Inorganic Chemistry
Article
clusters, activated MOFs, etc.33−36 At this time, catalytic
cycloaddition of CO2 under wild conditions is the most
economic and convenient treatment method by the trans-
formation of epoxides into cyclic carbonates, which could be
further economically applied in the industrial fields of nontoxic
aprotic solvent, raw material of polymer, pharmaceutical and
pesticide intermediates, battery electrolyte, etc.37−39 Among all
porous MOF materials, Ln-MOFs are one of the most efficient
and sustainable heterogeneous catalysts because Ln3+ cations
own rich empty electronic orbitals and a strong affinity for
large dipole-moment CO2 molecules,40−42 whereas, hitherto,
most of the reported Ln-MOFs were usually self-assembled
from mixed ligands and lack solvent-accessible voids and
structural stability. Therefore, in order to pursue the
applicability of Ln-MOFs in a comparatively complicated
environment, the strict demand for strong skeletons is
necessary. Moreover, with an increase in the length of ligands,
for the class of Ln-MOFs, it is almost inevitable that a decrease
of the skeleton stability or a decrease of the porosity is caused
by interpenetration. Thus, so far, optimization research on the
catalytic platform of Ln-MOFs with respect to the surface area,
porosity, pore size, and adsorption capacity is still relatively
scarce compared to all reported MOFs, which may be
attributed to the laborious crystallization and related structure
characterization due to the highly pluralistic coordination
number and equivocal directionality of Ln3+.43,44
Furthermore, as for Ln-MOFs, the luminescence perform-
ance could be effectively enhanced by the “antenna effect” of
aromatic ligands with energy transfer (ET) of π−π* and n−π*,
by which the disadvantageous of the outer-electron distribu-
tion features of Ln3+ ions could be overcome. In recent years,
with the application of favorably designed π-conjugated
polycarboxyl acids as illuminants, a lot of bimetallic doped
EuxTb1−x MOFs were reported because modulation of the ET
by adjustments to the Tb3+ and Eu3+ contents could offer new
single-molecule white materials and probes for guest molecules
or metal cations baseed on the principle of light switching.
In view of the comparisons of documented MOFs built from
separate organic ligands of 1,3-bis(2,4-dicarboxylphenyl)-
benzene, 2,6-bis(2,4-dicarboxylphenyl)pyridine, 1,3,5-benzene-
tricarboxylic acid, and 1,3,5-(4-carboxylphenyl)benzene, the
large sizes of the organic ligands could increase the MOF
characteristics of surface area, porosity, pore size, and
adsorption capacity, and more carboxyl groups could enhance
the MOF stability.45,46 When the advantages of the above-
mentioned four organic ligands were combined, the
hexacarboxylic acid of 4,4′,4″-(pyridine-2,4,6-triyl)tris(1,3-
benzenedicarboxylic acid) (H6PTTBA) was successfully
synthesized by our research group for the first time. On the
basis of the considerations of the above-mentioned application,
the acidic solvothermal reaction of Ln2O3 and H6PTTBA in
the mixed solvent of N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF)/H2O
generated a series of 3D nanoporous LnIII−organic frame-
works: {(Me2NH2)[Ln3(PTTBA)2]·xDMF·yH2O}n, which
proved that H6PTTBA was an excellent organic linker for
the construction of MOFs with large surface area, high
porosity, and pore size and anticipated adsorption capacity
under convenient hydrothermal conditions. Herein, the Eu-
based framework of {(Me2NH2)[Ln3(PTTBA)2]·4DMF·
3H2O}n (1-Eu) was taken as one representative to discuss in
detail. Structural analysis of 1-Eu confirmed that H6PTTBA
had the following several characteristics: (i) enriched carboxyl
groups could catch enough cations/secondary building units
(SBUs) to form a wall of nanotubes or nanocages; (ii) the
torsion angle between aromatic planes among one H6PTTBA
could range from 0 to 90° and further facilitate the SBU-based
framework construction; (iii) under certain suitable conditions,
the N-heterocycle could serve as a negative charge
compensator to reduce the electronegativity of the MOF by
the protonation of a nitrogen atom or as a Lewis basic site to
prompt the special catalytic reaction.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
■
Materials and General Methods. All of the starting reagents and
solvents were commercially available without further purification.
Elemental analyses were performed using a CE instruments (model
EA 1110 elemental analyzer). Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) data
were collected on a Panalytical X-Pert Pro diffractometer working in
Bragg−Brentano geometry with Cu Kα radiation. Thermogravimetric
analysis (TGA) was carried out on a PerkinElmer TGA-7
thermogravimetric analyzer under an air atmosphere. Emission and
excitation spectra were carried out on an Edinburgh FLS920
spectrophotometer with an nF900 flash lamp. The luminescence
lifetime was measured on an Edinburgh FLS920 phosphorimeter with
a microsecond lamp (100 mW). The quantum efficiency was
measured using the integrating sphere on a FluoroMax-4 spectropho-
tometer. Single-component gas sorption was tested on an ASAP 2020
analyzer at 273 and 298 K. The catalytic yield was measured and
calculated on a Thermo Fisher Trace ISQ gas chromatography (GC)/
mass spectrometry (MS) instrument. 1H NMR spectra were recorded
on a JEOL-ECX 500 FT instrument in CDCl3 or dimethyl-d6
sulfoxide with n-dodecane as the internal standard. Inductively
coupled plasma (ICP) was analyzed on a IRIS Advantage
spectrometer.
Preparation of 1-Eu. A mixture of Eu2O3 (0.08 mmol, 32.0 mg),
1 mL of 10% HNO3, and H6PTTBA (0.10 mmol, 57.1 mg) was
dissolved in a 8 mL mixed solution of DMF and H2O (7:1, v/v) and
stirred for 30 min to generate a homogeneous solution, which was
further transferred into a 25 mL Teflon-lined autoclave at 110 °C for
2 days. Colorless block crystals were obtained upon slow cooling to
room temperature at a rate of 10 °C h−1, followed by washing with
DMF/acetone. Yield: 95% based on H6PTTBA. Anal. Calcd for 1-Eu
(C72H66N7O31Eu3): C, 43.80; H, 3.34; N, 4.96. Found: C, 43.56; H,
3.58; N, 4.47. IR (KBr pellet, cm−1): 3405 (vs), 1596 (vs), 1394 (vs),
1113 (w), 1017 (w), 783 (s), 705 (w), 516 (w).
Preparation of other 1-Ln Complexes. Other 1-Ln (Ln = Yb,
Ho, Er, Tb, Dy, Lu, and Gd) complexes were prepared under
conditions similar to those of 1-Eu except that Eu2O3 was replaced by
the corresponding lanthanide oxides.
Preparation of 1-EuxTb1−x. The doped 1-EuxTb1−x complexes
were prepared in a manner similar to that of 1-Eu except that Eu2O3
was replaced by equal mixed lanthanide oxides. The Eu3+/Tb3+ molar
ratio for as-synthesized samples of 1-EuxTb1−x was determined by
ICP analysis (Table S4), which confirmed that the ratio of Eu3+/Tb3+
was equal to the one added for the reaction.
X-ray Crystallography. The diffraction data of 1-Ln were
collected on a Bruker Smart-APEX II CCD area detector equipped
with graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.071073 nm)
at 296(2) K. The structures were solved by direct methods and
refined by full matrix least-squares using the SHELXL and SHELXT
packages. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropic displace-
ment parameters, and hydrogen atoms except those on water
molecules were generated geometrically with fixed isotropic thermal
parameters and refined in the structure factor calculations. The block
of SQUEEZE in PLATON was carried out to remove the disordered
solvent molecules. The solvent content of 1-Eu was concluded from
TGA (Figure S1) and elemental analysis. The crystallographic data
and refinement parameters are shown in Table S1. Selected bond
lengths and angles are listed in Table S2. Furthermore, the crystals
downloaded from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre.
B
Inorg. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX