, Pd(PPh ) , K CO , 18-crown-6
,
3
4
2
3
scCO (170 atm), 75°C, 18 h.
2
§
1
Judging from H NMR spectra, monoallylacetylacetone 2d in CDCl3
exists as a mixture of enol and keto forms in a 1:1 ratio.
Received: 24th January 2013; Com. 13/4055
–
85 –