the fact that triethylaluminum disproportionates in the
presence of various metals into ethylene and the highly
reactive diethylaluminum hydride,5 no reduction products of
the amines (i.e., nonalkylated saturated amines) could be
detected. The experiment listed as entry 1 indicates that the
lanthanide-promoted alkylation is applicable also to Schiff
base methylations. The application of a chiral catalyst [(+)-
Eu(tfc)3] in this experiment led to the formation of the
optically active (R)-(+)-C6H5CH(CH3)NHC6H5 of 82% opti-
cal purity.6
effect on the process was studied between 2 and 78 °C and
was found to give the best results at 22-28 °C.
The clean ethylation of 4-[(phenylimino)methyl]benzo-
nitrile, 4-NCC6H4CHdNC6H5 to give solely 4-(1-anilino-
propyl)benzonitrile is rather surprising, because Eu(dpm)3
also catalyzes the slow ethylation of aromatic nitriles to form
ethylimines that are hydrolyzed during the workup to the
corresponding ketones. For example, benzo- and 1-naphtho-
nitrile are converted under the conditions of Table 1 within
24 h into 47 and 4% of 1-phenylpropanone and 1-(1-
naphthyl)propanone, respectively.10 The selective alkylation
of 4-NCC6H4CHdNC6H5 at the double bond may thus be
rationalized by the significant difference between the rate
of ethylation of the imine and the nitrile functions.
Two possible mechanisms for the lanthanide-assisted
alkylation of Schiff bases by Et3Al are considered. The fact
that the catalytic activity of various lanthanide compounds
is often assigned to their Lewis acidity,11 and the observation
that the addition of some metal alkyls to imines is promoted
by acids12 could suggest Lewis acid alkylation for our
process. However, experiments to replace the lanthanide
catalysts in the ethylation of C6H5CHdNC6H5 by Me3SiCl,
BF3, InCl3, or ZnCl2 (which enhance the ethylation of the
Schiff base by Et2Zn12) gave negative results. Only a large
molar excess of either the silicon or the zinc compound
afforded traces of C6H5CH(C6H5)NHC6H5 at room temper-
ature. Thus, we assume that it is more likely that our
ethylation proceeds via the intermediacy of an alkyl lan-
thanide formed from Et3Al by transmetalation. The ability
of such lanthanide compounds to alkylate unsaturated
substrates,13 including carbon-nitrogen multiple bonds, has
already been demonstrated.11
Both the nature of the lanthanide metal and the ligands
on the catalysts were found to affect the reaction rate. Among
the four catalysts studied, Eu(dpm)3, (O,C-6-22)-tris[1,7,7-
trimethyl-3-(trifluoroacetyl)bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-onato-
O,O′]europium [Eu(tfc)3], (O,C-6-22)-tris-[1,7,7-trimethyl-
3-(trifluoroacetyl)bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-onato-O,O′]praseo-
dymium [Pr(tfc)3], and ytterbium(+3) trifluoromethane-
sulfonate [Yb(OTf)3] (see entries 2-5), the Eu(dpm)3 was
found to be the most efficient. The alkylation proved to
depend on the electronic nature of the unsaturated substrate.
While electron-withdrawing groups (Cl, CN) seem to en-
hance the rate, the electron-donating methyl group located
on either the benzylidene or the benzeneamine moiety causes
the ethylation to slow as compared with the reaction rate of
the unsubstituted N-(1-phenylmethylene)aniline. This de-
pendence is opposite to that observed in the ethylation of
Schiff bases by Et2Zn and by Et2Cd.7 N-(2-Pyridylmethyl-
ene)aniline (entry 10) is the only Schiff base studied that, at
room-temperature, undergoes slow alkylation in the absence
of the lanthanide catalyst. However, under such conditions,
a variety of undesired side products are formed. In the
presence of Eu(dpm)3, pure N-[(1-pyridin-2-yl)propyl]aniline
is obtained in quantitative yield. It is notable that, under the
conditions of Table 1, optimum results are obtained when a
1:1 molar ratio of the substrate and Et3Al is employed.
Additional reagent has no effect on the yield. The methylation
of the Schiff bases requires, however, the presence of excess
Me3Al.8 The rate dependence of the ethylation of N-(1-
phenylmethylene)aniline by Eu(dpm)3 on the nature of the
solvent was shown to decrease in the order benzene >
benzene-hexane > hexane > dichloromethane > dimethyl-
formamide. No reaction takes place in THF, which strongly
coordinates with the aluminum reagent.9 The temperature
In summary, Et3Al, which fails to alkylate aromatic Schiff
bases, is activated by several lanthanide catalysts. The imines
undergo selective C-alkylation, which is assumed to take
place via an alkyllanthanide intermediate. The application
of a chiral europium catalyst induces asymmetry during the
alkylation process.
(9) Eisch, J. J. In ComprehensiVe Organometallic Chemistry; Wilkinson,
G., Stone, F. G. A., Abel, E. N., Eds.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1982;
Vol. 1, Chapter 6 and references therein.
(10) Ethylation of the nitrile was performed in the same manner as the
alkylation of the Schiff bases (see Supporting Information) except that the
quenching of the reaction mixture was carried out with 60 mL of 10%
hydrochloric acid instead of with NaOH.
(11) For typical examples, see: Molander, G. A. Chem. ReV. 1992, 92,
(4) Known products C6H5CH(CH3)NHC6H5,14 C6H5CH(C2H5)NHC6H5,15
29.
C6H5CH(C2H5)NHC6Hr-4-CH3,7,16 4-CH3-C6H4CH(C2H5)NHC6H5,7 and
(12) Hou, X. L.; Zheng, X. L.; Dai, L. X. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39,
6949.
7,17
4-Cl C6H4CH(C2H5)NHC6H5
were compared with authentic samples
prepared according to the procedures reported in the literature. Physical
data (bp/mp; 1H and 13C NMR; EI-mass spectra) and elemental analyses of
all new compounds, as well as the relevant data for known compounds
that are not documented in the literature, are presented in Supporting
Information.
(13) (a) Sigalov, A. B.; Rybakova, L. F.; Beletskaya, I. P. IzV. Akad.
Nauk SSSR, Ser. Khim. 1983, 1692. (b) Yokoo, K.; Fukagawa, T.;
Yamanaka, Y.; Taniguchi, H.; Fujiwara, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 3237.
(c) Collin, J.; Namy, J. L.; Bied, C.; Kagan, H. B. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1987,
140, 29. (d) Rybakova, L. F.; Syutkina, O. P.; Garber, A. V.; Petrov, E. S.
Zh. Obshch. Khim. 1988, 58, 1053. (e) Syutkina, O. P.; Rybakova, L. F.;
Petrov, E. S. Metallorg. Khim. 1989, 2, 1145. (f) Inamoto, T.; Hatajiama,
T.; Nishimura, S.; Togo, H.; Yokoyama, M. Kidorui 1990, 16, 3081; Chem.
Abstr. 1991, 114, 61235z. (g) Fujiwara, Y.; Tanikguchi, Y. Kikan. Kagaku
Sosaetsu 1998, 37, 63; Chem. Abstr. 1999, 129, 330287d. (h) Zheleznova,
T. A.; Bochkarev, L. N.; Safronova, A. V.; Zhil’tsov, S. F. Russ. J. Gen.
Chem. 1999, 69, 784.
(14) Busch, M. Ber. Deutsch. Chem. Ges. 1904, 37, 2691.
(15) Busch, M.; Rinck, A. Ber. Deutsch. Chem. Ges. 1905, 38, 1761.
(16) Heutling, A.; Doye, S. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 1961.
(17) Bertrand, M. P.; Feray, L.; Nouguier, R.; Perfetti, P. J. Org. Chem.
1999, 64, 9189.
(5) See, Gelman, D.; Ho¨hne, G.; Schumann, H.; Blum, J. Synthesis 2001,
591 and references therein.
(6) Calculation of the optical purity is based on the value of [R]25
)
D
26.1° reported by: Ogata, Y.; Takeuch, K. J. Org. Chem. 1970, 35, 1642.
For examples of the enantioselective addition of organoaluminums to
aldehydes, see: (a) Chan, A. S. C.; Zhang, F.-Y.; Yip, C.-W. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 4080. (b) Pagenkopf, B. L.; Carreira, E. M. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1998, 39, 9593. (c) Lu, J.-F.; You, J.-S.; Gau, H.-M. 2000, 11, 2531.
(7) Thomas, J.; Henry-Basch, E.; Fre´on, P. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1969,
109.
(8) Cf.: Gelman, D.; Schumann, H.; Blum, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000,
41, 7555.
1996
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 12, 2004