Having developed a solution to the production of the
crossed photocycloadduct, the selective cleavage of the
cyclobutane was investigated. If the exocyclic olefin of
cyclobutane 27 could be oxidized to a carbonyl, diol, or
epoxide, and the acetoxy group converted to a radical
precursor, cleavage of the cyclobutane to yield a bridgehead
olefin might be possible. Molecular models indicate a nearly
perfect antiperiplanar arrangement between the C-O bond
of the acetate and the internal cyclobutane bond which would
be cleaved. The added influence of the ester and ketone
carbonyl groups could also help to weaken the cyclobutane
bond and stabilize the developing radical center. Oxidation
of the alkene proved difficult under standard conditions such
as ozonolyis and osmium tetroxide dihydroxylation, but
Figure 5. Structure of CP263,114.
An indirect solution to the preparation of the previously
elusive crossed adducts of intramolecular photocycloadditions
has been developed. The incorporation of a temporary tether
allows the reversal of regioselectivity in the photoaddition
and subsequent removal of the temporary linker gives the
desired crossed photoadduct. The crossed cyclobutane adduct
has also been further elaborated to a bridged bicyclic alkene
through the use of a selective cyclobutylcarbinyl radical
fragmentation. Application of this strategy to more highly
substituted substrates for the synthesis of CP263,114 and
other novel bicyclic compounds is in progress.
1
6
epoxidation could be effected with dimethyldioxirane to
produce epoxide 29. The acetate was removed with potas-
sium carbonate in methanol to give the corresponding alcohol
30 that was readily converted to thiocarbamate 31 in 92%
yield in the presence of thiocarbonyl diimidazole (Scheme
7). Exposure of thiocarbamate 31 to tributylstannane in
Scheme 7
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by a re-
search grant from the National Institutes of Health (GM38904).
OL991272D
(
12) Schwab, P.; Grubbs, R. H.; Ziller, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
1
1
1
18, 100-110. Grubbs, R. H.; Miller, S. J.; Fu, G. C. Acc. Chem. Res.
995, 28, 446-452. Fu, G. C.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992,
14, 7324-7325.
(13) Crimmins, M. T.; King, B. W.J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9084-
9
085.
14) Node, M.; Kajimoto, T.; Nishide, K.; Fujita, E.; Fuji, K. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1984, 25, 219-222.
15) Miyoshi, N.; Hatayama, Y.; Ryu, I.; Kambe, N.; Murai, T.; Murai,
(
(
S.; Sonoda, N. Synthesis 1988, 175-178.
(
16) Murray, R. W. Chem. ReV. 1989, 89, 1187-1201.
(17) For an excellent review on radical rearrangements, see: Dowd, P.;
Zhang, W. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93, 2091-2115. See also: Rawal, V. H.;
Dufour, C.; Iwasa, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 19-22. Zheng, W.;
Collins, M. R.; Mahmood, K.; Dowd, P.; Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 2729-
benzene resulted in selective cleavage of the more substituted
2
732. Lange, G. L. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 2183-2187. Lange, G. L.;
cyclobutane bond, generating bicyclic alkene 32 in good
Gottardo, C. Tetrahedron 1990, 31, 5985-5988. Lange, G. L.; Gottardo,
C. Tetrahedron 1994, 35, 8513-8516. Ranu, B.; Das, A. R. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1994, 921-922.
17
yield. Alkene 32 contains much of the required functionality
and all the carbon framework of the core of the novel natural
(18) Dabrah, T. T.; Kaneko, T.; Massefski, W., Jr.; Whipple, E. B. J.
18
product CP263,114 (Figure 5).
Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 1594-1598.
284
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 3, 2000