C O MMU N I C A T I O N S
Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan (15350105), and Research
Fellowships of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for
Young Scientists. We also thank Sumitomo Chemical Foundation
for the financial support.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details including
tyrosinase purification, the spectrum data of oxy-tyrosinase (S1), kinetic
data of the phenolase reaction (S2), and the kinetic equations based on
the detailed reaction scheme (S3) (PDF). This material is available free
of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
Figure 1. (A) Time course of O2-consumption in the tyrosinase-catalyzed
reaction in 0.5 M borate buffer (pH 9.0) (a) in the absence of NH2OH and
(1) (a) Solomon, E. I.; Sundaram, U. M.; Machonkin, T. E. Chem. ReV. 1996,
96, 2563-2605. (b) Land, E. J.; Ramsden, C. A.; Riley, P. A. Acc. Chem.
(b) in the presence of NH2OH (6.8 mM); [tyrosinase] ) 0.014 µM, [p-F-
Res. 2003, 36, 300-308.
C6H4OH] ) 30 µM, under air-saturated conditions at 25 °C. (B) Plot of V
vs [p-F-C6H4OH]. Inset: Hanes-Woolf plot ([p-F-C6H4OH]/V vs [p-F-
C6H4OH]).
(
2) (a) Solomon, E. I.; Chen, P.; Metz, M.; Lee, S.; Palmer, A. E. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4570-4590. (b) Decker, H.; Tuczek, F. Trends
Biochem. Sci. 2000, 25, 392-397. (c) Decker, H.; Dillinger, R.; Tuczek,
F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1591-1595. (d) van Gelder, C. W.;
Flurkey, W. H.; Wichers, H. J. Phytochemistry 1997, 45, 1309-1323.
(
e) Lerch, K. Life Chem. Rep. 1987, 5, 221-234.
(
(
3) Kitajima, N.; Fujisawa, K.; Moro-oka, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111,
8
975-8976.
4) (a) Wilcox, D. E.; Porras, A. G.; Hwang, Y. T.; Lerch, K.; Winker, M.
E.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 4015-4027. (b) S a´ nchez-
Ferrer, A.; Rodr ´ı gues-L o´ pez, J. N.; Garc ´ı a-C a´ novas, F.; Garc ´ı a-Carmona,
F. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1995, 1247, 1-11.
(
5) For recent kinetic studies on the phenolase and catecholase activities,
see: (a) Haghbeen, K.; Tan, E. W. Anal. Biochem. 2003, 312, 23-32.
(
b) Espin, J. C.; Var o´ n, R.; Fenoll, L. G.; Gilabert, M. A.; Garc ´ı a-Ruiz,
P. A.; Tudela, J.; Garc ´ı a-C a´ novas, F. Eur. J. Biochem. 2000, 267, 1270-
1
279. (c) Espin, J. C.; Garc ´ı a-Ruiz, P. A.; Tudela, J.; Var o´ n, R.; Garc ´ı a-
C a´ novas, F. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 2968-2975.
(
6) For spectroscopic approaches to the catalytic intermediates, see: (a) van
Gastel, M.; Bubacco, L.; Groenen, E. J. J.; Vijgenboom, E.; Canters, G.
W. FEBS Lett. 2000, 474, 228-232. (b) Bubacco, L.; Vijgenboom, E.;
Gobin, C.; Tepper, A. W. J. W.; Salgado, J.; Canters, G. W. J. Mol. Catal.
B: Enzym. 2000, 8, 27-35. (c) Bubacco, L.; Salgado, J.; Tepper, A. W.
J. W.; Vijgenboom, E.; Canters, G. W. FEBS Lett. 1999, 442, 215-220.
Figure 2. Plots of [log Vmax] (enzymatic reaction, closed circle) and [log
+
(7) For geometric discussions on each step in the catalytic mechanism, see:
a) Gerdemann, C.; Eicken, C.; Krebs, B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 183-
k] (model reaction, open circle) against σ values of the p-substituents.
(
1
91. (b) Klabunde, T.; Eicken, C.; Sacchettini, J. C.; Krebs, B. Nat. Struct.
Biol. 1998, 5, 1084-1090.
reaction has been evaluated by comparing the Hammett plot ([log
(
8) Karlin, K. D.; Hayes, J. C.; Gultneh, Y.; Cruse, R. W.; McKown, J. W.;
Hutchinson, J. P.; Zubieta, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 2121-2128.
9) Holland, P. L.; Rodgers, K. R.; Tolman, W. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
+
k] vs σ ) with that of the model reaction (Figure 2). The F value
(
(
the slope of the Hammett plot) of the enzymatic reaction (-2.4,
1
999, 38, 1139-1142.
2
10
R ) 0.98) is fairly close to that of our model reaction (-1.8)
(
10) (a) Itoh, S.; Kumei, H.; Taki, M.; Nagatomo, S.; Kitagawa, T.; Fukuzumi,
S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6708-6709. (b) Itoh, S.; Fukuzumi, S.
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2002, 75, 2081-2095.
and that of the aromatic ligand hydroxylation reaction reported by
Karlin and co-workers (-2.1).17 The negatively small F values of
both the enzymatic and model reactions clearly demonstrated that
the phenolase reaction of tyrosinase proceeds via the same
mechanism as that of the model reaction, that is, an electrophilic
aromatic substitution mechanism.5,18
In summary, we have successfully constructed a very simple
enzymatic reaction system that allows us to perform a quantitative
evaluation of the phenolase activity of tyrosinase for the first time.
One of the key features of the present system is the exclusion of
catechols from the catalytic cycle by using borate anion as the
trapping agent (Scheme 1). In the absence of borate anion (in a
nonborate buffer), catechols, the primary oxidation product of
phenols, may be further oxidized to the corresponding o-quinones
at the active site of met-tyrosinase as reported previously.1b In the
presence of high concentration of borate anion (0.5 M), however,
the primary oxidation product catechol may be withdrawn from
the active site before being oxidized to the o-quinone. This means
that the catechol release by the complex formation with borate anion
is fast enough to prevent such the over oxidation of catechols.
(
11) (a) Santagostini, L.; Gullotti, M.; Monzani, E.; Casella, L.; Dillinger, R.;
Tuczek, F. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 519-522. (b) Mirica, L. M.; Vance,
M.; Rudd, D. J.; Hedman, B.; Hodgson, K. O.; Solomon, E. I.; Stack, T.
D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9332-9333.
(12) Itoh, S. In ComprehensiVe Coordination Chemistry-II; Que, L., Jr., Tolman,
W. B., Eds; Elsevier: Oxford, 2003. In press.
(
13) When hydrogen peroxide was added into a solution of met-tyrosinase,
the absorption band at 345 nm due to oxy-tyrosinase was generated (Figure
S1). However, the absorption band readily disappeared when the solution
was degassed. Thus, we could not perform single-turnover kinetic analysis
on the reaction between oxy-tyrosinase and phenols.
(
14) (a) For reviews, see: James, T. D.; Sandanayake, K. R. A. S.; Shinkai, S.
Supramol. Chem. 1995, 6, 141-157. (b) Mochizuki, M.; Yamazaki, S.;
Kano, K.; Ikeda, T. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2002, 1569, 35-44.
15) The low yield of catechol product may be due to nonenzymatic side
reactions such as a quinone-induced polymerization of catechols and a
(
reaction of the product (and/or the substrate) with oxidized NH
2
OH. It is,
however, apparent that the enzymatic over oxidation of catechols to the
quinones is not involved, since the catechol oxidation does not proceed
at all in the present borate buffer system.
(16) The detailed kinetic analysis is presented in Supporting Information (S3).
17) Nasir, M. S.; Cohen, B. I.; Karlin, K. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114,
482-2494.
(
2
(18) Rate-dependence on the oxidation potentials of phenols in the present
enzymatic reaction is totally different from that observed in the oxidation
reaction of neutral phenols (phenoxyl radical formation) by the peroxo
complex which proceeds via a proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET)
mechanism: Osako, T.; Ohkubo, K.; Taki, M.; Tachi, Y.; Fukuzumi, S.;
Itoh, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11027-11033.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported in part by Grants-
in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education,
JA036425D
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 125, NO. 43, 2003 13035