byproducts, the structural elucidation of unknowns as well as the
differentiation of the positional isomers remains difficult, even if
MS/MS or MSn experiments is included.12 As a result, the use of
complementary techniques is necessary to get a full and unam-
biguous identification of byproducts.
Chart 1. Iodosulfuron Methyl Ester Chemical
Structure
The HPLC/NMR technique is one of the most powerful
methods for the structural elucidation of unknown compounds
and the differentiation of structural isomers. It complements the
HPLC/UV/MS methods well: whereas HPLC/MS provides
important information on the molecular weight and the presence
of certain functional groups, HPLC/NMR gives structural informa-
tion on the constitution and the isomeric substitution of unknown
molecules. Moreover, as a result of the very narrow resonance
signals in modern high-field NMR, the resolution of information
is also improved considerably and is comparable to that of GC/
MS.13
The recent progress in pulse field gradients and solvent
suppression, the improvements in probe technology, and the
construction of high-field magnets have increased the sensitivity
of the method and given a new stimulus to this technique, which
has emerged since the mid 1990s as a very efficient tool for the
on-line identification of organic molecules.
Nowadays, directly coupled HPLC/1H NMR spectroscopy is
a commercially available technique that has been applied suc-
cessfully in many cases in analytical chemistry, in particular to
the identification of drug metabolites, natural products, and peptide
libraries.14-20 Furthermore, in the past few years, several studies
have illustrated the capability of HPLC/NMR for the analysis of
complex environmental samples, including the quantification of
pollutants and their degradation products over an environmentally
relevant range of concentrations.21-26
In this study, we present, for the first time, the application of
combined HPLC/UV/MS and HPLC/1H NMR on-line coupling
methods for an unequivocal identification of the byproducts
resulting from the photocatalytic degradation of iodosulfuron (see
structure in Chart 1), a new member of the sulfonylurea group of
herbicides which has recently entered our environment.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
Chemicals, Reagents, and Standards. Iodosulfuron methyl
ester (IOME) (methyl-4-iodo-2-[({[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-tri-
azin-2-yl)-amino]carbonyl }amino)sulfonyl]-benzoate (>98%) was
provided by Bayer Crop Science (Lyon, France). The following
reference compounds for confirmation of the identified compounds
were purchased from Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany): cyanuric
acid [2,4,6-trihydroxy-1,3,5-triazine] (98%), ammelide [2-amino-4,6-
dihydroxy-1,3,5-triazine] (97%) and s-triazine. For solubility and
stability reasons,27 stock solutions of IOME (200 and 1000 mg‚L-1
)
were prepared in ultrapure water buffered with KH2PO4/K2HPO4
at pH 6.5 and stored at 4 °C in the dark. The photocatalyst was
TiO2, Degussa P-25, mainly anatase, with a specific area of 50 m2
g-1 and a mean particle size of 30 nm.
Acetonitrile (quality HPLC grade and quality NMR), methanol
(HPLC grade), and deuterium oxide (99.9%) were purchased from
SDS (Peypin, France). Water was obtained from a Millipore
Waters Milli-Q water purification system (Molsheim, France).
ortho-Phosphoric acid (85%) and formic acid (MS grade, 99%
purity) were from Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). Other reagents
were of at least analytical grade.
Irradiation Procedure. The irradiation experiments were
carried out in an open Pyrex glass cell (cutoff at 295 nm, 4.0-cm
diameter, 2.3-cm height), containing 25 mL of the aqueous
suspension of IOME and TiO2 powder. The light source was a
HPK 125 W Philips mercury lamp, cooled with water circulation.
For all experiments, the cell temperature during irradiation was
adjusted to 20 °C, the suspensions were magnetically stirred, and
(10) Malato, S.; Caceres, J.; Fernandez-Alba, A. R.; Piedra, L.; Hernando, A. D.;
Aguera, A.; Vial, J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 2516-2524.
(11) Vulliet, E.; Emmelin, C.; Chovelon, J. M.; Guillard, C.; Herrmann, J. M. Appl.
Catal., B 2002, 38, 127-137.
(12) Rafqah, S.; Wong-Wah-Chung, P.; Aamili, A.; Sarakha, M. J. Mol. Catal. A:
Chem. 2005, 237, 50-59.
(13) Preiss, A.; Levsen, K.; Humpfer, E.; Spraul, M. Fresenius’ J. Anal. Chem.
1996, 356, 445-451.
the concentration of TiO2 was set to 2.5 g‚L-1
.
(14) Albert, K. J. Chromatogr., A 1999, 856, 199-211.
(15) Lindon, J. C.; Nicholson, J. K.; Wilson, I. D. J. Chromatogr., B 2000, 748,
233-258.
During the irradiation, aliquots of the aqueous suspension were
collected at predefined times and filtered through 0.45-µm PVDF
filters (Millipore) to remove TiO2 particles.
(16) Sandvoss, M.; Weltring, A.; Preiss, A.; Levsen, K.; Wuensch, G. J. Chro-
matogr., A 2001, 917, 75-86.
Solid-Phase Extraction (SPE). To develop a sample extrac-
tion method adapted to a maximum number of degradation
products which may have very different chemical properties and
polarities (and a priori unknown), two types of SPE cartridges
from International Sorbent Technology (IST, Cambridge, UK)
were used: (a) Isolute C18 (500 mg/6 mL), to extract IOME and
its “first generation products” and (b) Isolute ENV+ (200 mg/6
mL), a hydroxylated, highly cross-linked polystyrene/divinyl
benzene copolymer (St-DVB) to concentrate more polar products
as triazine derivatives.
(17) Peng, S. X. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2000, 14, 430-441.
(18) Bobzin, S. C.; Yang, S. T.; Kasten, T. P. J. Chromatogr., B 2000, 748, 259-
267.
(19) Wolfender, J. L.; Ndjoko, K.; Hostettmann, K. Phytochem. Anal. 2001, 12,
2-22.
(20) Wilson, I. D.; Lindon, J. C.; Nicholson, J. K. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72, 534-
542.
(21) Levsen, K.; Preiss, A.; Godejohann, M. Trends Anal. Chem. 2000, 19, 27-
48.
(22) Benfenati, E.; Pierucci, P.; Fanelli, R.; Preiss, A.; Godejohann, M.; Astratov,
M.; Levsen, K.; Barcelo´, D. J. Chromatogr., A 1999, 831, 243-256.
(23) Preiss, A.; Sa¨nger, U.; Karfich, N.; Levsen, K.; Mu¨gge, C. Anal. Chem. 2000,
72, 992-998.
(24) Godejohann, M.; Preiss, A.; Mu¨gge, C.; Wu¨nsch, G. Anal. Chem. 1997,
69, 3832-3837.
(25) Godejohann, M.; Astratov, M.; Preiss, A.; Levsen, K.; Mu¨gge, C. Anal. Chem.
1998, 70, 4104-4110.
(26) Godejohann, M.; Preiss, A.; Mu¨gge, C. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 590-595.
The efficiency of the preconcentration of each of both used
cartridges has been studied for different conditions (pH of the
(27) Brigante, M.; Emmelin, C.; Previtera, L.; Baudot, R.; Chovelon, J. M. J. Agric.
Food Chem. 2005, 53, 5347-5352.
2958 Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 78, No. 9, May 1, 2006