K.-i. Shimizu et al. / Journal of Catalysis 300 (2013) 242–250
249
propoxide groups on alumina, (CH3)2CDAOAl [2]. A weak band at
metal-free and ligand-free catalysts for hydrogen-transfer-type
reactions.
2174 cmꢀ1 may be assigned to
a-CAD stretching of a different type
of 2-propoxide. The band at 2104 cmꢀ1 due to the CAD bond of
(CH3)2CDAOAl species decreased with time, and a new band due
to adsorbed acetone (1700 cmꢀ1) increased. This is direct evidence
of Ni-catalyzed CAD bond dissociation of the (CH3)2CDAOAl spe-
cies (Eq. (2)).
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a ‘‘Grant for Advanced Industrial
Technology Development’’ in 2011 from the New Energy and
Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) and a
MEXT program ‘‘Elements Strategy Initiative to Form Core Re-
search Center’’ (since 2012), Japan. The authors thank Naomichi
Imaiida (Nagoya University) for his contributions in the prelimin-
ary experiments.
Kinetic analysis of the conversion of the 2-propoxide groups
was undertaken using time-resolved IR data (Fig. 7). The relative
amounts of (CH3)2CHAOAl and (CH3)2CDAOAl species were esti-
mated from the changes in the area of the IR band in the ranges
1080–1210 cmꢀ1 and 1100–1250 cmꢀ1
, respectively, because
these bands had the least overlap with other bands. As shown
in Fig. 8, the first-order plots of the 2-propoxide group during
its conversion to acetone gave fairly good straight lines. The
first-order rate constants of 2-propoxide consumption were esti-
mated to be 3.4 ꢃ 10ꢀ3 and 1.7 ꢃ 10ꢀ3 sꢀ1 for (CH3)2CHAOAl
and (CH3)2CDAOAl species, respectively. The kinetic isotope effect
(kH/kD) at 60 °C was estimated to be 2.0, corresponding to the dif-
ference in the activation energies of 1.9 kJ molꢀ1. This value is
lower than the zero-point energy difference (3.7 kJ molꢀ1) in
Appendix A. Supplementary material
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References
[1] F. Alonso, P. Riente, M. Yus, Acc. Chem. Res. 44 (2011) 379–391.
[2] K. Shimizu, K. Sugino, K. Sawabe, A. Satsuma, Chem. Eur. J. 15 (2009) 2341–
2351.
[3] K. Shimizu, K. Sawabe, A. Satsuma, Catal. Sci. Technol. 1 (2011) 331–341.
[4] K. Shimura, K. Shimizu, Green Chem. 14 (2012) 2983–2985.
[5] C. Parmeggiani, F. Cardona, Green Chem. 14 (2012) 547–564.
[6] T. Mallat, A. Baiker, Chem. Rev. 104 (2004) 3037–3058.
[7] T. Matsumoto, M. Ueno, N. Wang, S. Kobayashi, Chem. Asian J. 3 (2008) 196–
214.
[8] N. Dimitratos, J.A. Lopez-Sanchez, G.J. Hutchings, Chem. Sci. 3 (2012) 20–44.
[9] K. Mori, K. Yamaguchi, T. Hara, T. Mizugaki, K. Ebitani, K. Kaneda, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 124 (2002) 11572–11573.
[10] K. Yamaguchi, N. Mizuno, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41 (2002) 4538–4542.
[11] S. Mori, M. Takubo, K. Makida, T. Yanase, S. Aoyagi, T. Maegawa, Y. Monguchi,
H. Sajiki, Chem. Commun. 45 (2009) 5159–5161.
[12] Y.M.A. Yamada, T. Arakawa, H. Hocke, Y. Uozumi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46
(2007) 704–706.
[13] A. Abad, A. Corma, H. Garcia, Chem. Eur. J. 14 (2008) 212–222.
[14] H. Tsunoyama, N. Ichikuni, H. Sakurai, T. Tsukuda, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (2009)
7086–7093.
[15] B.M. Choudary, M.L. Kantam, A. Rahman, C.V. Reddy, K.K. Rao, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 40 (2001) 763–766.
[16] C. Li, H. Kawada, X. Sun, H. Xu, Y. Yoneyama, N. Tsubaki, ChemCatChem 3
(2011) 684–689.
[17] V.R. Choudhary, P.A. Chaudhari, V.S. Narkhede, Catal. Commun. 4 (2003) 171–
175.
[18] H. Ji, T. Wang, M. Zhang, Q. Chen, X. Gao, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett. 90 (2007)
251–257.
[19] T. Kawabata, Y. Shinozuka, Y. Ohishi, T. Shishido, K. Takaki, K. Takehira, J. Mol.
Catal. A 236 (2005) 206–215.
[20] H. Ji, T. Wang, M. Zhang, Y. She, L. Wang, Appl. Catal. A 282 (2005) 25–30.
[21] R.J. Angelici, ACS Catal. 1 (2011) 772–776.
[22] T.C. Johnson, D.J. Morris, M. Wills, Chem. Soc. Rev. 39 (2010) 81–88.
[23] S. Shinoda, T. Kojima, Y. Saito, J. Mol. Catal. 18 (1983) 99–104.
[24] G.B.W.L. Ligthart, R.H. Meijer, M.P.J. Donners, J. Meuldijk, J.A.J.M. Vekemans,
L.A. Hulshof, Tetrahedron Lett. 44 (2003) 1507–1509.
[25] G.R.A. Adair, J.M.J. Williams, Tetrahedron Lett. 46 (2005) 8233–8235.
[26] H. Junge, M. Beller, Tetrahedron Lett. 46 (2005) 1031–1034.
[27] S. Shahane, C. Fischmeister, C. Bruneau, Catal. Sci. Technol. 2 (2012) 1425–
1428.
[28] J. Zhang, M. Gandelman, L.J.W. Shimon, H. Rozenberg, D. Milstein,
Organometallics 23 (2004) 4026–4033.
[29] M. Nielsen, A. Kammer, D. Cozzula, H. Junge, S. Gladiali, M. Beller, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 50 (2011) 9593–9597.
a
-CAH (2722 cmꢀ1) and
a
-CAD (2104 cmꢀ1) in the IR spectra.
This indicates that the rate-determining step of 2-propoxide
conversion to acetone is the cleavage of the
other kinetically relevant steps may also exist.
a-CAH bond, but
Based on the mechanistic experiments on the dehydrogenation
of alcohols by Ni/h-Al2O3, a reaction mechanism is presented in
Fig. 9. Initially, a basic AlAOdꢀ group of alumina abstracts a proton
from alcohol to afford an alkoxide group on an adjacent Ald+ site
(Lewis acid site) and a proton on the AlAOdꢀ site (AlAOHd+). An
alkoxide at the interface between the Ni NP and alumina under-
goes hydride abstraction to yield hydride species on Ni (NiAH)
and acetone as the rate-determining step. Then, the NiAH species
undergoes protolysis by a neighboring AlAOHd+ site to release H2
gas, accompanied by the regeneration of the Ni0 site and the basic
AlAOdꢀ site of alumina. On the basis of the proposed mechanism,
the strong effect of support acid–base nature on the Ni-catalyzed
alcohol dehydrogenation (Fig. 3) can be explained as follows. The
abstraction of protons in alcohol by the metal oxide surface re-
quires basic sites. Thus, on the Ni-loaded acidic oxides (Nb2O5,
SnO2), dissociative adsorption of 2-propanol is limited by the weak
nucleophilic character of the metal oxide surface. On the other
hand, the protonic (electrophilic) nature of the OH groups on the
basic oxides (CaO, MgO) is weaker than that on the amphoteric
oxide (alumina), and the protolysis of NiAHdꢀ species with an adja-
cent OH group is slow.
4. Conclusions
Alumina-supported Ni metal NP was found to act as a heteroge-
neous and reusable catalyst for the acceptor-free oxidation of sec-
ondary alcohols. Among various supports, amphoteric supports
(such as alumina) having both acidic and basic sites gave higher
activity than acidic and basic supports. The TOF per surface Ni in-
creases with decreasing Ni particle size. These results suggest that
low-coordinated Ni0 sites and the metal/support interface play
important roles in the catalytic cycle. On the basis of in situ IR
and kinetic experiments, the following mechanism is proposed:
[30] K.-I. Fujita, N. Tanino, R. Yamaguchi, Org. Lett. 9 (2007) 109–111.
[31] K.-I. Fujita, T. Yoshida, Y. Imori, R. Yamaguchi, Org. Lett. 13 (2011) 2278–2281.
[32] S. Musa, I. Shaposhnikov, S. Cohen, D. Gelman, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50 (2011)
3533–3537.
[33] M. Yamashita, K. Kawamura, M. Suzuki, Y. Saito, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 64 (1991)
272–278.
[34] J.H. Choi, N. Kim, Y.J. Shin, J.H. Park, J. Park, Tetrahedron Lett. 45 (2004) 4607–
4610.
[35] W.H. Kim, I.S. Park, J. Park, Org. Lett. 8 (2006) 2543–2545.
[36] T. Mitsudome, Y. Mikami, H. Funai, T. Mizugaki, K. Jitsukawa, K. Kaneda,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47 (2008) 138–141.
[37] W. Fang, Q. Zhang, J. Chen, W. Deng, Y. Wang, Chem. Commun. 46 (2010)
1547–1549.
[38] Q. Zhang, W. Deng, Y. Wang, Chem. Commun. 47 (2011) 9275–9292.
[39] W. Fang, J. Chen, Q. Zhang, W. Deng, Y. Wang, Chem. Eur. J. 17 (2011) 1247–
1256.
(1) reaction of an alcohol with the Lewis acid (Ald+)–base (AlAOdꢀ
)
pair site of alumina yields an alkoxide on the Ald+ site and a proton
on the AlAOdꢀ site, (2) CAH dissociation of the alkoxide by Ni0 site
to form NiAH and ketone, (3) protolysis of NiAH by a neighboring
proton to release H2 gas, accompanied by the regenerations of the
Ni0 site and the basic AlAOdꢀ site of alumina. Fundamental infor-
mation in this study will be useful as a design concept for noble