Barolo et al.
P h otostim u la ted Rea ction of 1-Tetr a lon e En ola te Ion s
(8b) w ith 1 in Liqu id Am m on ia . The following procedure
is representative of all these reactions. Into a three-necked,
250 mL, round-bottomed flask equipped with a coldfinger
condenser charged with dry ice-ethanol, a nitrogen inlet, and
a magnetic stirrer was condensed 150 mL of ammonia previ-
ously dried with sodium metal under nitrogen. The t-BuOK
(2.0 mmol) and 1-tetralone (1.5 mmol) were added. To this
solution was added 0.5 mmol of 1, and the mixture was
irradiated for 120 min. The reaction was quenched by addition
of ammonium nitrate in excess, and the ammonia was allowed
to evaporate. The residue was dissolved with water and then
extracted with methylene chloride, and the organic extract was
washed with water and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The
iodide ions in the aqueous solution were determined poten-
tiometrically. The product was quantified by GLC using the
internal standard method. In other runs, the solvent was
removed under reduced pressure and the residue obtained was
purified by radial TLC (eluted with petroleum ether (60-80
°C): acetone).
by the SRN1 mechanism and only 8% yield by the Fisher
indole synthesis.25
Although we found that FeBr2 induced the reaction of
ketone enolate ions to form indoles in high yields by the
S
RN1 mechanism,20 the ketone enolate ions studied in the
present investigation cannot be induced to react by the
inorganic salt intermediacy. The role of Fe2+ ion in the
reaction still remains intriguing. Its presence is required
from catalytic to equimolecular amounts, which depends
on the leaving group and the nucleophile used.
In the photostimulated reactions of substrate 3 and the
ketone enolate ions 6 (46-48% yields of indole 7), and
8b (36% of the fused indole 12), the product yields are
lower than those with substrate 1. However, considering
the availability/simplicity of the starting materials, and
the readiness of the procedure, this reaction becomes a
valid alternative to the synthesis of indoles.
Isola tion a n d Id en tifica tion of P r od u cts. 2-P yr id in -2-
yl-1H-in d ole (5a ). Compound 5a was purified by radial TLC
(eluent: gradient 98-90% petroleum ether:acetone); light
yellow crystals were obtained. Mp: 150-152 °C (lit.28 mp 154-
Exp er im en ta l Section
Gen er a l Meth od s. 1H NMR (200.13 MHz) and 13C NMR
(50.32 MHz) spectra were conducted in CDCl3 or acetone-d6
as solvents. Coupling constants (J ) are given in Hz. The
internal standard method was used for quantitative GC
analysis using authentic samples, the column employed was
an HP1 column (0.53 mm × 5m) with an HP data system.
Liquid chromatographic analyses were performed with a
gradient pump with a variable-wavelength monitor (program-
mable detector, covering the 190 nm to 600 nm UV range)
using a Spherisorb ODS 2 column (4.0 mm × 250 mm). The
purification of the products was done with radial TLC using
silica gel 60 PF-254 with calcium sulfate as binder. Irradiation
was conducted in a photochemical reactor equipped with two
400-W Hg lamps emitting maximally at 350 nm (air and water
refrigerated). Potentiometric titration of halide ions was
performed in a pHmeter using a Ag/Ag+ electrode. Melting
points were uncorrected.
Ma ter ia ls. t-BuOK was commercially available and used
as received. DMSO was distilled under vacuum and stored
under molecular sieves (4 Å). o-Iodoaniline, 2-acetylpyridine,
4-acetypyridine, 1-tetralone, 2-tetralone, 1-indanone, 2-in-
danone, acetophenone, and 1-benzosuberone were commer-
cially available and distilled under reduced pressure. 1-Bromo-
2-naphthylamine19 and 1-iodo-2-naphthylamine26,27 wereprepared
as previously reported.
P h otostim u la ted Rea ction of 1-Tetr a lon e En ola te Ion s
(8b) w ith o-Iod oa n ilin e (1) in DMSO. The following proce-
dure is representative of all these reactions. They were carried
out in a 50 mL three-neck round-bottomed flask equipped with
nitrogen inlet and magnetic stirrer. To 20 mL of dry and de-
oxygenated DMSO under nitrogen was added 2.55 mmol (0.286
g) of t-BuOK and 2.50 mmol (0.365 g) of 1-tetralone. After 15
min, 1 (0.50 mmol, 0.110 g) was added and the reaction
mixture was irradiated for 180 min. The reaction was quenched
with an excess of ammonium nitrate and water. The mixture
was extracted with methylene chloride, and the organic extract
was washed with water, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and
then quantified by GLC using the internal standard method.
The iodide ions in the aqueous solution were determined
potentiometrically.
1
155 °C). H NMR (CDCl3) δH: 9.91 (1H, br s); 8.56 (1H, ddd,
J ) 4.8, 1.8, 1.1); 7.79 (1H, td, J ) 8.0, 1.1); 7.68 (1H, td, J )
8.0, 1.8); 7.64 (1H, dt, J ) 8.0); 7.35 (1H, br d, J ) 8.0); 7.23-
7.05 (3H, cplx m); 7.01 (1H, dd, J ) 2.2, 0.7). 13C NMR (CDCl3)
δC: 150.44; 149.07; 136.72; 136.59; 129.10; 123.11; 121.93;
121.12; 120.09; 119.88; 111.36; 100.58. GC/MS EI, m/z: 195
(13); 194 (100); 193 (34); 167 (8); 166 (8); 97 (10); 89 (10); 83
(6); 78 (7); 63 (6).
2-P yr id in -4-yl-1H-in d ole (5b). Compound 5b was purified
by radial TLC (eluent: gradient 100-70% petroleum ether/
acetone); white crystals were obtained. Recrystallization from
ethanol produces needlelike white crystals. Mp: 204-206 °C
1
(lit.29 mp 208-209 °C). H NMR (CD3COCD3) δH: 10.91 (2 H,
br s); 8.61 (2 H, dd, J ) 4.4, 1.5); 7.78 (1H, dd, J ) 4.4, 1.8);
7.63 (1H, br d, J ) 7.9); 7.45 (1H, dd, J ) 7.9, 0.74); 7.22-
7.03 (3H, cplx.m). 13C NMR (CD3COCD3) δC: 151.30; 140.32;
138.91; 135.89; 129.80; 123.97; 121.81; 120.98; 119.91; 112.43;
102.79. GC/MS EI, m/z: 195 (14); 194 (100); 193 (20); 167 (7);
166 (9); 140 (6); 139 (8); 97 (11); 90 (10); 89 (12); 83 (6); 70 (9).
2-P h en yl-3H-ben zo(e)in d ole (7). Compound 7 was puri-
fied by radial TLC (eluent: hexanes); white crystals were
obtained. Mp: 135-136 °C (lit.30 mp 132 °C). 1H NMR (CDCl3)
δH: 8.62 (1H, br s); 8.26 (1H, br d, J ) 8.0); 7.89 (1H, br d, J
) 8.0); 7.72-7.68 (2H, cplx m); 7.62-7.24 (8H, cplx m). 13C
NMR (CDCl3) δC: 136.11; 133.25; 132.47; 129.37; 129.07;
128.61; 128.07; 127.35; 125.84; 124.84; 124.30; 123.52; 123.33;
122.95; 112.50; 99.32. GC/MS EI, m/z: 244 (21); 243 (100); 242
(13); 215 (8); 140 (9); 139 (17); 122 (30); 121 (15); 106 (5); 94
(8). Compound 7 was quantified by HPLC with MeOH/H2O
(75:25) as eluent.
5,10-Dih yd r oin d en o[1,2-b]in d ole (9a ). Compound 9a was
purified by radial TLC (eluent: petroleum ether); light yellow
crystals were obtained. Mp: 208-210 °C dec (lit.31 mp 226-
227 °C, lit.32 mp 235 °C dec, lit.33 mp 249-255 °C dec). 1H NMR
(CD3COCD3) δH: 10.63 (1H, br s); 7.61-7.44 (4H, cplx m); 7.32
(1H, br t, J ) 7.4); 7.19 (1H, td, J ) 7.4, 1.1); 7.12-7.02 (2H,
10 lines); 3.71 (2H, br s). 13C NMR (CDCl3) δC: 147.83; 143.36;
140.69; 135.03; 130.88; 128.80; 126.57; 125.51; 124.79; 121.74;
Alternatively, in other runs the solvent was removed under
reduced pressure and the residue obtained was purified by
radial TLC (eluted with petroleum ether (60-80 °C): acetone).
(28) Liu, S.-F.; Wu, Q.; Schmider, H. L.; Aziz, H.; Hu, N.-X.; Popovic,
Z.; Wang, S. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3671.
(29) Gray, A. P.; Archer, W. L. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79, 3554.
(30) Bansal, R. K.; Sharma, S. K. J . Organomet. Chem. 1978, 149,
309.
(31) Carruthers, W.; Evans, N. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1974,
1523.
(32) Brown, R. F. C.; Coulston, K. J .; Eastwood, F. W.; Moffat, M.
R. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 7763.
(33) Abraham, T.; Curran, D. P. Tetrahedron 1982, 38, 1019.
(25) Brown, D. W.; Graupner, P. R.; Sainsbury, M.; Shertzer, H. G.
Tetrahedron 1991, 47, 4383.
(26) Kalinin, V. N.; Shostakovsky, M. V.; Ponomaryov, A. B.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 373.
(27) Brewster, R. Q. Organic Syntheses; Wiley: New York, 1943;
Collect. Vol. II, p 347.
2810 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 68, No. 7, 2003