966
A.Z. El-Sonbati et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 60 (2004) 965–972
2.2. Preparation of 5-(21-carboxyphenylazo)-8-
hydroxyquinolinato (LH2)
2.6. Measurements
Microanalysis of all the samples was carried out at Cairo
University Analytical Center, and the metal contents of the
polymeric complexes was calculated by standard technique
[2–7]. IR spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer 1340
spectrophotometer. UV-Vis spectra were measured (Nuzol
mull) on a Pye Unicam 8800 spectrophotometer. Magnetic
measurements were carried out at room temperature us-
ing Gouy’s method, employing Hg[Co(SCN)4] for calibra-
tion purposes, and were corrected for dimagnetism by using
Pascal’s constant. Magnetic moments were calculated using
In a typical preparation, 25 ml of distilled water con-
taining hydrochloric acid (12 M, 2.68 ml, 32.19 mmol) was
added to 2-carboxyaniline (1.370 ml, 10.73 mmol). The re-
sulting mixture was stirred and cooled to 0 ◦C to which a
solution of sodium nitrite (740 mg, 10.73 mmol, in 20 ml
of water) was added dropwise. The so-formed diazonium
chloride was consecutively coupled with an alkaline solu-
tion of 8-hydroxyquinoline (1.557 g, 10.73 mmol) in 20 ml
of ethanol containing 602 mg (10.73 mmol) of potassium hy-
droxide. The orange precipitate which formed immediately
was filtered and washed several times with water. The crude
product obtained was purified by recrystallization from hot
ethanol (yield 60.9%). Anal. Calc. for C16H11N3O3: C, 65.5;
H, 3.8; N, 14.3. Found: C, 65.4; H, 3.8; N, 14.6%.
the equation: µeff = 2.84[TχM
]
corr. 1/2. 1H NMR spectra were
obtained on a JEOL Fx 900 Q Fourier transform spectrome-
ter with d6-DMSO as solvent and TMS as internal reference.
EPR measurements of powder samples were recorded at
room temperature (Tanta University, Egypt) using X-band
microwave frequency, as the first derivative, on a JEOL JES
FE 2XG spectrometer utilizing 100 kHz magnetic field mod-
ulation, with diphenyl picrylhydrazy (DPPH) as the refer-
ence material.
2.3. Synthesis of the complex
The Co(II), Cu(II) and Ni(II) salts (Aldrich) were used as
supplied.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential ther-
mal analysis (DTA) were performed as a Mettler TA2 in-
strument using micro-Pt cups. DTA peak areas were used to
calculate enthalpies. The ꢀH value was estimated from the
relation ꢀH = Aka/m, where A is the area, ka the calibration
constant of the apparatus, and m is the sample weight. The
instrument, and the precision expected was calibrated with
standards in the conventional way, and the expected preci-
sion was around 5%. The area under the peak was traced on
high-quality tracing paper, cut out, and weighed. The exper-
imental conditions for the DTA runs were as follows: heat-
2.4. Preparation of the metal complexes
All the metal complexes were prepared using a 1:1
(metal:ligand) molar ratio following a general method.
Hot solutions of anhydrous metal salts (10 mmol) in
EtOH (30 ml) and solutions of the required amount
of 5-(21-carboxyphenylazo)-8-hydroxyquinoline (LH2)
(2.5 mmol) in EtOH (30 ml) were stirred at room tempera-
ture and then maintained at reflux temperature on a water
bath for 3 h. The products were filtered, washed with EtOH,
Et2O and dried in vacuo to give the polymeric complexes
as powders.
ing rate: 2 ◦C min−1, Purge gas dry nitrogen: 100 ml min−1
and sample weight: ca. 10 mg.
,
The halogen content was determined by combustion of
the solid complex (30 mg) in an oxygen flask in the pres-
ence of a KOH–H2O2 mixture. The halide content was then
determined by titration with a standard Hg(NO3)2 solution
using diphenyl carbazone indicator [9].
However, the yield purity of the desired product depends,
to a great extent, on the particular reaction employed. For
example, reaction of LH2 with metal chloride does not oc-
cur even on prolonged refluxing and on the other hand, the
reaction is quit generally, though the yield is usually low.
Reaction metal acetate is found to the most satisfactory.
The yields are 75–90%, depending on the ligand. The pres-
ence of an –OH group at the eight positions in the coupling
2.5. Calculations
In the nickel complex, the following methods (a–d) were
used for the determination of the parameters of the interele-
cronic repulsion and of the ligand field, B and 10Dq [8].
(a) 10Dq = ν1, B = (2ν12 + ν22 − 3ν1ν2)/(15ν2 − 27ν1)
(b) 10Dq = ν1, B = 2ν22 + ν32 − 3ν1ν3 − 27ν1
(c) 10Dq = ν1, B = (ν2 + ν3 − 3ν1)/15
(d) 10Dq = ν1, B = [3ν1 {25(ν3 − ν2)2 − 16ν12}1/2]/75
The methods listed below were followed to determine
10Dq and B in the cobalt complex [8]:
(a) 10Dq = ν2 − ν1, B = (2ν12 − ν1ν2)/(12ν2 − 27ν1)
(b) 10Dq = 2ν1 − ν3 + 15B, B = [−(2ν1 − ν3) {−ν12 +
ν32 + ν1ν3}1/2]/30
(c) 10Dq = (2ν2−ν3)/3+5B, B = [7(ν3−2ν2) 3{81ν32−
16ν2(ν2 − ν3)}1/2]/510
(d) 10Dq = ν2 − ν1, B = (ν2 + ν3 − 3ν1)/15
Fig. 1. Hydrazone form.