4926 J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 103, No. 23, 1999
Cheng and Chung
unfold the evolution of LC structure in polycondensation reac-
tors. In this paper, we intend to extend our previous work to
investigate the whole process of LC texture generation, evolu-
tion, and annihilation of different kinds of defects during the
polymerization reaction, thereby providing important informa-
tion for LCP synthesis.
mixed crystals, and melts to homogeneous phase, and then
changes into a heterogeneous system with the following
sequence of morphological changes: generation of anisotropic
phase, coalescence of LC domains, formation of schlieren
texture, annihilation of disclinations, and formation of stripe
texture.
3.1.1. Generation of Anisotropic Phase: LC Domains. Figure
2 illustrates a set of micrographs showing the typical LC phase
separation from a homogeneous phase and time evolution of
LC texture in the early stage of thin film polymerization. During
the heating, the monomers melted and the whole view area
became isotropic melt phase as shown in Figure 2a. In the early
stage of polycondensation reaction, oligomers formed in the
molten monomer phase. Their molecular weight and chain length
increased with reaction time. When the chain length of the
oligomers reached a certain value, they formed anisotropic phase
(LC phase) and separated from the isotropic melt. Figure 2b
shows the reaction induced phase separation process during the
polymerization. The dark area in the micrograph is the isotropic
phase, while the bright area represents the anisotropic phase.
The first sign of forming anisotropic phase was that many bright
LC domains instantaneously appeared in the view range.
Because of the polydispersity of the chain length, oligomers
were partitioned within the isotropic and anisotropic phase
according to the chain length.19 A fraction of relatively longer
chain length formed anisotropic domains, while others remained
in the isotropic phase.
2. Experimental Section
2.1. Preparation of Monomers: p-Acetoxybenzoic Acid
(ABA) and 2,6-Acetoxynaphthoic Acid (ANA). The monomers
were made by the acetylation of p-hydroxybenzoic acid (HBA)
and 2,6-hydroxynaphthoic acid (HNA) separately, with acetic
anhydride in refluxing toluene in the presence of a catalytic
amount of pyridine. The prepared monomer ABA was then
purified by recrystallization in butyl acetate. Similarly ANA
was purified in methanol. The success of acetylation for both
1
monomers was confirmed by H NMR.
2.2. Thin Film Polymerization. Two monomers, ABA and
ANA, with certain mole ratios were codissolved in acetone to
form a miscible solution. After solvent evaporating, a 0.5 mg
monomer mixture was placed on a glass slide. A drop of acetone
was deposited on the glass slide to dissolve monomers again.
After evaporation of the solvent, a thin layer of reactant mixture
was formed and attached to the glass slide and then sandwiched
between two glass slides with a ring spacer. The monomers
were attached on the bottom slide. The ring spacer was made
of stainless steel with a thickness of 0.5 mm. The whole package
was placed on a heating stage (Linkam THMS-600) of a
microscope and heated to a proposed temperature with a heating
rate of 90 °C/min. The sample was held at that specific
temperature during the whole reaction process. When heating
stage reached the proposed temperature, the reaction time began
to be recorded. During the heating, monomers sublimated to
the top slide from the bottom one because of the temperature
difference between these two slides. After reaching proposed
reaction temperature, all monomers were attached on the top
slide except the loss, which was less than 5%. Nothing was
remained on the bottom slide. The temperature of the top slide
was calibrated by testing the melting points of the pure
monomers as well as by measuring with thermocouple. The
temperature difference between the heating stage set by the
programmer and the top slide was 20 ( 2 °C in our experimental
temperature range. The polymerization reaction was carried out
on the top slide and all the temperatures mentioned refer to the
temperatures of the top slide. The reaction process was observed
in situ by a polarizing light microscope (Olympus BX50) with
crossed polarizers between which a red plate having the
retardation of 530 nm was inserted or not inserted. The optical
images were recorded by a digital video cassette recorder (DHR-
1000NP). The data of the micrographs were analyzed by
imaging software (Image-Pro Plus 3.0). The sample for thin
film polymerization is shown in Figure 1.
3.1.2. Coalescence of LC Domains: Formation of Schlieren
Texture. After the appearance of anisotropic phase, the size of
LC domains quickly increased, and correspondingly the number
of domains decreased because of domain growth and coales-
cence of adjacent LC domains.
Figures 2d-i illustrate a detailed coalescence process. Ac-
cording to previous study,6 we know that black brushes
originating from the points are regions where the director is
either parallel or perpendicular to the plane of polarization of
incident light, therefore the incident light is extinguished by
the crossed polarizers. When rotating the crossed polarizers, the
position of the points remains unchanged but the brushes rotate
continuously showing that the orientation of the director changes
continuously about the disclinations. If the sense of rotation is
the same as that of polarizers, the disclination is a positive one.
On the contrary, if the sense of rotation is opposite to that of
polarizers, the disclination is a negative one. The strength S of
a disclination is determined by the number N of the dark brushes
around the single disclination: |S| ) N/4. We found in our
experiment all LC domains formed in the isotropic melt had
the disclination strength of +1. In Figure 2e, the two domains
with strength S ) +1 are indicated by red arrows. When
coalescence happened, a negative disclination of strength S )
-1 as indicated by green arrow formed at the contact point of
these two domains as soon as they contacted each other. The
process followed was the annihilation of the two defects with
opposite signs as shown in Figures 2e-i. After the formation
of the disclination of S ) -1 during coalescence, this discli-
nation (indicated by green arrow) and one of adjacent discli-
nations of S ) +1 (indicated by red arrow) immediately moved
toward each other and then disappeared together. Figure 3 shows
the dependence of distance D between the two disclinations on
reaction time t (for the case of Figure 2e-i). The distance
decreased with reaction time almost linearly and two disclina-
tions disappeared together after 0.8 s of the coalescence. Thus,
a large domain with only one declination of S ) +1 was
formed.14
2.3. Characterization. FTIR Characterization. The mono-
mers and polymers were characterized by FTIR (Perkin-Elmer
FTIR Spectrometer Spectrum 2000.). Polymer sample (in KBr
pellet) was prepared by scraping materials from the slide.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Phase Separation and Time Evolution of Liquid
Crystal Texture during Polymerization Reaction. Using the
reaction system with the monomer composition of 73/27 (mole
ratio) ABA/ANA at a reaction temperature of 250 °C as an
example, we investigated the polycondensation reaction system.
During whole polymerization reaction, the system starts from