QSAR Analysis of Drug–CYP 3A4 Interaction
1407
methods for modeling cytochrome p450 active sites. Drug Metab.
Dispos. 29:936–944 (2001).
philicity (log D7.4), especially when N-containing heterocyclic
compounds and others are analyzed individually. We ana-
lyzed our data in the same manner for 31 compounds, of
which log D7.4 values were available from the literature (31–
34). Weak correlations were observed, with the r values of
0.67 and 0.65 for N-containing heterocyclic compounds (n ס
13) and others (n ס
18), respectively. However, these r values
were not so high as those from our model (r ס
0.88, n ס
35).
An advantage of QSAR models based on two dimen-
sional topological descriptors is that they eliminate the con-
formational and alignment ambiguities inherent within a 3D-
QSAR process. Additionally, the two-dimensional topologi-
cal descriptors are less computationally intensive, practically
completely automated, and have been used to produce highly
predictive models that are comparable to, or better than,
those obtained using 3D-QSAR approaches (26). The most
limiting feature of any 2D-QSAR approach is its insensitivity
to the stereochemistry of the members of the training and
prediction data sets and the lack of easily interpretable infor-
mation useful for the design of new highly active drugs. In
contrast, three-dimensional approaches provide graphic rep-
resentations of pharmacophores (35) or putative receptor
sites (36) and indicate the best directions for rational design.
In view of this and the fact that two-dimensional approaches
would be very helpful in screening a large number of virtual
compounds, it appears that 2D- and 3D-QSAR analyses
complement each other according to the purposes of the dif-
ferent screening stages.
8. D. F. V. Lewis and B. G Lake. Molecular modelling of CYP 1A
subfamily members based on an alignment with CYP 102: Ratio-
nalization of CYP 1A substrate specificity in terms of active site
amino acid residues. Xenobiotica 26:723–753 (1996).
9. G. D. Szklarz and J. R. Halpert. Molecular modeling of cyto-
chrome P450 3A4. J. Comp. Aided. Mol. Des. 11:265–272 (1997).
10. S. Ekins, G. Bravi, J. H. Wikel, and S. A. Wrighton. Three-
dimensional quantitative structure activity relationship analysis
of cytochrome P-450 3A4 substrates. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
291:424–433 (1999).
11. S. Ekins, G. Bravi, S. Binkley, J. S. Gillespie, B. J. Ring, J. H.
Wikel, and S. A. Wrighton. Three- and four-dimensional quanti-
tative structure activity relationship analyses of cytochrome
P-450 3A4 inhibitors. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 290:429–438
(1999).
12. D. F. Lewis, S. Modi, and M. Dickins. Structure-activity relation-
ship for human cytochrome P450 substrates and inhibitors. Drug
Metab. Rev. 34:69–82 (2002).
13. K. R. Korzekwa, N. Krishnamachary, M. Shou, A. Ogai, R. A.
Parise, A. E. Rettie, F. J. Gonzalez, and T. S. Tracy. Evaluation
of atypical cytochrome P450 kinetics with two-substrate models:
evidence that multiple substrates can simultaneously bind to cy-
tochrome P450 active sites. Biochemistry 37:4137–4147 (1998).
14. J. J. Huuskonen, A. E. P. Villa, and I. V. Tetko. Prediction of
partition coefficient based on atom-type electrotopological state
indices. J. Pharm. Sci. 88:229–233 (1999).
15. L. H. Hall and C. T. Story. Boiling point and critical temperature
of a heterogeneous data set: QSAR with atom type electrotopo-
logical state indices using artificial neural networks. J. Chem. Inf.
Comp. Sci. 36:1004–1014 (1996).
16. S. Wanchana, F. Yamashita, and M. Hashida. Quantitative struc-
ture/property relationship analysis on aqueous solubility using
genetic algorithm-combined partial least squares method.
Pharmazie 57:127–129 (2002).
17. F. Yamashita, S. Wanchana, and M. Hashida. Quantitative struc-
ture/property relationship analysis of Caco-2 permeability using a
genetic algorithm-based partial least squares method. J. Pharm.
Sci. 90:2230–2239 (2002).
18. L. B. Kier and L. H. Hall. Topological information. In L. B. Kier
and L. H. Hall (eds.), Molecular Connectivity in Structure-Activity
Analysis. Research Studies, Hertfordshire, 1986, pp. 43–68.
19. W. Bridge, A. J. Crocker, T. Cubin, and A. Robertson. Experi-
ments on the synthesis of rotenone and its derivatives. Part XIII.
J Chem. Soc. 1530–1535 (1937).
20. A. P. Li, D. L. Kaminski, and A. Rasmussen. Substrates of hu-
man hepatic cytochrome P450 3A4. Toxicology 104:1–8 (1995).
21. L. B. Kier and L. H. Hall. Intermolecular accessibility: the mean-
ing of molecular connectivity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 40:792–
795 (2000).
In conclusion, the proposed model, in which two-
dimensional topological descriptors are used as molecular de-
scriptors, is able to predict drug–CYP 3A4 interactions with
reasonable accuracy. Genetic algorithm-based approaches
would be useful in selecting a set of effective descriptors for
QSAR modeling.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid
for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Cul-
ture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.
REFERENCES
22. L. H. Hall and L. B. Kier. The E-state as the basis for molecular
structure space definition and structure similarity. J. Chem. Inf.
Comput. Sci. 40:784–791 (2000).
23. A. Varhe, K. T. Olkkola, and P. J. Neuvonen. Oral triazolam is
potentially hazardous to patients receiving systemic antimycotics
ketoconazole or itraconazole. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 56:601–607
(1994).
1. F. P. Guengerich. Role of cytochrome P450 enzymes in drug-drug
interactions. Adv. Pharmacol. 43:7–35 (1997).
2. M. F. Paine, M. Khalighi, J. M. Fisher, D. D. Shen, K. L. Kunze,
C. L. Marsh, J. D. Perkins, and K. E. Thummel. Characterization
of interintestinal and intraintestinal variations in human CYP
3A-dependent metabolism. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 283:1552–
1562 (1997).
3. P. K. Honig, D. C. Wortham, K. Zamani, D. Conner, J. C. Mullin,
and L. R. Cantilena. Terfenadine–ketonazole interaction. JAMA
269:1513–1518 (1993).
4. D. M. Stresser, A. P. Blanchard, S. D. Turner, J. C. L. Erve, A. A.
Dandeneau, V. P. Miller, and C. L. Crespi. Substrate-dependent
modulation of CYP 3A4 catalytic activity: analysis of 27 test com-
pounds with four fluorometric substrates. Drug Metab. Dispos.
28:1440–1448 (2000).
24. P. Geladi and B. R. Kowalski. Partial least-squares regression: a
tutorial. Anal. Chim. Acta 185:1–17 (1986).
25. K. Hasegawa, Y. Miyashita, and K. Funatsu. GA strategy for
variable selection in QSAR studies: GA-based PLS analysis of
calcium channel antagonists. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 37:306–
310 (1997).
26. B. Hoffman, S. J. Cho, W. Zheng, S. Wyrick, D. E. Nichols, R. B.
Mailman, and A. Tropsha. Quantitative structure activity rela-
tionship modeling of dopamine D1 antagonists using comparative
molecular field analysis, genetic algorithms–partial least squares,
and K nearest neighbor methods. J. Med. Chem. 42:3217–3226
(1999).
5. C. M. Masimirembwa, R. Thompson, and T. B. Andersson. In
vitro high throughput screening of compounds for favorable
metabolic properties in drug discovery. Comb. Chem. High
Throughput Screen. 4:245–263 (2001).
27. D. E. Goldberg. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and
Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, New York, 1989.
28. C. Hansch. Quantitative relationships between lipophilic charac-
ter and drug metabolism. Drug Metab. Rev. 1:1–14 (1972).
29. R. P. Austin, P. Barton, S. L. Cockroft, and M. C. Wenlock. The
6. J. Langowski and A. Long. Computer systems for the prediction
of xenobiotic metabolism. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 54:407–415
(2002).
7. S. Ekins, M. J. de Groot, and J. P. Jones. Pharmacophore and
three-dimensional quantitative structure activity relationship