D. Wodka et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 47 (2006) 1825–1828
1827
mode electrospray and a weaker di-sodiated m/z of the
parent ion in positive mode electrospray. Intermediate
2a (R1 = phenyl, Table 1) was purified by HPLC and
further characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and
HRMS. All data were consistent with the proposed
structure 2 in Scheme 1. Frequently, we also observed
another smaller UV and mass signal in the LCMS cor-
responding to the sodiated ion of the acyl urethanes 3.
The acyl urethanes of entries 2a,b were also purified
A limited set of experiments was done to optimize the
experimental conditions for acyl urea formation. Longer
reactions led to product degradation, higher and lower
temperatures resulted in decreased purity. Conventional
heating gave comparable ratios of amides and corre-
sponding acyl ureas for aryl acids but higher amide
ratios for alkyl acids (data not shown). In general micro-
wave heating appeared to deliver somewhat higher
yields. The acyl urea products of primary amines for
most (especially aryl) entries precipitate in acetonitrile
upon cooling. To achieve a generally applicable parallel
process the solvent was stripped off and the residue was
dissolved in DMSO for preparative HPLC purification.
The ratio for the isolated products was verified by analy-
sis of the LCMS UV spectra of the crude mixtures
using the purified samples as controls for normalization.
We made no attempt to further optimize the reaction
conditions or workup procedures for the individual en-
tries, although, some sensitive functional groups (such
as hydroxyl, amino, or Boc) may clearly benefit from
custom conditions.
1
and the structures were confirmed by matching the H
NMR spectrum to that in the literature.
The ratio of the acyl urea and amide products in our
experience is governed by the relative rates of conversion
of intermediate 2 to either the corresponding amide 4 or
urethane 3. Amide formation for the more reactive alkyl
carboxylic acids is much faster and cleaner than that for
aryl acids. The same effect in route (b) in Scheme 1
results in a significant amount of amide by-product for
alkyl acids as the temperature ramp-up time is sufficient
to convert a large portion of 2 to the amides. To confirm
this hypothesis, purified 3a was heated under conditions
identical to route (b). Clean conversion to acyl urea 5a
without any detectable amide formation was observed
by LCMS. In addition, the rearrangement required for
conversion of 2 to 3 was easily blocked by two ortho
methyl groups in entry 5j and thus only traces of the acyl
urea could be isolated along with the amide product.
This rearrangement is proposed to be analogous to the
one required for the formation of methyl carbamates
from primary alcohols.5 Little amide formation is
observed for unhindered aryl acids under the standard
conditions toward acyl ureas. No amide could be
detected, however with the hindered tert-butylamine
(5d), which further substantiates the mechanism put
forth herein. Amides cannot typically be synthesized in
reactions of similar hindered nucleophiles and active
esters such as p-nitrophenyl or pentafluorophenyl esters.
It was also important to verify that the route to acyl
ureas 5 does not go through amides 4 due to the amine
reacting with a decomposition product of Burgess
reagent. To that extent, we heated crude amide mixtures
obtained at 80–150 °C but no acyl ureas were detected.
The method is rather insensitive to the electronic and
steric nature of the nucleophile in preparation of the
acyl ureas (Table 1). Both electron rich and electron
deficient aryl amines and alkyl amines work equally
well. In fact, less reactive amines lead to higher acyl urea
ratios as route (c) toward amides is shut down. On the
other hand, significant steric hindrance on the acid
blocks the conversion of 2 to acyl urethanes as exempli-
fied by entry 5j. No significant conversion to amides
takes place with amines of low nucleophilicity. Both pri-
mary and secondary amines react equally well and no
significant electronic effect on the acid side was observed
in either routes (b) and (c). The failure of pyrrole-2-car-
boxylic acid (5l) signals that the known high reactivity of
the Burgess reagent with amines and alcohols does
require these functional groups present in the carboxylic
acid be protected. Boc protection was tolerated in the
microwave under both routes (b) and (c) conditions.
Route (c) leads to no acyl urea products albeit amides
for aryl acids were found to be contaminated by variable
O
2
O
O
O
O
S
O
O
b
a
R1
O
N
O
R1
OH
O
R1
N
H
O
O O
S
NH
N
N
O
1
3
6
R2R3NH
O
R2R3NH
R2R3NH
O
c
b
b
O
4
R1
N
NR2R3
R1
NR2R3
H
4
5
Scheme 1. Reaction of carboxylic acids with Burgess reagent and amines. Reagents and conditions: (a) acetonitrile (1 mL/0.1 mmol acid), DIPEA
(1.5 equiv), 5 min at rt; Burgess reagent (6, 1.4 equiv), 5 min at rt; 15 min at 80 °C (lw); (b) R2R3NH (1.5 equiv), 8 min at 150 °C (lw); (c) R2R3NH
(3 equiv), 1 h at 80 °C (lw).