The Journal of Organic Chemistry
NOTE
1
13
(
H NMR, C NMR, HRMS, UV, CD) were in good agreement
(d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, Ala #2 NH), 7.90 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H, GABA NH), 7.58
(d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H, Val #2 NH), 7.55 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, Trp ArH4), 7.31
(d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, Trp ArH7), 7.26ꢀ7.15 (m, 5H, Phe ArH), 7.09 (d,
J = 2.0 Hz, ArH2), 7.04 (dd, J = 8.1, 7.3 Hz, 1H, Trp ArH6), 6.95 (dd,
J = 8.0, 7.3 Hz, 1H, Trp ArH5), 4.48ꢀ4.42 (m, 2H, Phe RH þ Trp RH),
with those reported for the natural sample of 1, confirming the
original structural assignment of this metabolite.
5
1
The H NMR spectrum of 1 was analyzed in detail to probe
the conformational characteristics of the GABA component.
This segment of the molecule constitutes a seven-spin system,
with each proton giving rise to a unique signal in the H NMR
spectrum (Table 1). The complex multiplets corresponding to
each proton in the spin system were deconvoluted using a
software-based simulation/iteration sequence. It emerges that
4.40 (dq, J = 7.3, 7.1 Hz, 1H, Ala #1 RH), 4.32 (dq, J = 7.5, 7.1 Hz, 1H,
1
Ala #2 RH), 4.17 (dd, J = 9.3, 5.9 Hz, 1H, Val #2 RH), 3.59 (m, 1H, Val
#
1 RH), 3.09 (dd, J = 13.6, 4.4 Hz, 1H, Phe βH), 3.08ꢀ2.91 (m, 4H, Trp
0
βH þ Trp βH þ 2 ꢁ GABA γH), 2.83 (dd, J = 13.6, 10.4 Hz, 1H, Phe
0
15
βH ), 2.06ꢀ1.97 (m, 3H, Val #1 βH þ 2 ꢁ GABA RH), 1.80 (m, 1H,
3
Val #2 βH), 1.53 (m, 2H, GABA 2 ꢁ βH), 1.22 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, Ala #1
the J spinꢀspin coupling constants of the GABA residue are
HH
16
βH), 1.15 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, Ala #2 βH), 0.89 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, Val #1
mostly intermediate in magnitude (Table 1), confirming that
this region of the natural product does indeed exhibit conforma-
tional flexibility.
0
γH), 0.88 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H, Val #1 γH ), 0.64 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H, Val #2
0
13
1
γH), 0.56 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H, Val #2 γH ); C { H} NMR (100 MHz,
DMSO-d , DEPT, HMBC) δ 172.9 (Phe CdO), 172.2 (Ala #2 CdO),
71.7 (GABA CdO), 171.4 (Ala #1 CdO), 170.9 (Trp CdO), 170.7
Val #2 CdO), 167.4 (Val #1 CdO), 137.6 (Phe ArC1), 136.1 (Trp
6
In summary, the first total synthesis of unguisin A (1) is
reported, confirming the structure of this natural product. A
noteworthy feature of this synthesis is the rapid and efficient
cyclization reaction of a GABA-containing linear precursor;
this result may have broader implications in terms of a strategy
for facilitating the synthesis of analogues of “difficult” cyclic
peptides. In the immediate context of unguisin A (1), this work
will enable more thorough biological profiling to be performed,
and it provides a platform for the production of non-natural
analogues for structureꢀactivity relationship studies, especially
analogues that are conformationally constrained in the GABA
1
(
ArC7a), 129.1 (Phe ArC2/C3), 128.1 (Phe ArC4/C5), 127.4 (Trp
ArC3a), 126.4 (Phe ArC6), 123.5 (Trp ArC2), 120.8 (Trp ArC6), 118.4
(Trp ArC4), 118.2 (Trp ArC5), 111.3 (Trp ArC7), 109.8 (Trp ArC3),
57.3 (Val #1 RC), 57.1 (Val #2 RC), 53.7 (Trp RC), 53.4 (Phe RC), 48.3
1
7
(
(
(
Ala #1 RC), 48.1 (Ala #2 RC), 38.2 (GABA RC), 36.8 (Phe βC), 32.5
GABA γC), 30.9 (Val #2 βC), 29.8 (Val #1 βC), 28.0 (Trp βC), 25.2
GABA βC), 19.1 (Val #2 γC), 18.3 (Val #1 γC), 18.2 (Ala #1 βC), 17.8
0
0
(Ala #2 βC), 17.6 (Val #1 γC ), 17.3 (Val #2 γC ); HRMS (ESI, þve)
þ
0 57 8 8
þ
C H N O [MH ] requires m/z 777.4294, found 777.4301.
4
1
8
region.
Unguisin A (1). To a solution of 4 TFA (14.7 mg, 16.5 μmol) in
3
DMF (2 mL) was added a solution of DMTMM BF (16.2 mg,
4
3
4
9.5 μmol) in DMF (0.94 mL) followed by DIPEA (10.3 μL, 59.4
’
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
μmol), and the resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature under
a nitrogen atmosphere. At time intervals, an aliquot (2 μL) was with-
drawn from the reaction mixture, diluted with 0.1% TFA/MeOH
1
13
General Experimental Methods. H and C NMR spectra
were recorded at 400 and 100 MHz, respectively, and detailed peak
assignments were made with the aid of COSY, ROESY, DEPT, and
HMBC experiments. All reagents and solvents were used as obtained
commercially.
(80 μL), and directly analyzed by LCMS. After 5 h the reaction mixture
was concentrated in vacuo, and the residue was subjected to preparative
reverse-phase HPLC employing 0.1% TFA/H O as eluent A and 0.1%
2
TFA/MeCN as eluent B (gradient: 100% A for 10 min, then ramped to
D-ValineꢀD-AlanineꢀD-TryptophanꢀGABAꢀD-
80% B over 40 min). The appropriate fraction (retention time = 32.6
AlanineꢀD-ValineꢀL-Phenylalanine (4). Solid-phase peptide
synthesis was conducted manually on 0.05 mmol scale in a sinter-fitted
polypropylene syringe according to the following general procedures.
Resin preparation: Wang resin (100ꢀ200 mesh) preloaded with Fmoc-L-
phenylalanine (0.65 mmol/g) was immersed in DCM and agitated for
min) was freeze-dried to give 1 as a fluffy white solid (10.1 mg, 81%); mp
ꢀ
1
>
3
250 °C; [R]
D
þ29.6 (289 nm, c 0.36, EtOH); IR (neat) vmax (cm
)
293, 1667, 1659, 1635, 1542, 1523, 1506, 1201, 1183, 1143; UV
(
(
EtOH) λmax (log ε) 290 (3.60), 282 (3.65), 274 (3.63), 217 (4.40); CD
1
EtOH) λ ext (Δε) 222 (4.72), 204 (ꢀ12.33); H NMR (400 MHz,
1
h, then drained and washed with DMF (5 ꢁ 1 min). Fmoc deprotection:
DMSO-d , COSY, ROESY) δ 10.82 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H, Trp ArNH), 8.55
The resin was agitated in 10% piperidine/DMF (3 ꢁ 3 min), then washed
with DMF (3 ꢁ 1 min), DCM (3 ꢁ 1 min), and DMF (5 ꢁ 1 min).
The collected deprotection solutions were diluted 100-fold with 10% piper-
idine/DMF, and the resin loading was estimated by measuring the absorbance
6
(
d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H, Phe NH), 8.40 (d, J = 4.6 Hz, 1H, Ala #1 NH), 8.11 (d,
J = 4.2 Hz, 1H, Val #2 NH), 8.02 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, Trp NH), 7.87 (d, J =
.7 Hz, 1H, Val #1 NH), 7.82 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H, Ala #2 NH), 7.69 (dd, J
6.2, 4.8 Hz, 1H, GABA NH), 7.53 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, Trp ArH4), 7.33
9
=
ꢀ1
ꢀ1
of the piperidineꢀfulvene adduct at 301 nm (ε = 7800 M cm ). Peptide
coupling: A solution was prepared of the appropriate Fmoc-protected
amino acid (3 equiv relative to resin loading) and HBTU (2.9 equiv) in
minimal DMF. DIPEA (6 equiv) was added, and the resulting solution
was immediately added to the resin and agitated for 1 h. The resin was
drained and washed with DMF (3 ꢁ 1 min), DCM (3 ꢁ 1 min), and
DMF (5 ꢁ 1 min). Cleavage: After the last Fmoc deprotection, the resin
was washed with DCM (3 ꢁ 1 min) and then dried in vacuo. A solution
(
(
d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, Trp ArH7), 7.24ꢀ7.17 (m, 4H, Phe ArH2,3,5,6), 7.13
m, 1H, Phe ArH4), 7.11 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H, Trp ArH2), 7.07 (dd, J = 8.1,
7.1 Hz, 1H, Trp ArH6), 6.98 (dd, J = 7.8, 7.1 Hz, 1H, Trp ArH5), 4.33
(ddd, J = 12.0, 8.3, 3.4 Hz, 1H, Phe RH), 4.22 (dq, J = 6.9, 6.0 Hz, 1H, Ala
#2 RH), 4.09 (dd, J = 9.7, 9.7 Hz, 1H, Val #1 RH), 4.05 (dt, J = 7.6, 7.0
Hz, Trp RH), 3.95 (dq, J = 7.0, 4.6 Hz, 1H, Ala #1 RH), 3.49 (dd, J = 8.5,
4.2 Hz, 1H, Val #2 RH), 3.27 (dd, J = 13.1, 3.4 Hz, 1H, Phe βH), 3.19 (d,
J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, 2 ꢁ Trp βH), 3.12 (dddd, J = 14.0, 7.0, 6.2, 6.0 Hz, 1H,
2
of TFA/H O/triisopropylsilane (95:2.5:2.5) was added to the resin and
0
agitated for 2 h. The resin was drained and washed with TFA (2 ꢁ 1
min). The combined cleavage solutions were concentrated in vacuo to
give a clear glassy solid. Diethyl ether was added, and the supernatant
decanted (4 ꢁ ). The residue was dried in vacuo to afford 4 (TFA salt) as
GABA γH), 2.95 (dddd, J = 14.0, 7.0, 6.0, 4.8 Hz, 1H, GABA γH ), 2.60
0
(dd, J = 13.1, 12.0 Hz, 1H, Phe βH ), 2.10 (ddd, J = 13.4, 8.0, 5.8 Hz, 1H,
GABA RH), 2.01 (ddd, J = 9.8, 6.8, 6.6 Hz, 1H, Val #1 βH), 1.96 (ddd,
0
J = 13.4, 7.7, 5.2 Hz, 1H, GABA RH ), 1.69 (ddddd, J = 14.0, 7.7, 7.0, 7.0,
0
a white solid (41 mg, 96% overall yield); mp 105ꢀ115 °C; [R] þ24
5.8 Hz, 1H, GABA βH), 1.61ꢀ1.51 (m, 2H, Val #2 βH þ GABA βH ),
D
ꢀ
1
1
(
(
c 0.40, MeOH); IR (neat) v (cm ) 3276, 1660, 1539; H NMR
1.16 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, Ala #1 βH), 1.14 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H, Ala #2 βH),
0.75 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H, Val #1 γH), 0.73 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H, Val #2 γH),
max
6
400 MHz, DMSO-d , COSY, ROESY) δ 10.77 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H, Trp
ArNH), 8.50 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, Ala #1 NH), 8.25 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H, Phe
NH), 8.07 (br s, 3H, Val #1 NH ), 8.04 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, Trp NH), 7.95
0
0
0.67 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H, Val #1 γH ), 0.28 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H, Val #2 γH );
C { H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d , DEPT, HMBC) δ 173.1 (Ala #2
1
3
1
3
6
5
504
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo200813a |J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 5502–5505