A Fluorescent Sensor for Anions
76 82
trometer, using quartz sample tubes (path length:1 cm). NMR spectra
were recorded on a Bruker Avance 400 spectrometer, operating at 9.37 T.
Spectrophotometric titrations were performed at 258C on 5î10À4 m solu-
tions of the ligand (1 or 2) in MeCN. Aliquotes of a fresh R4NX (R=
alkyl) standard solution were added and the UV/Vis spectra of the
sample were recorded. All spectrophotometric titration curves were
fitted with the HYPERQUAD program.[8] Spectrofluorimetric titrations
were carried out by adding a standard solution of the anion to a 2î
10À6 m solution of the ligand (the experiments were also repeated at
higher concentration, 10À5 m). In each spectrofluorimetric titration, the
excitation of the sample was performed at the wavelength value at which
only negligible variations of absorbance occurred.
1H NMR titrations were carried out as described before, but using
CD3CN as the solvent and working with high concentrations of the recep-
tor (>7î10À4 m).
Synthesis of 1:MeI (0.12 mL, 1.9 mmol) was added to a solution of 6-
methoxyquinoline (0.3 g, 1.88 mmol) in dry CHCl3 (5 mL). The mixture
was then heated at reflux for 1 h, under a dinitrogen atmosphere. A
yellow solid (1¥IÀ) was collected by filtration and washed with several
portions of Et2O. The crude product was dissolved in hot water and treat-
Scheme 1.
al to their observed lifetime in the presence of quencher [Eqs. (3a) and
(4a)]:
À
ed with an aqueous saturated solution of NH4PF6. 1¥PF6 precipitated as
1
a white solid (0.41 g, 77%). H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD, TMS): d=9.15
t0
(d, 1H, arom.), 9.08 (d, 1H, arom.), 8.42 (d, 1H, arom.), 8.01 (dd, 1H,
arom.), 7.90 (dd, 1H, arom.), 7.80 (d, 1H, arom.), 4.68 (s, 3H, N+ÀCH3),
4.10 ppm (s, 3H, OÀCH3); elemental analysis calcd (%) for C11H12NOPF6
(319.1):C 41.40, H 3.79, N 4.38; found:C 41.05, H 3.90, N 4.23.
IfðMÞ
/
½M
ð3aÞ
ð4aÞ
1 þ KSV½Q
t00
IfðMQÞ
/
½MQ
1 þ K0SV½Q
Synthesis of 2:A solution of 6-methoxyquinoline (0.3 g, 1.9 mmol) in ace-
tonitrile (20 mL) was added dropwise to a refluxing solution of 2,4,6-tris-
(bromomethyl)mesitylene (0.2 g, 0.5 mmol) in acetonitrile (40 mL). The
reaction was followed by TLC (silica gel, CH2Cl2/MeOH 8:0.5; Rf =0.1).
After 24 hrs at reflux, the solvent was removed by rotary evaporation
[MT] is the total concentration of the fluorescent receptor 2 (i.e., [MT]=
[M] + [MQ]). From this, I0, the steady-state fluorescence in the absence
of Q, can be obtained from Equation (3a) considering that [M]=[MT]
[Eq. (5a)]:
and the crude product was washed with CH3CN, then with Et2O and pu-
IfðMÞ / t0½MT
ð5 aÞ
À
rified by recrystallisation. Anion exchange yielded 0.35 g (65%) 2¥3PF6
.
1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD, TMS): d=9.11 (d, 1H, arom.), 8.77 (d, 1H,
arom.), 8.75 (d, 1H, arom.), 8.08 (dd, 1H, arom.), 8.01 (dd, 1H, arom.),
7.88 (d, 1H, arom.), 6.40 (s, 2H, N+ÀCH2), 4.10 (s, 3H, OÀCH3),
2.28 ppm (s, 3H, ArÀCH3); elemental analysis calcd (%) for
C42H42N3O3P3F18 (1071.4):C 47.08, H 3.95, N 3.92; found:C 46.80, H
4.15, N 3.73.
In the presence of Q the global fluorescence intensity (If) is the sum of
that of species and MQ; thus, from Equations (3a) (5a), Equa-
tion (6a) can be obtained:
M
I
fðMÞ þ IfðMQÞ
If
1
½M
t00=t0
½MQ
¼
¼
þ
ð6 aÞ
1 þ KSV½Q ½MT 1 þ K0SV½Q ½MT
I0
I0
The ratio t00/t0 can be indicated as the relative fluorescence intensity of
species MQ and M, namely 1. If M and MQ are at equilibrium, their con-
centration is ruled by the equilibrium constant (Kass), [Q] and [MT]. The
total Q concentration ([QT]) is:[Q T]=[Q] + [MQ]. Treating the fraction
of Q bound to M as negligible with respect to free Q ([MQ]![Q]), that
is, considering a low affinity equilibrium, the mass balance gives rise to
Equations (6b) and (6c):
Appendix
Derivation of the equations for the fluorescence intensity in the presence
of dynamic quenchingand partial static quenching :The here reported
approach considers the possibility for the molecule M to form, at the
ground state, a 1:1 complex (MQ) with the non-fluorescent species Q.
Both M and MQ are fluorescent and both excited states (M* and MQ*)
undergo dynamic quenching by species Q, according to Scheme 1, in
which (M*¥¥¥Q) and (MQ*¥¥¥¥Q) are the pair between Q and M* and
MQ* responsible for the dynamic quenching.
½M
1
ð6 bÞ
ð6 cÞ
¼
½MT 1 þ Kass½Q
½MQ
½MT
Kass½Q
The decay of species M* and MQ* are described by the Equations (1a)
and (2a):
¼
1 þ Kass½Q
ꢀ
ꢁ
These can be substituted into Equation (6a) to give Equation (7a):
*
d½M
1
t0
1 þ kQt0½Q
1 þ KSV½Q
*
*
*
¼ À
þ kQ½Q ½M ¼ À
½M ¼ À
½M
dt
t0
t0
ꢀ
ꢁ
If
I0
1
1
1Kass½Q
ð1 aÞ
¼
þ
ð7 aÞ
1 þ Kass½Q 1 þ KSV½Q 1 þ K0SV½Q
ꢀ
ꢁ
1 þ k0Qt00½Q
1 þ K0SV½Q
*
d½MQ
1
þ k0Q½Q ½MQ ¼ À
½MQ ¼ À
½MQ
*
*
*
¼ À
t00
t00
t00
Taking the I0/If ratio, as in the Stern Volmer relation, and assuming that
the Stern Volmer constants for M and for MQ do not differ significantly
(KSV ꢀK0SV) Equation (7a) can be reduced to Equation (8a):
dt
ð2 aÞ
in which t0 and t00, kQ and kQ0 , KSV (=kQ ît0) and KS0 V (=k0Q ît00 ) are the
excited state lifetimes, the dynamic quenching rate constants and the
Stern Volmer constants for the species M and MQ, respectively. Both
equations were formulated by applying the Stern Volmer approach[1] and
considering the quenching rate constants as time-independent. The
I0 ð1 þ Kass½QÞð1 þ KSV½QÞ
¼
ð8 aÞ
If
1 þ 1Kass½Q
Within the approximation indicated (i.e., [MQ]![Q]), Equation (8a) re-
produces the fluorescence pattern reported in Scheme 1. It must be
noted that when species MQ is not fluorescent (1=0), Equation (8a) re-
steady-state fluorescence intensity of species M (If(M)) and MQ (If(MQ)
are directly proportional to their concentration and inversely proportion-
)
81
Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 76 82
¹ 2004 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim