K. Yamatani et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1206 (2020) 127689
3
18H), 0.22 (s, 12H); Rf: 0.45 (Hexane: EtOAc ¼ 2 : 1 (v:v)).
2.1.1.6. Synthesis of 2,6-di-O,N-(E)-3,4-bis(tert-butyldimethylsily-
was prepared so as to be 65
m
M CH3OH in quartz cell. The solution
was treated with nitrogen bubbling. While stirring, the solution
was irradiated with UV light using UV irradiation machine (Hg
loxy)caffeoyl-1,3,4-tri-O-benzyl- -glucosamine (10). To a solution of
D
lump, l
> 280 nm, 56 mW/cm2) in the iced bath under the nitrogen
(E)-3-(3,4-bis((tert-utyldimethylsilyl)oxy)caffeic acid (8) (0.767 g,
1.88 mmol) and 1 M SOCl2/CH2Cl2 (7.5 mL, 7.50 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2
(1.8 mL) was stirred and reflux for 15 h under the nitrogen atmo-
sphere in 100 mL 2-neck eggplant shaped flask. After completion of
the reaction, the solution was concentrated to obtain acid chloride
atmosphere to occur the [2 þ 2] photocyclization. The irradiation
condition (irradiated area: 3 cm2, distance to the source of UV light:
5 cm) was fixed. The solution of UVeVis spectra were measured at
0, 10, 20, 30 s, 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 20, 30, 60, 120, 180 and 240 min.
Photo reactivity of 2,6-Di-O,N-(E)-caffeoyl-1,3,4-tri-O-benzyl-
D
-
(9).To a solution of 1,3,4-Tri-O-benzyl- -glucosamine (6) (0.352 g,
D
glucosamine (11) in H2O
0.783 mmol) and Me2SnCl2 (0.0188 g, 0.0783 mmol) and DIPEA
(N,N-Diisopropylethylamine) (0.55 mL, 3.13 mmol) in dry THF
(1.0 mL) was stirred under the nitrogen atmosphere in 50 mL 2-
neck eggplant shaped flask. Acid chloride (9) in dry THF (1.5 mL)
was added to the solution at room temperature and the solution
was stirred for 24 h. After completion of the reaction, the solution
was extracted with ethyl acetate and H2O. The organic layer was
dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated. The crude was purified by silica
gel column chromatography with hexane/ethyl acetate (1:1) to give
compound 10 as pale yellow crystal (0.535 g, 4.35 mmol, 55%).
2,6-Di-O,N-(E)-caffeoyl-1,3,4-tri-O-benzyl- -glucosamine (11)
D
was prepared so as to be 1.0 mM aqueous solution in screw bial. The
solution was treated with nitrogen bubbling. While stirring, the
solution was irradiated with UV light using UV irradiation machine
(Hg lump,
l
> 280 nm, 56 mW/cm2) in the iced bath under the
nitrogen atmosphere to occur the [2 þ 2] photocyclization. The
irradiation condition (distance to the source of UV light: 5 cm) was
fixed. The solution was irradiated by UV light for 4 h. After irradi-
ation, the mixture was washed with CH3OH and acetone. The sol-
uble part (0.009 g, 12%) and insoluble part (0.068 g, 88%) were
collected respectively.
1H NMR 400 MHz (CDCl3):
d
(ppm) 7.59 (d, J ¼ 16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.47
(d, J ¼ 15.6 Hz, 1H), 7.37e7.27 (m, 15H), 7.02e6.96 (m, 4H), 6.82 (d,
J ¼ 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.26 (d, J ¼ 16.0 Hz,1H), 5.93 (d, J ¼ 15.6 Hz,1H), 5.38
(d, J ¼ 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.97e4.59 (m, 6H), 4.51e4.45 (m, 3H), 4.36 (m,
1H), 3.97 (m 1H), 3.85e3.74 (m, 2H), 1.00 (s, 36H), 0.22 (s, 24H).
ESI-MS ¼ [MþNa]þ ¼ 1253.69; FT-IR: 2929, 2858, 1712, 1508,
1286, 1251, 1165, 1124, 904, 837, 779, 694 cmꢁ1; Rf: 0.23 (Hexane:
EtOAc ¼ 4 : 1 (v:v)).
3. Results and discussion
Initially, we had planned to synthesize the target compound
directly without protecting groups, however, it was very difficult to
confirm whether the product was target compound or not by thin
layer chromatography (TLC). So, the protective groups were utilized
for the N-position and 6-O-position as shown in Scheme 1.
Considering the introduction of functional groups at N- and 6-O-
positions with different reactivities from the other positions, it was
necessary to protect the rest of 2-O-, 3-O-, and 4-O- hydroxyl po-
sitions at first. So, the careful selection of protecting groups for 2-O-
, 3-O-, and 4-O- hydroxyl positions was required to keep the other
protecting groups stable at N- and 6-hydroxyl positions under their
deprotection reaction at 2-O-, 3-O-, and 4-O- hydroxyl positions.
We selected the Boc group which could be removed under acidic
conditions for the protection of the amino group at the N-position,
and we selected the silyl group for the selective protection of the
primary alcohol at the 6-O-position. Next, the protection of the
three hydroxyl groups was attempted as shown in Scheme 2.
Actually, the compound 4 could not be obtained under some
conditions, although the reason was unclear. For example, the
proton at the N-position also reacted under an excessive amount of
NaH (6 eq). No reaction was confirmed under the milder alkaline
condition, such as the triethylamine and the potassium carbonate
at room temperature. Furthermore, some reactions could not pro-
ceed because of the poor reactivity after protections and the failure
of the selective deprotections. Thus, we pursue the different
pathway to synthesize the target compound. That was the reason
why we synthesized 6 through the synthesis roots in Scheme 2 and
the following Scheme 3.
Using compound 4, selective deprotection of TBDPS was ach-
ieved in THF at room temperature. Successively, the deprotection of
the Boc group proceeded under an acidic condition with 10eq. of
the trifluoro acetic acid at room temperature. Although compound
6 is a reported compound elsewhere [12], it is noteworthy that the
total steps of the synthesis decreased with the higher yield. In order
to conjugate with compound 6, the caffeic acid derivative 9 was
synthesized by the following reaction as shown in Scheme 4, using
the N-position and 6-O-position of compound 6.
Two aromatic hydroxyl groups were protected by the t-butyl-
dimethylsilyl group, then the tionyl chloride was treated with
compound 8, in order to react with the amide or the primary
alcohol of compound 6. The obtained compound 9 was directly
2.1.1.7. Synthesis of 2,6-di-O,N-(E)-caffeoyl-1,3,4-tri-O-benzyl-
glucosamine (11). To solution of 2,6-Di-O,N-(E)-3,4-bis(tert-
butyldimethylsilyloxy)caffeoyl-1,3,4-tri-O- benzyl- -glucosamine
D-
a
D
(10) (0.807 g, 0.656 mmol) and TBAF (3.2 mL, 3.15 mmol) in dry THF
(0.60 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 3 h under the ni-
trogen atmosphere in 50 mL 2-neck eggplant shaped flask. The
solution was extracted with CH2Cl2 and H2O. The organic layer was
dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated. The crude was purified by silica
gel column chromatography with CH2Cl2/CH3OH (9:1) to give
compound 11 as brown crystal (0.406 g, 0.525 mmol, 80%).
1H NMR 400 MHz (DMSO‑d6):
d (ppm) 9.64 (s, 1H), 9.41 (s, 1H),
9.18 (s, 2H), 8.31 (d, J ¼ 9.2 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (s, 1H), 7.40e7.19 (m, 15H),
7.07e6.85 (m, 4H), 6.74 (d, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.53 (d, J ¼ 15.6 Hz, 1H),
6.35 (d, J ¼ 15.6 Hz, 1H), 5.28 (s, 1H), 4.83e4.57 (m, 6H), 4.51 (m,
1H), 4.38 (m, 1H), 4.30e4.15 (m, 2H), 3.92e3.81 (m, 2H), 3.63 (t,
1H).
ESI-MS ¼ [MþNa]þ ¼ 796.27; FT-IR: 3294, 2954, 2927, 1693,
1597, 1514, 1273, 1157, 1112, 1016, 977, 696 cmꢁ1; Rf: 0.53 (CH2Cl2:
CH3OH ¼ 9 : 1 (v:v)).
2.1.2. Photo reactivity
Photo reactivity of 2,6-Di-O,N-(E)-3,4-bis(tert-butyldimethylsi-
lyloxy)caffeoyl-1,3,4-tri-O-benzyl-
2,6-Di-O,N-(E)-3,4-bis(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)caffeoyl-
1,3,4-tri-O-benzyl- -glucosamine (10) was prepared so as to be
45 M CH3OH in quartz cell. The solution was treated with nitrogen
bubbling. While stirring, the solution was irradiated by UV light
using UV irradiation machine (Hg lump,
> 280 nm, 56 mW/cm2)
D-glucosamine (10) in CH3OH
D
m
l
in the iced bath under the nitrogen atmosphere to occur the [2 þ 2]
photocyclization. The irradiation condition (irradiated area: 3 cm2,
distance to the source of UV light: 5 cm) was fixed. The UVeVis
spectra of solution was measured at 0, 10, 20, 30 s, 1, 2, 3, 5, 10,
20, 30, 60, 120, 180 and 240 min.
Photo reactivity of 2,6-Di-O,N-(E)-caffeoyl-1,3,4-tri-O-benzyl-
glucosamine (11) in CH3OH
D-
2,6-Di-O,N-(E)-caffeoyl-1,3,4-tri-O-benzyl- -glucosamine (11)
D